ME
Midwest Energy Emissions Corp. (MEEC)·Q4 2021 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2021 revenue was $2.7M (+17.4% YoY) with net loss of $1.3M (EPS: -$0.01) and adjusted EBITDA roughly breakeven (-$0.02M), capping full-year revenue of ~$13.0M (+59.5% YoY) .
- Management introduced FY2022 preliminary revenue guidance of +60% YoY ($20–$22M), with majority of ramp in H2 on new licensing and supply agreements .
- Q4 underperformed the company’s October guidance for core business revenue ($4.0M) versus actual $2.7M; management later clarified on the Q4 call that the >$4M figure had been cited by a third party while the company guided to ~$13M for FY2021 .
- Catalysts: refined coal tax credit program ended Dec-2021 driving potential conversion to ME2C supply, litigation progress/expected developments, commissioning of Texarkana batch plant capacity (up to ~$100M annual), and rare earth/wastewater technologies advancing toward field testing .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Strong Q4 and FY momentum: “We reported strong fourth quarter results measured by most key metrics” and FY2021 revenue rose ~60% YoY to $13M .
- IP enforcement and commercial traction: multiple licenses signed, positive discovery progress, expectation of additional supply contracts from prior refined coal users .
- Capacity expansion: commissioning of fully paid Texarkana batch plant alongside Corsicana operations positions ME2C to handle up to $100M of annual business .
What Went Wrong
- Q4 core revenue miss vs guidance: October press release guided Q4 core business revenue to $4.0M; actual came in at $2.7M; management later distanced from the $4M figure on the Q4 call, calling it third-party guidance, creating a narrative discrepancy .
- Continued net loss despite improvement: Q4 net loss was $1.3M vs $2.0M in Q4 2020; adjusted EBITDA was near breakeven (-$0.02M) .
- Elevated costs: 2021 costs/expenses rose to ~$16.6M from ~$14.0M, driven largely by higher cost of sales on increased volume .
Financial Results
Revenue and EPS vs prior periods (chronological order: oldest → newest)
Adjusted EBITDA and Net Loss
Liquidity KPIs
Q4 2021 Results vs Guidance and Consensus
Note: Wall Street consensus via S&P Global was unavailable for MEEC in Q4 2021.
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We reported strong fourth quarter results measured by most key metrics… 2021 produced significant improvements in our bottom line and was a pivotal year” – Richard MacPherson, CEO .
- “To meet this expected increase in supply customers, we're in the process of commissioning our fully paid for manufacturing batch plant in Texarkana… [to] handle up to $100 million worth of business annually” .
- “Preliminary numbers… mirrored the initial results of us being able to capture over 90% of the rare earth elements… very exciting and something that we will be moving quickly to take into the field” .
- “We currently expect revenue to increase 60% year-over-year for 2022… majority of revenue increase expected in the latter half of the year” .
- “The coal usage in the country is at an all-time high over the past 5 years… we expect production of coal to increase” .
Q&A Highlights
- Rare earth commercialization and revenue timing: Management expects field proof late summer; initial commercial results by year-end with revenue starting early 2023; monetization via royalty on extracted value .
- Q4 guidance clarification: Management stated the >$4M Q4 expectation was third-party guidance; company’s own guidance focused on ~$13M FY2021 (which was achieved) .
- Macro demand: Coal demand rising amid high natural gas prices; plants maximizing burn; suggests supportive backdrop for mercury control supply .
- Refined coal conversion potential: Prior refined coal customers could represent ~$65–$80M/year of supply-side revenue opportunity (Q3 Q&A) .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) for Q4 2021 EPS and revenue was unavailable for MEEC. We attempted retrieval but SPGI/CIQ mapping for MEEC was missing, so consensus could not be sourced. As a result, comparisons to consensus are not presented [GetEstimates error].
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Q4 showed solid YoY revenue growth and improved loss metrics, but missed the October core revenue guidance; watch for narrative consistency in future guidance communications .
- FY2022 topline guidance of +60% YoY ($20–$22M) is driven by new licensing/supply wins and H2 ramp; monitor execution cadence and contract disclosures through mid-2022 .
- Structural tailwinds: refined coal program end creates conversion opportunity; litigation progress may accelerate commercial outcomes; near-term catalysts expected later in the month per management .
- Capacity is ready for scale: Texarkana batch plant commissioning expands throughput and customization capability—critical for supply-side growth .
- Emerging tech optionality: Rare earth/wastewater technologies progressing with promising lab results; field validation could unlock a meaningful non-core royalty stream beginning 2023+ .
- Short-term trading: Be alert to litigation updates and incremental license/supply announcements; these have historically correlated with revenue acceleration narratives .
- Medium-term thesis: Core mercury capture business poised for growth on coal demand/regulatory compliance, with additive upside from IP enforcement and REE/wastewater commercialization milestones .
Sources
- Q4 2021 earnings call transcript: revenue, EPS, adjusted EBITDA, costs, FY2022 guidance, capacity, litigation/technology updates .
- Q3 2021 earnings call transcript: revenue, supply mix, litigation progress, refined coal opportunity sizing .
- Q2 2021 earnings call transcript: revenue, cash, litigation discovery, technology development plans .
- Oct 19, 2021 8-K press release: Q4 core business revenue guidance ($4.0M) and operational summary .
- Feb 16–17, 2022 8-K: FY2022 preliminary revenue guidance (+60% YoY;
$20–$22M) and full-year 2021 preliminary unaudited revenues ($13.0M) .
Note: Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) for MEEC in Q4 2021 was unavailable; consensus comparisons are therefore not provided.