Liquidia Corp - Earnings Call - Q3 2020

Transcript

Speaker 0

Good morning, and gentlemen. My name is April, and I will be your conference operator today. I would like to welcome everyone to the Liquidia Technologies Third Quarter twenty twenty Financial Results and Corporate Update Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. Following the presentation, we will conduct a question and answer session.

Instructions will be provided at that time for you to queue up for questions. I would like to remind everyone that this conference is being recorded. I will now hand the conference over to Jason Adair, Vice President, Corporate Development and Strategy.

Speaker 1

Thank you, and good morning. Welcome to Liquidia's third quarter twenty twenty financial results and corporate update conference call. Today's call will include forward looking statements pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 based on current expectations. Such statements represent management's judgment as of today and may involve significant risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expected results. Please refer to Liquidia's filings with the SEC, which are available from the SEC at www.sec.gov or from Liquidia's website at liquidia.com for information concerning risk factors that could cause such differences and otherwise affect the company.

I would now like to turn the call over to Neal Fowler, CEO of Liquidia.

Speaker 2

Thank you, Jason, and thank you all for joining us this morning. On the call with me today is Steve Baritarius, Interim Chief Financial Officer as well as other senior members of our company who are available to answer questions if needed. We had a very active third quarter and that has not changed midway through the fourth quarter. We have a lot to be excited about as a company with what we believe to be two outstanding assets, LIQ861, our dry powder version of inhaled treprostinil and our proposed acquisition of Rheorgen. Regarding August, we're very proud of this program and there are many reasons why, including a strong set of clinical data that we have delivered over the last eighteen months, A clear patient preference for eight sixty one is demonstrated by feedback in the INSPIRE trial.

A strengthened product life cycle with an IP position into 2037 with our recent patent allowance, otherwise known as the 135 patent application, covering patient treatment with dry powder treprostinil, the potential for an expanded market opportunity into pulmonary hypertension, and most recently, clear external validation of the value of eight sixty one as demonstrated by the recent unsolicited license offer. And as for Rheorgen, later this week, we will hold our special meeting of stockholders, which was scheduled for November 13. With this acquisition, we're excited to participate in the PAH marketplace later this year and partnering with Sandoz will open opportunities to build key relationships within the PAH community prior to the potential approval of eight sixty one. Once closed, the merger will change the profile of Liquidia as we will become a fully integrated biopharm company that can further support the PAH community. The merger will add a profitable business unit in Riogen through the sales of generic Remodulin, adds two additional highly experienced board members in Paul Manning and Roger Jeffs, and provides Liquidia with a scalable PAH infrastructure that can be leveraged for the potential launch of August.

We look forward to realizing the full potential of this merger and we'll provide further updates once closed. Now clearly, we've had a lot of moving parts, and I would like to take the opportunity to walk through the details of these activities and reinforce the reasons why we believe we were on a path that represents value for our company and our stockholders. Let's first talk about LIQ861 and our regulatory path. We continue to be encouraged to see that more than seventy patients have been treated with eight sixty one for more than two years, and we remain committed to making this product available for all patients. As such, we are very focused on the FDA approval of eight sixty one, which has a PDUFA goal date of 11/24/2020.

We firmly believe that eight sixty one is a meaningful innovation that has the potential to maximize the therapeutic benefits of treprostinil for patients with PAH, and we continue to support the FDA in its review of the eight sixty one NDA. As of today, we remain on track with our PDUFA goal date. That said, as other companies have reported, the FDA may be unable to conduct pre approval inspections prior to PDUFA goal dates due to restrictions on travel due to COVID-nineteen. In August, the FDA did communicate that preapproval inspections of two U. S.

Sites involved in the manufacturing of eight sixty one would be required before the FDA can approve the NDA for eight sixty one. We will continue to work with FDA with the goal of completing the preapproval inspections. To date, these inspections have not occurred. Importantly, should there be a delay on the FDA's review of eight sixty one of any kind, we have no reason to believe that resolution of these issues could not occur prior to the end of the thirty month stay or sooner with resolution of the Hatch Waxman litigation where we believe we will prevail. We will continue to provide updates on the FDA review as needed.

Another area where there has been a lot of activity surrounds our legal and intellectual property efforts. First, we have established a strong patent position for August through the 01/1935 patent allowance. In August, we were pleased to receive a notice of allowance from the USPTO for our 135 patent application related to August covering methods of treating pulmonary hypertension, pH, not just pulmonary arterial hypertension, with doses between about one hundred micrograms to about three hundred micrograms of dry powder treprostinil. The dose range in this patient is important when you consider that greater than seventy percent of patients who have been enrolled in the INSPIRE and extension studies titrated to eight sixty one doses of one hundred micrograms or more. With no maximum tolerated dose yet established, we feel that eight sixty one has the potential to increase the clinical utility of treprostinil by allowing patients to dose to relief, not tolerability.

Once issued, the patent, which should expire no earlier than 02/1937, will substantially strengthen Liquidia's intellectual property position with respect to dry powder inhaled treprostinil in pulmonary hypertension and represents an important milestone for eight sixty one on its path to potential commercialization. Regarding the Hatch Waxman litigation, we also continued our efforts to defend against the complaint filed by United Therapeutics asserting patent infringement against Liquidia under the Hatch Waxman Act in the U. S. District Court of Delaware and are pleased with our progress to date. In July, we filed a response to this complaint that included counterclaims of invalidity, non infringement and Orange Book delisting of two UTC patents related to the manufacturing of treprostinil.

Liquidia also responded to the filing of an amended complaint by United Therapeutics asserting infringement of an additional recently issued patent seven ninety three. Importantly, regarding this patent, Judge Andrews, presiding over the Hatch Waxman litigation, recently denied United Therapeutics motion to dismiss Liquidia's invalidity defenses and counterclaims. And in July, Judge Andrews also set a claim construction hearing for May 2021 and set the trial to begin in March 2022. In addition to our strong arguments of non infringement and invalidity in District Court, we also pursued an offensive strategy of filing inter partes review for the sixty six and nine zero one Orange Book patents that are listed in an effort to shorten the Hatch Waxman timeline. In October, we reported the Patent Office instituted one IPR for the nine zero one patent.

And for reasons we don't entirely agree with, the patent office denied institution of IPR on the 66 patent. While disappointing that the patent office did not institute IPR on the 66 patent, we're confident that technical and legal patent developments involved with the nine zero one IPR will continue to benefit our efforts against the 66 patent, a sister patent to the nine zero one patent in the Hackney Waxman litigation. As a result of this split decision, it is less likely that we will resolve the litigation in 2021 and we are focusing our business planning on launching eight sixty one toward the 2022. Given this timing, we are acutely aware of the need to optimize our cash runway. In July, we augmented our company's balance sheet with the close of an underwritten public offering that generated net proceeds of $70,300,000 our biggest raise to date.

After the appointment of Steve Barry Terrace as Interim CFO in August, we also began implementing actions to slow our monthly burn by prioritizing our 2021 investments around strategic R and D programs, defending our right to bring August forward and managing readiness for commercial manufacturing, which should allow us to extend our cash runway later into 2022. And as always, we will continue to be thoughtful and opportunistic in evaluating potential options to strengthen our strategic position and balance sheet. With regard to financials, I would now like to turn the call over to Steve to provide additional color around this plan and to review our third quarter financial summary.

Speaker 3

Thank you, Neil, and good morning, everyone. I will briefly summarize our financial results for the quarter ended 09/30/2020, and then provide perspective on our operating plan going forward. Let me start with highlights of the third quarter consolidated statement of operations. Research and development expenses were $7,700,000 for the 2020 compared with $10,900,000 for the same period of 2019. The decrease of 3,300,000 was primarily due to lower clinical trial spend.

General and administrative expenses were $7,200,000 compared with 2,400,000.0 for the same period of 2019. The increase of $4,800,000 was from the following: $1,700,000 of legal spending associated with the planned RareGen acquisition 1,100,000.0 in legal expenses from our ongoing litigation with United Therapeutics, 1,100,000.0 in spending driven by commercial readiness and approximately $900,000 that is related to twenty nineteen fourth quarter accounting reclassifications from R and D to G and A. Interest income and interest expense was a net expense of $156,000 for the quarter. In summary, this results in a net loss of $15,000,000 for the 2020 compared with $13,400,000 for the 2019. The additional loss of $1,500,000 was primarily due to the higher G and A expenses that partially offset by R and D expenses.

Let me now shift and discuss our cash on hand and the steps we are taking to optimize our cash runway. As of September 30, we had $79,600,000 of cash on our balance sheet. We have begun to implement a more cost efficient operating plan. This operating plan focuses investments against our top priority and paces spending accordingly to optimize our runway. The plan includes the following highlights: continuing to resource eight sixty one ongoing clinical trials and secure eight sixty one NDA approval seeking a partner to advance LIQ865 through a strategic collaboration investing in early stage preclinical targets, which we negotiated back from GSK last year.

That will leverage our current capabilities, proof of concept and expertise. This is an important driver of long term value creation. Pacing our commercial readiness investments to correspond with eight sixty one launch timing of the 2022 and diligently managing our external spending. We project that the full implementation of this plan will deliver greater than 20% reduction on annual spending in 2021 versus 2020. With regard to timing of the savings, we anticipate ramping over the next six months as we fully implement this plan.

In addition, assuming a successful close of the Variogen acquisition, this will improve our cash runway even further. Variogen is a positive cash flow business and we are looking forward to having it become part of Liquidia. The full implementation of this plan coupled with the Variogen acquisition extends our cash runway into the 2022. I would now like to turn the call back over to Neil.

Speaker 2

Thanks very much, Steve. In closing, as I've said before, we have closed another important quarter for Liquidia and we're poised to seize on the opportunities that lie ahead. And if you haven't heard it in my voice, we are very excited about entering the PAH community with the acquisition of Reagent and adding to it with the potential approval of eight sixty one. We're encouraged about the benefit that eight sixty one brings patients as demonstrated in our clinical trials. We're confident in the strong patent position that we have built the innovation of dry powder treprostinil.

And we're confident in the strong case we're building to defend our right to bring eight sixty one forward upon approval and are ready to respond to the FDA as needed in support of the review of the eight sixty one NDA. We're fully aware of what is required for the path ahead and have prepared for success, including the optimization of our investments and cash runway into 2022. All this has been made possible by an incredibly talented and dedicated team that goes above and beyond every day to support the Liquidia mission. Operator, we're now prepared to take questions. Thank you.

Speaker 0

And your first question is from Kambi Jazdi with Jefferies.

Speaker 4

Neal. How are you doing? Two questions.

Speaker 2

Hey, Kambi, how are you?

Speaker 4

Doing excellent. Thanks for asking. What is the significance of the high dose patent if competitors are able to demonstrate DPI equivalent to Tyvaso at doses below one hundred micrograms? And then second question is, will we learn more about key RareGen metrics such as revenues and margin splits at the special shareholders meeting? Thank you.

Speaker 2

Sure. Maybe what I'll do is Jason Adair, who's with me here, he and I will split the answer on your question. Don't know if Jason, you want take the first part of that?

Speaker 1

Sure. I can meet it. We also have Sean Glidden, our internal counsel on the phone. So I think, Combi, to your point, while that is true to think that maybe other products could show a comparable dose of what their product might be to Tyvaso dose, I think what we have to consider is that in the field of using treprostinil, exposure drives efficacy. And you see that with clearly the very good efficacy with the peripheral form.

So the intent with the inhaled form would be to push the dose to the highest level that you could in a tolerable way. And until August, we hadn't seen that. And in fact, we hadn't hit a maximum tolerated dose in our Phase I study. We've moved that forward into our INSPIRE study and now our extension study. And as you heard Neil say earlier, we have more than 70 patients on drug for more than two years.

Most of those patients are at doses above one hundred micrograms. So while it might be true to think that someone could show a comparable dose, practically speaking, you want to push that dose to the level that you can to avoid transitioning that patient to parental therapy. So what does that mean from a patent position? We've clearly demonstrated with our innovation that we have done something very unique and we look forward to bringing that to market. And if we need to get to more details, think we can talk about how we'll look for continuations to the work that we've done there to consider maybe using eight sixty one at lower doses.

So from that perspective, I think we're well protected and looking forward to driving forward. Does that address your question, Kambees?

Speaker 4

Absolutely, Jason.

Speaker 2

Yes. And Kambi, had made a comment too about RareGen. With time, we will have more specifics on that right now. We're seeking deal closing and can get into more of the financials with time on that.

Speaker 4

Thanks, Neil. Appreciate it. That's it for me this morning.

Speaker 2

Sure. Thank you.

Speaker 0

Your next question is from Liana Mostatos with Wedbush Securities.

Speaker 2

Hey Liana.

Speaker 5

Hi, this is Shweta for Liana. Thank you for taking my question. Where are you in your search for a strategic partner for August?

Speaker 2

Yes. So we are at the infancy of that. I think as we have shared with everyone in the past, our plans were to finish up the requisite tox work here and be prepared to go into Phase two. But looking at the realities, as you can hear in our commentary this morning, the priority for the company right now is eight sixty one, and we want to see eight sixty one realize its full potential. So with that, there are realities around our spending.

We think eight sixty five has a very viable path forward, but we need to find a partner to do that, that can also bring the necessary dollars and expertise to the party to do that and carry eight sixty five forward. And we think that's the more prudent path. So given the events that I shared earlier from third quarter and even most recently, we feel it's best to pursue a strategic partnership for eight sixty five and ultimately see eight sixty one and eight sixty five benefit from both of those moves.

Speaker 5

And I just have one follow-up question on eight sixty one. When do you plan to conduct the pediatric patients clinical trial for eight sixty one?

Speaker 2

Yes. So we'll do that in a timely fashion. Obviously, some of that is moving in concert with the potential approval for eight sixty one. So we don't have a proposed official date to start the trial. As you would imagine, we've had a very productive ongoing dialogue with the agency on that.

And as the details of that continue to emerge, we'll keep you posted.

Speaker 5

Okay. Thank you.

Speaker 2

Thank you very much.

Speaker 0

Your next question is from Serge Belanger with Needham and Company.

Speaker 2

Hey, Serge.

Speaker 6

Hi, good morning. Just a couple of questions for me. First on the upcoming PDUFA target action dates, it's about two weeks away. What are your expectations there? Do you expect a decision from the FDA?

And what kind of decision would it be? Or do you expect them to push out to delay it due to the lack of a preapproval inspection? And then second question is just an update on the hemodynamic eight sixty one study. And I guess when you could be in a position to have data there?

Speaker 2

Yes, Serge, happy to do that. Thanks for your questions. I'll take the first one, maybe I'll let Jason hit the second one. With regard to PDUFA date, we're in unchartered territory here. I think as well documented, COVID has thrown a wrench into a lot of things that are going on certainly in our society, but FDA is not immune from that.

And we've been in active dialogue with them throughout regarding this. I think it is unknown to us at this point in time exactly what will happen, whether that will be some type of delay due to the inspection, CRL which could be in their purview to do that because of the inspection. We just don't know. Clearly, as we've gotten within kind of T minus two to three weeks here of the PDUFA date and still have not had the inspection, we are just as attuned to this question as anybody. I think one of the things I think is important for investors to understand is in a kind of a twisted way here with Hatch Waxman underway, kind of what's wagging the dog more, if you want to put it that way, is the Hatch Waxman timeline.

So regardless of what FDA does here in this interim period here as we work through that, Still, the launch date, as we've indicated here, is the 2022 from our planning purposes. But we will be poised and ready to answer FDA in any way we can, whether that's preparation for the inspection or anything else. But I just think, Serge, we're in unchartered territory here. We don't really know either. We continue to have active dialogue, but they have not tipped their hat to us yet about what exactly that will look like.

Speaker 1

And Jason? Sure. And I'll briefly address the hemodynamic question, Serge. We do mention that in the queue. So as you recall, this is a dose response study that we're doing in Europe, specifically in Germany and France.

And we're pleased to say that we have started back with enrollment in sites in Germany. We actually are looking forward to getting those started in France. We're working closely with our clinical sites, but also the local regulatory authorities to ensure that we can proceed safely. And like we said, we're doing that in Germany. We hope to start doing that in France soon.

Speaker 6

Thank you.

Speaker 0

And there are no further questions at this time.

Speaker 2

Well, great. Thank you very much for joining us on the call this morning. We really appreciate it. We thank you for your continued interest and investment in Liquidia and look forward to updating you on our progress as the year continues. To everyone, have a great morning and be safe.

Thank you very much.

Speaker 0

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.