MJ
MAYS J W INC (MAYS)·Q4 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Modest top-line growth with FY revenue up 4.1% YoY to $22.47M and Q4 revenue up 3.0% YoY to $5.65M; however, Q4 posted a net loss of $(0.09)M and EPS of $(0.05) vs $(0.02) in the prior-year quarter .
- Sequentially, Q4 revenue was essentially flat (+0.4%) vs Q3, but profitability declined from Q3’s $0.09M net income (EPS $0.04) to a $(0.09)M net loss (EPS $(0.05)) in Q4, indicating a softer margin exit rate into FY-end .
- Full-year losses narrowed materially (FY25 net loss $(0.14)M, EPS $(0.07) vs FY24 net loss $(0.41)M, EPS $(0.20)), reflecting better overall operating control across the year despite the weak Q4 print .
- No guidance or earnings call transcript was available in our sources; estimate comparisons were not possible due to lack of S&P Global consensus coverage for EPS/revenue in Q4 (thin coverage) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Revenue growth: Q4 revenue rose 3.0% YoY to $5.65M (from $5.49M), and FY revenue increased 4.1% YoY to $22.47M .
- Profit improvement on a full-year basis: FY25 net loss narrowed to $(0.14)M (EPS $(0.07)) from $(0.41)M (EPS $(0.20)) in FY24, underscoring annual progress despite Q4 softness .
- Q3 profitability: The immediately prior quarter delivered positive net income from operations of $0.09M (EPS $0.04), demonstrating the business can be profitable on a quarterly basis .
-
What Went Wrong
- Q4 loss widened YoY: Net loss of $(0.09)M (EPS $(0.05)) vs $(0.03)M (EPS $(0.02)) in Q4’24; net margin deteriorated to -1.6% from -0.6% YoY .
- Sequential margin deterioration: Q4 net margin fell to -1.6% from +1.5% in Q3, despite essentially flat revenue QoQ (+0.4%), indicating higher costs or mix/one-time items pressuring profitability at FY-end .
- Limited disclosure: No guidance and no earnings call in our source set; press materials contained no qualitative drivers or commentary, limiting visibility on the “why” behind the Q4 step-down .
Financial Results
Quarterly performance (oldest → newest):
Full-year comparison:
Estimates vs Actuals (Q4 2025):
Segment breakdown and KPIs: Not disclosed in the press release; no segment/KPI details were provided .
Guidance Changes
No guidance was provided in the earnings press release or other Q4 materials in our source set .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
No earnings call transcript was identified in our document set for Q4; press materials included only the results release without qualitative commentary .
Management Commentary
- The Q4 press release provided financial figures but contained no narrative, management quotes, or discussion of drivers, outlook, or strategy .
- Prior-quarter press releases similarly listed results with no qualitative context or quotes .
Q&A Highlights
- No Q&A highlights are available as no earnings call transcript was identified in our source set for the quarter .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus: No S&P Global consensus estimates for revenue or EPS were available for Q4 2025; the company has thin/no analyst coverage in the period reviewed. Actual revenue was $5.65M and EPS was $(0.05), both from the company’s press release .
- Implications: With no published consensus, near-term estimate revisions are unlikely to be a catalyst; investors will rely on the company’s reported trajectory (FY loss narrowing, but soft Q4 margins) to frame expectations .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Top-line grew modestly: Q4 revenue +3.0% YoY and FY revenue +4.1% YoY show steady albeit low-single-digit growth .
- Profitability remains fragile: Q4 swung from Q3’s $0.09M profit to a $(0.09)M loss, pushing net margin to −1.6% despite flat revenue, suggesting cost/mix pressure at FY-end .
- Annual improvement, weak exit rate: FY25 losses narrowed sharply vs FY24, but Q4 deterioration tempers the momentum into FY26 absent clarity on drivers .
- Limited disclosure and no guidance: Lack of call and guidance reduces visibility; without external estimates, narrative catalysts depend on future disclosures and demonstrated operating leverage .
- Watch next quarter for margin recovery: Given Q3 profitability, a rebound in margins and clarity on cost structure/occupancy (if relevant) would be a positive signal; continued softness would challenge the path to sustained profitability .
- Position sizing should reflect thin coverage/liquidity: With minimal Street coverage and sparse disclosures, price moves may be headline-driven; emphasize risk management and confirm fundamentals with ensuing filings .
Citations:
- Q4 2025 8-K and press release:
- Q3 2025 8-K and press release:
- Q2 2025 8-K and press release: