Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Natasha Seemungal

Senior Vice President and Co-Controller at MFA FINANCIAL
Executive

About Natasha Seemungal

Senior Vice President and Co-Controller at MFA Financial. Appointed Co-Controller in December 2021; joined MFA in 2009 as an Accounting Analyst and progressed to Assistant Controller before her current role. Education: B.S. and M.S. in Accounting from St. John’s University College of Business Administration. Age 40 per 2025 proxy. Context on company performance during her tenure: MFA delivered 2023 total shareholder return of 30.7% and improved 2024 operating metrics with Adjusted GAAP ROAE of 13.73% and Adjusted Distributable Earnings ROAE of 12.53% (used in NEO incentive plans) .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
MFA Financial, Inc.Accounting Analyst → Assistant Controller2009–prior to Dec 2021Built core accounting and reporting processes supporting mortgage REIT operations .
MFA Financial, Inc.Senior Vice President and Co-ControllerDec 2021–presentCo-leads controllership; supports reporting, controls, and finance infrastructure as company expanded non-mark-to-market financing and securitizations .

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
The Estée Lauder CompaniesEarly-career accountingPrior to 2009Foundation in corporate accounting before entering mortgage finance .

Fixed Compensation

  • Individual base salary and cash compensation for Ms. Seemungal are not disclosed; MFA’s Summary Compensation Table covers Named Executive Officers only (CEO, President/CIO, CFO, General Counsel, SVP Loan Ops, former Co-CIO) .

Performance Compensation

  • MFA’s performance incentive framework (for NEOs) combines formulaic ROAE-based metrics and a discretionary “IRM Bonus” reflecting risk management and individual performance; non-NEO executives have discretionary bonuses guided by similar company performance constructs (CFO/GC examples), but Ms. Seemungal’s specific metrics and payouts are not disclosed .

Company framework (NEO 2024 illustration):

MetricWeightingTargetActualPayout vs Target
Adjusted GAAP ROAE30% of formulaic bonus9.25%13.73%166.4% .
Adjusted Distributable Earnings ROAE30% of formulaic bonus9.25%12.53%181.9% .
Relative DE ROAE percentile (REM peer set)40% of formulaic bonus50th percentile81.8th percentile200% .
Discretionary IRM Bonus25% of overall target bonusCommittee setCommittee assessed leadership and risk mgmtDetermined case-by-case for NEOs .

Vesting constructs for long-term equity (NEOs):

  • TRSUs: 3-year cliff vest; dividend equivalents paid during vesting (2024 grants) .
  • PRSUs: 60% of LTI value; 3-year cliff; two components—Absolute TSR vs 8% simple TSR and Relative TSR vs REM constituents; vest 0–200% of target; dividend equivalents accrue and settle in shares if vest .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

  • Individual beneficial ownership, vested/unvested equity, and any pledged shares for Ms. Seemungal are not disclosed in the Security Ownership table (directors and NEOs only are itemized) .
  • MFA prohibits pledging and hedging of company securities for all employees and executives; insider trading policy also bars margin accounts for MFA securities .
  • Stock retention/ownership guidelines (4× salary threshold) apply to certain NEOs; applicability to Ms. Seemungal is not specified .

Employment Terms

  • Employment agreements are currently disclosed for the CEO and President/CIO; severance agreements disclosed for CFO and General Counsel; Ms. Seemungal’s individual employment contract terms (e.g., non-compete, severance) are not disclosed in the proxy .
  • Company clawback policy (three-year lookback for material restatements) applies broadly to performance-based compensation; award agreements include forfeiture/recoupment for covenant breaches .

Investment Implications

  • Disclosure gap: As a non-NEO executive, detailed compensation, equity holdings, and severance/change-of-control terms for Ms. Seemungal are not provided publicly, limiting direct pay-for-performance and trading signal analysis tied to her personal incentives .
  • Alignment safeguards: Company-wide prohibitions on hedging/pledging and established clawback and equity plan governance mitigate misalignment risk and reduce forced selling pressure from collateralized positions .
  • Company performance context: Strong ROAE metrics used for NEO incentives (and discretionary frameworks guiding senior executives) suggest an organizational emphasis on risk-adjusted returns and TSR—positive for execution quality across finance functions she co-leads .
  • Monitoring: Track Item 5.02 8-Ks for role changes/compensatory arrangements and future proxies for any elevation to NEO status that would unlock full compensation and ownership disclosures .