RR
Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 revenue rose 14% sequentially to $153.0M, while Class A diluted EPS was $(0.29) and net loss was $(14.0)M; Adjusted EBITDA was $9.0M as pricing headwinds offset production records .
- Versus Wall Street, revenue materially beat consensus, EPS missed, and EBITDA came in below expectations; estimates likely need to reflect weaker export netbacks and higher SG&A tied to rare earth acceleration (see Estimates Context) *.
- Guidance was trimmed to the low end for FY production/sales (ranges unchanged) and SG&A was raised to $39–$43M; Q3 2025 tons sold guided to 900–950K as some July exports were pulled into June .
- Strategic catalysts: Brook Mine rare earths timeline pulled forward to 2027; DOE lab engagement intensified; five‑year permit renewal secured; liquidity improved to ~$105M post-quarter with new 2030 notes at 8.25% .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Second consecutive production record: 999K tons (+1% QoQ, +11% YoY); Elk Creek hit 688K (+35% YoY), underpinning first‑quartile cost position .
- Per‑ton economics resilient: realized non‑GAAP revenue/ton up 1% QoQ to $123; Elk Creek costs in low $90s/ton; broader cost discipline maintained despite market softness .
- Rare earths milestones: timeline accelerated to 2027 commercial oxide production, five‑year mining permit renewal, DOE multi‑lab support; CEO: “an inflection point in the transition of Ramaco becoming a dual platform company” .
What Went Wrong
- Pricing headwinds: U.S. met coal indices down ~20% YoY reduced revenue/ton to $123 (−14% YoY), compressing cash margin/ton to $20 (from $35 YoY) .
- Profitability: operating loss $(13.8)M and net loss $(14.0)M widened QoQ; Class A diluted EPS fell to $(0.29) (vs $(0.19) in Q1) as higher costs and SG&A weighed on results .
- Selective idling & guidance trim: Rockhouse Eagle mine idled; FY production/sales targeted to low end to avoid loss‑making spot exports, reflecting continued export price pressure .
Financial Results
Headline financials vs prior periods
Key KPIs (tons sold and per‑ton economics)
Segment production breakdown
Estimates vs actuals (Wall Street consensus, S&P Global)
Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Note: Company-reported EBITDA was $3.852M and Adjusted EBITDA was $9.005M; S&P may reflect standard EBITDA definitions rather than company’s non‑GAAP adjustments .
Guidance Changes
Rationale: shift to low‑end targets due to weak export spot pricing, selective production reductions (e.g., Eagle mine idled), and SG&A uplift to accelerate Brook Mine commercialization .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO on dual‑platform strategy: “This marked a historic milestone… an inflection point in the transition of Ramaco becoming a dual platform company… rare earth and critical minerals oxides, as well as being a leading metallurgical coal producer” .
- Market discipline: “We… refuse to sell tons at a loss into a saturated market” .
- Macro signs: “Chinese domestic coking coal prices have rebounded approximately 38% in July… taken together, these factors point to a gradually rebalancing market… cautiously optimistic” .
- Rare earths opportunity: PEA indicates NPV8 $1.197B, IRR 38%, initial capex $473M; timeline accelerated to 2027 .
- CFO on liquidity and leverage: “Liquidity… more than $87M on June 30… as of July 31st… $105M… net debt to adjusted EBITDA a little over one times” .
Q&A Highlights
- Sales mix: “We’re roughly 2/3 seaborne, 1/3 domestic… maybe closer to 35% [domestic]” .
- 45X tax credit benefit: “In that kind of $15 million a year range on EBITDA… best estimate” .
- Asia spot netbacks: “Pricing today… sub $100 back to the mines… we’re not really in the spot market right now” .
- Government support mechanism: “Template like MP Materials… need a level playing field… throughput agreements and price supports… potential national critical mineral strategic reserve” .
- Scandium demand: “Boeing and Airbus alone could use up to 100–150 tons/year… Western source would boost adoption” .
Estimates Context
- Q2 2025 comparison: Revenue beat ($153.0M actual vs ~$131.5M consensus); EPS missed (−$0.29 actual vs
−$0.20 consensus); EBITDA under consensus ($3.6M vs ~$11.9M) *. - Drivers vs consensus: stronger volumes and domestic mix lifted revenue/ton; EPS/EBITDA pressured by higher cash costs ($103/ton) and SG&A uplift for rare earth acceleration .
- Implications: Street models likely need lower 2H export netbacks, incorporate SG&A raise ($39–$43M), and reflect selective production cuts to protect margins .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Actionable setup: Revenue momentum with disciplined volume management; the company will forgo low‑margin spot exports and bias FY output to the low end to protect cash margins .
- Near‑term trading: Expect lighter Q3 volumes (900–950K tons) after shipments pulled into June; monitor Chinese met coal prices and domestic fixed‑price negotiations for pricing support .
- Margin trajectory: Idling the Eagle mine and cost control at Elk Creek (low $90s/ton) should aid 2H per‑ton margins if export indices stabilize .
- Balance sheet: Post‑quarter 2030 notes increase liquidity to ~$105M and retire higher‑cost 2026 notes, improving flexibility ahead of rare earth capex needs .
- Structural catalyst: Rare earths timeline acceleration (commercial oxides in 2027), DOE engagement, and five‑year permit underpin re‑rating potential as dual‑platform critical minerals franchise scales .
- Policy tailwinds: 45X tax credit (2.5%) starting 2026 provides EBITDA uplift; monitor further federal support (e.g., strategic reserve/offtake constructs) .
- Estimate risk: Street likely revises EBITDA and SG&A down/up respectively; revenue beats may persist if domestic mix remains favorable *.
* S&P Global consensus and actual data used where noted; company financials cited from press release/8‑K and earnings call.