Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Tim Scannell

Director at MASIMOMASIMO
Board

About Tim Scannell

Timothy “Tim” Scannell (age 60) is an independent director of Masimo, appointed in October 2024; he serves on the Compensation Committee and the Business Risk & Review Committee, and stands as a Class III director with a current term expiring at the 2025 Annual Meeting and is nominated to serve until the 2026 Annual Meeting if elected . He brings over 30 years of medical device leadership, including service as President and COO of Stryker (2018–2021), and holds a BBA in Business Administration and Marketing and an MBA from the University of Notre Dame .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Stryker CorporationPresident & Chief Operating Officer2018–2021Oversaw all commercial businesses and regions globally
Stryker CorporationGroup President, MedSurg & Neurotechnology2009–2018Led multi-segment operations across medtech portfolio
Stryker SpineGeneral Manager, President2003–2008Business leadership in spine division
Stryker BiotechVice President, General Manager2001–2003Division GM responsibilities

External Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Novocure LimitedDirector2021–presentPublic company board service
Insulet CorporationDirector2014–presentPublic company board service
Regenity Biosciences (private)DirectorN/APrivate company board service
Synaptive Medical (private)DirectorN/APrivate company board service
CereVasc, Inc. (private)DirectorN/APrivate company board service
EXACT Sciences Corp.Prior Director2023–2024Prior public board service
Molekule Group, Inc.Prior Director2022–2024Prior public board service
Renalytix PlcPrior Director2022–2023Prior public board service

Board Governance

  • Independence: The Board determined all current directors other than the CEO are independent under Nasdaq Rule 5605(a)(2); Scannell is independent .
  • Committee assignments (post-Annual Meeting): Compensation Committee (member); Business Risk & Review Committee (member) .
  • Attendance and engagement: In fiscal 2024 the Board met 11 times, and no director attended fewer than 75% of Board and committee meetings during service period . The Business Risk & Review Committee met 7 times with a 100% attendance rate; Scannell is a member .
  • Declassification and elections: Board is being declassified, with Scannell nominated as a Class III director for a one-year term ending at the 2026 Annual Meeting .
  • Majority voting standard: Directors in uncontested elections must receive >50% of votes cast; if an incumbent fails, resignation is required and Board will publicly disclose its decision within 90 days .

Fixed Compensation

ItemAmountNotes
Annual Board Cash Retainer$70,000Paid quarterly in arrears
Audit Committee member fee$12,500Paid quarterly in arrears
Compensation Committee member fee$10,000Paid quarterly in arrears
Nominating & Governance Committee member fee$5,000Paid quarterly in arrears
Special Committee member fee$15,000Established Feb 2024 for consumer separation work
Committee Chair fee – Audit$25,000Includes membership component
Committee Chair fee – Compensation$20,000Includes membership component
Committee Chair fee – Nominating & Governance$15,000Includes membership component
Business Risk & Review Committee$0Non-compensated committee role
FY2024 Non-Employee Director Compensation (Scannell)AmountDetail
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash$16,041FY2024 actual
Stock Awards (RSUs)$199,926Grant date fair value per ASC 718
Option Awards$0None held
All Other Compensation$0None
Total$215,967Sum of items

Performance Compensation

  • Non-employee director equity awards are time-based RSUs; no performance-based metrics are disclosed for director compensation .
Performance MetricTargetMeasurementApplicability to Director Awards
Company performance metrics (e.g., revenue growth, EBITDA, TSR)Not disclosed for directorsNot applicableDirector RSUs are time-based; no performance metrics disclosed
  • RSU grant mechanics: Each non-employee director receives annual RSUs with $200,000 grant date fair value, vesting on the earlier of the first anniversary or the next annual meeting; RSUs vest in full upon a change-in-control .

Other Directorships & Interlocks

CompanySectorPotential Interlock/Conflict Considerations
Insulet CorporationDiabetes devices (insulin delivery)Not a direct competitor to Masimo’s core patient monitoring; low competitive interlock risk based on disclosed information .
Novocure LimitedOncology device therapyDistinct therapeutic area; low competitive interlock risk based on disclosed information .
Private boards (Regenity, Synaptive, CereVasc)Various medtechPotential relationship monitoring appropriate; Nominating & Governance Committee reviews related party transactions .

Expertise & Qualifications

  • Core skills: Healthcare operations, governance, technology/innovation, financial expertise, M&A, public company executive leadership, and ESG, per Board skills matrix .
  • Medical device operator: Deep operational leadership at Stryker across multiple businesses .
  • Board experience: Current and prior public medtech board roles (Insulet, Novocure; prior Exact Sciences, Molekule, Renalytix) .

Equity Ownership

Ownership ItemAmountNotes
Beneficial Ownership (Shares)0Percent of class “*”; as of March 26, 2025
RSUs outstanding (as of Dec 28, 2024)1,383RSU awards with respect to shares; unvested RSUs are not counted toward ownership guideline calculations
Options0None outstanding
HedgingProhibitedInsider Trading Policy prohibits hedging by directors
PledgingRestricted (pre-clearance required)Allowed only if financially able to repay without resort to pledged securities
Stock Ownership Guideline5x Board cash retainer ($350,000)Effective Feb 2025; previously $250,000
Guideline ComplianceAll non-employee directors compliant as of Mar 1, 2025Company-wide statement; calculation excludes unvested RSUs and unearned PSUs

Governance Assessment

  • Board effectiveness: Scannell adds seasoned medtech operating expertise to Masimo’s refreshed, declassifying board; his membership on Compensation and Business Risk & Review aligns him with executive pay oversight and strategic risk reviews, both areas critical given Masimo’s recent governance changes and executive transitions .

  • Independence and attendance: Confirmed independent; committee attendance across 2024 reported at 100% for relevant committees, and Board reported no director under 75% attendance, supporting investor confidence in engagement .

  • Compensation and alignment: FY2024 director pay shows a balanced cash-plus-equity mix with standardized RSU grants ($200,000) and modest cash fees ($16,041 for Scannell), plus change-in-control vesting on RSUs; Business Risk & Review service is non-compensated, reinforcing oversight intent .

  • Ownership and policies: Beneficially owned shares show 0 for Scannell at the proxy’s record date, but the company states all non-employee directors meet the updated 5x retainer guideline by March 1, 2025; hedging is prohibited and pledging tightly controlled, reducing alignment risk concerns .

  • RED FLAGS and mitigants:

    • RED FLAG (potential): 0 beneficially owned shares at record date could raise alignment questions for a new director; mitigated by company’s assertion of guideline compliance by March 1, 2025 and standardized RSU grants .
    • Related-party/Interlocks: Multiple medtech boards warrant monitoring; Nominating & Governance Committee explicitly reviews related party transactions, and no related-party transactions for Scannell are disclosed in the proxy .
    • Say-on-pay context: Executive say-on-pay support improved from 56% (2023) to 64% (2024), indicating ongoing investor scrutiny of compensation governance; Scannell’s Compensation Committee participation positions him within a sensitive oversight area .
  • Overall implication: Scannell’s operational pedigree and committee roles bolster oversight of compensation and strategic risk. Alignment mechanisms (ownership guidelines, hedging/pledging restrictions) and strong attendance support governance quality, while concurrent external medtech directorships should be monitored for conflicts, with current disclosures indicating low direct competitive overlap and formal related-party review processes in place .