MC
MGT CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC. (MGTI)·Q1 2018 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2018 was a transition quarter: revenue from bitcoin mining was $0.956M, up 206% year over year but down ~47% sequentially from $1.8M in Q4 2017, driven by relocation of operations to Sweden and a sharp decline in bitcoin prices .
- Net loss improved year over year to $(4.549)M from $(5.891)M, with operating expenses rising due to cost of revenues, stock-based compensation, and payroll as the company scaled mining and added leadership .
- Liquidity tightened: cash fell to $0.461M with no debt; management flagged substantial doubt about going concern mitigated by plans to fully deploy miners in Q2 and potential capital raises .
- Operational ramp is the near-term catalyst: management expects Sweden facilities to be “fully operational” in Q2; CEO guided timeline in “weeks not days and also not months,” emphasizing 90 PH/s at full deployment and 15 MW power secured .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Year-over-year growth: Revenue rose 206% to $0.956M on expanded mining capacity; net loss narrowed by $1.342M year over year .
- Balance sheet simplification: Debt reduced to zero; stockholders’ equity of $9.892M at March 31, 2018; Company invested ~$7M in miners and prepaid ~$1M for electricity/hosting to drive capacity .
- Strategic expansion: At full deployment expected in May, capacity targeted at ~90 PH/s with ~4,200 owned miners and ~2,100 managed in Sweden; power secured via 15 MW lease .
- CEO: “We are debt-free, asset-rich… operating at about one-third of our theoretical capacity in Sweden… we’re talking about weeks not days and also not months” .
What Went Wrong
- Sequential revenue compression: Revenue declined from $1.8M in Q4 2017 to $0.956M due to lower production amid relocation and bitcoin price decline; difficulty remained high .
- Margin pressure: Gross margin fell to ~7.8% (cost of revenue $0.881M vs revenue $0.956M), and operating loss was $(4.236)M; net income margin was approximately −476% given fixed costs and lower BTC pricing .
- Controls and liquidity: Material weaknesses in internal controls were identified; cash fell to $0.461M and management noted substantial doubt about going concern absent ramp and/or additional capital .
Financial Results
Notes:
- Sequential revenue down ~47% from Q4 2017 to Q1 2018 .
- EPS and detailed Q4 2017 margin data not disclosed in retrieved documents.
Segment breakdown: Company reports primarily cryptocurrency mining; no separate segments disclosed .
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO (Robert Ladd): “We have characterized the first quarter as a transition quarter… we are debt-free, asset-rich… operating at about one-third of our theoretical capacity in Sweden… we’re talking about weeks not days and also not months” .
- CFO (Rob Lowrey): Revenue $1.0M Q1 2018 vs $312K Q1 2017 and $1.8M Q4 2017; decline driven by relocation to Sweden and sharp BTC price drop with difficulty remaining high; operating expenses up primarily due to cost of revenues, $0.928M stock-based compensation, and ~$0.5M payroll/recruiting; non-operating expenses $0.313M; net loss $(4.5)M; ~$7M spent on miners and ~$1M prepaid electricity/hosting; cash ~$0.5M; debt-free .
- 10-Q: Mined 91.5 BTC for $0.956M revenue; expects full Sweden facility operations in Q2 2018; power secured (15 MW); highlights liquidity plans and going concern language .
Q&A Highlights
- The company emphasized deployment pace and logistical constraints (customs, infrastructure hardware), reiterating near-term timeline and intent to accelerate prudently .
- CFO clarified revenue drivers: relocation-led production shortfall and BTC price/difficulty headwinds; detailed OpEx composition and capital invested into miners and power/hosting .
- Note: Additional Q&A detail was not available in the retrieved transcript beyond prepared remarks due to a document retrieval inconsistency; management’s statements above reflect the available call content .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) for Q1 2018 revenue and EPS was unavailable due to missing company mapping in SPGI/Capital IQ; therefore, we cannot provide a beat/miss comparison versus consensus for this quarter [GetEstimates error: Missing CIQ mapping for MGTI].
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term stock narrative hinges on execution speed in Sweden: a “weeks” deployment timeline and Q2 full operation target are key catalysts; a slower ramp or continued BTC weakness would pressure revenue/margins .
- Sequential revenue decline (−47%) and gross margin compression to ~7.8% highlight sensitivity to BTC price/difficulty and fixed power/infrastructure; watch realized BTC prices, difficulty trends, and uptime metrics .
- Liquidity is tight (cash $0.461M); management may need additional capital if ramp is delayed—monitor financing activities and dilution risk alongside warrant/stock issuance mechanics .
- Legal overhang diminished (class action dismissed), but an unjust enrichment claim proceeds—limited incremental risk evident; continue to monitor outcomes .
- Internal controls: material weaknesses acknowledged; hiring of CFO and remediation underway—progress here supports future uplisting ambitions and investor confidence .
- Capacity story remains intact: ~90 PH/s at full deployment with 15 MW power secured and thousands of miners owned/managed; once stabilized, revenue trajectory should improve, subject to crypto market volatility .
- No formal financial guidance or Street estimates available; frame expectations around operational milestones (hash rate online, miners deployed) and BTC environment; traders should focus on ramp headlines and BTC price moves as primary drivers [GetEstimates error].