MI
MEDIFAST INC (MED)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 revenue was $115.7M and diluted EPS was -$0.07, with gross margin steady at 72.8%; revenue declined 33.8% YoY due to a 32.8% drop in active earning OPTAVIA coaches, while revenue per coach decreased only 1.4% YoY, reflecting improving productivity in newer cohorts .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, MED delivered a small revenue miss ($115.7M vs $116.4M*) but a meaningful EPS beat (-$0.07 vs -$0.25*); consensus coverage was thin (one estimate each) [GetEstimates].
- Management introduced Q2 2025 guidance of $85–$105M revenue and LPS of $0.00–$0.55, citing the timing of promotions and a strategic pullback in company-led marketing; they do not expect tariffs to impact 2025 .
- Early signs of stabilization include double-digit YoY growth in new coaches and moderating declines in revenue per coach; ASCEND adoption reached the mid-teens percent of orders in Q1, supporting GLP-1 users and those focused on maintenance .
Values retrieved from S&P Global for consensus fields (*).
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- New coach cohorts showed double-digit YoY growth, exhibiting new-customer growth consistent with prior high-growth periods; management highlighted “first meaningful YoY increase in new coaches in the past 3 years” .
- Revenue per active earning coach decline moderated to -1.4% YoY (vs -22% in Q1 2024), supported by increased productivity of newer cohorts .
- ASCEND product line traction: mid-teens percent of orders by quarter end, tracking to expectations; designed to support GLP-1 users and maintenance, with high-protein mini meals and nutrient packs .
What Went Wrong
- Active earning coach count fell 32.8% YoY to 25,400, driving the 33.8% revenue decline; SG&A as % of revenue rose to 73.9% from 68.3% due to deleverage and company-led marketing .
- Net loss (-$0.8M, -$0.07 diluted EPS) reflects lower revenue and a sharply higher effective tax rate (246.8%) from adjustments in unrecognized tax benefits and a stock comp shortfall, magnified by near break-even pretax income .
- Company-led marketing CAC remains less efficient than coach-led acquisition; guidance embeds reduced promotional activity in Q2, implying a weaker top line vs the recent deceleration trend .
Financial Results
Values retrieved from S&P Global for consensus fields (*).
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Q1 marked the first meaningful year-over-year increase in new coaches in the past 3 years, with a double-digit increase... we believe it sets the stage for future improvement in overall coach productivity and new customer acquisition” — Dan Chard, CEO .
- “Average revenue per active earning OPTAVIA coach for the first quarter was $4,556, a year-over-year decrease of 1.4% compared to a year-over-year decrease of [22%] during Q1 of 2024” — Jim Maloney, CFO .
- “Currently, almost half of OPTAVIA coaches have supported GLP-1 medication patients... with 25% of coaches having had personal experience using GLP-1 medications” — Dan Chard, CEO .
- On Q2 outlook: “We did run a promotion in Q1... In this year, in our guidance, we’re not really planning on having a promotion [in Q2]” — Jim Maloney, CFO .
- “We presently do not expect tariffs to have any meaningful impact on our business this year” — Dan Chard, CEO .
Q&A Highlights
- Guidance cadence: Midpoint of Q2 revenue range implies a faster YoY decline than recent trend due to Q1 promotions and the decision not to repeat in Q2; management cautioned not to extrapolate acceleration beyond Q2 .
- ASCEND adoption: Mid-teens percent of orders by end of Q1; tracking to expectations; supports GLP-1 users and off-ramp/maintenance segments .
- Marketing mix: Pullback in company-led spend where CAC was less efficient; reactivation programs work well; coach compensation is a more efficient growth lever .
- LifeMD economics: Subscription cost “less than $20” per month; most GLP-1 users covered by their own physician/insurance; LifeMD used where appropriate .
- Coach initiatives: Training evolved to GLP-1 environment; incentives designed to drive client acquisition and coach sponsoring; new cohorts showing productivity at high-growth period levels .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025: Revenue $115.7M vs consensus $116.4M* (miss ~$0.7M); EPS -$0.07 vs consensus -$0.25* (beat $0.18). Coverage: 1 estimate for revenue and EPS [GetEstimates] .
- Implication: The EPS beat, despite lower revenue, reflects stable gross margin and SG&A reductions; estimate dispersion is not meaningful given single-analyst coverage, but directionally, EPS estimates may need upward adjustment given cost control and LifeMD mark-to-market exclusion in guidance .
Values retrieved from S&P Global for consensus fields (*).
Key Takeaways for Investors
- EPS outperformed thin consensus despite a sizable YoY revenue decline; improving coach productivity and ASCEND adoption underpin early stabilization signals — actionable for monitoring estimate revisions and sentiment shifts [GetEstimates].
- Q2 guidance embeds the impact of fewer promotions and a shift away from less efficient company-led marketing; near-term top line likely softer, but management emphasized that trend should not be extrapolated beyond Q2 .
- Strategic pivot toward coach-led acquisition seems to deliver better CAC and productivity; watch for sustained positive turn in revenue per coach as a leading indicator before coach count growth .
- GLP-1 integration is deepening across the network (≈50% coaches have coached GLP-1 users; ≈25% have personal experience), broadening target segments and supporting ASCEND ramp — a key narrative driver .
- Tax rate spike was idiosyncratic (state exam resolution + stock comp shortfall) and magnified by near breakeven; not reflective of ongoing operations — reduces read-through risk .
- Balance sheet strength (cash/investments $164.6M; no debt) provides flexibility for execution across marketing mix, product launches, and clinical studies (<$2M expected cost, mostly 2025+) .
- Trading setup: Expect volatility around near-term revenue trajectory and guidance cadence; medium-term thesis hinges on ASCEND traction, productivity turning positive, and coach count stabilization — monitor KPIs quarterly .