Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Megan C. Lyon

Chief Strategy and Technology Officer at MILLERKNOLLMILLERKNOLL
Executive

About Megan C. Lyon

Megan C. Lyon is Chief Strategy and Technology Officer at MillerKnoll (MLKN), elected as an executive officer in 2019; she was age 45 as of May 31, 2025 and previously served as Chief Strategy Officer after joining on February 4, 2019 . Prior to MLKN, Lyon was a Partner and Managing Director at Boston Consulting Group, leading the West Coast consumer and retail practice; she holds an MBA with distinction from Northwestern’s Kellogg School and a BS in Managerial Economics from UC Davis . Company performance context during her executive tenure shows revenue moderating post FY2023 with EBITDA (as adjusted) remaining resilient and TSR fluctuating, aligning the executive pay program with EBITDA and revenue goals plus an rTSR modifier .

Company performance context

MetricFY 2021FY 2022FY 2023FY 2024FY 2025
Revenues ($USD Millions)$2,465.1 $3,946.0 $4,087.1 $3,628.4 $3,669.9
EBITDA, As Adjusted ($USD Millions)$336.0 $347.5 $382.8 $388.8 $355.3
Company TSR – value of $100 investment ($)$210.48 $137.73 $66.45 $132.65 $83.91

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic impact
Boston Consulting Group (BCG)Partner & Managing Director; led West Coast consumer/retail practiceNot disclosedLed corporate development, marketing/sales/pricing; global client work across U.S., Japan, China, SE Asia, South America

Fixed Compensation

YearBase salary ($)Target bonus (% of salary)Actual bonus paid ($)Notes
2020481,315 65% 216,592 AIP metric: Adjusted Operating Income; company performance factor 0.6923
2021474,784 65% 308,610 AIP metric: Adjusted Operating Income; capped at 100% of target due to pandemic design

Performance Compensation

Long-term equity design applicable to executive officers during tenure

ElementMetric(s)WeightingVesting / payoutDesign notes
PSUs (FY2025 grants)50% EBITDA, As Adjusted; 50% Revenue; rTSR ±25% modifier60% of LTI for “Other NEOs”; same vehicles used broadlyThree annual performance periods; all eligible to vest July 22 following the 3-year periodrTSR modifier: 25th percentile=0.75x; 55th=1.0x; 75th=1.25x; overall cap 200%
RSUs (FY2025 grants)Time-based40% of LTI for “Other NEOs”Vests 33.3%/33.3%/33.4% on July 22 annually, post 1st anniversaryDividend equivalents accrue as additional RSUs
AIP (FY2024–FY2025)EBITDA, As Adjusted100%Payout 0–200% of targetCompany-wide design for NEOs and salaried executives
PSUs (FY2024 grants)EBITDA, As Adjusted + rTSR modifier25% PSUs for “Other NEOs” (CEO 50%)Three annual performance periods; eligible to vest Aug 1 post 3 yearsrTSR modifier ±25% with 200% cap
Premium-priced stock options (FY2024)Stock price appreciation50% options for “Other NEOs”3-year ratable vesting$20.00 strike (~16% premium to grant-date close)

Megan C. Lyon – awarded units during NEO tenure

Grant yearStock options (#)RSUs (#)PSUs (#)
202127,447 7,822 6,531

Annual incentive outcomes (context during NEO tenure)

YearMetricTargetActualPayoutVesting / settlement
2020Adjusted Operating IncomeCompany planCOVID-adjusted factor 0.692369.23% of target (e.g., $216,592 for Lyon) Cash (deferral available under Executive Equalization Retirement Plan)
2021Adjusted Operating IncomeCompany planExceeded target; payout capped100% of target (e.g., $308,610 for Lyon) Cash (deferral available)

Equity Ownership & Alignment

Date/recordTotal beneficial ownership (shares)% of shares outstandingBreakdownPledging/hedgingOwnership guideline
Aug 13, 202126,354 0.03% Includes 23,033 options exercisable within 60 days (vested) Hedging and pledging prohibited by policy Executives with LTI target ≥100% of salary must hold 4x base salary; 40% retention of vested shares until met

Employment Terms

ProvisionTerms
Employment statusExecutive officers are generally “at will”.
Severance programIf terminated without malfeasance or voluntary separation: 18 months of base salary; health insurance maintained; subject to non-compete and non-solicit during salary continuation; requires release of claims .
Change-in-control (CIC)CIC agreements provide double-trigger severance for NEOs to ensure continuity during transactions; potential payments described in proxy; not disclosed for non-NEO executives .
ClawbacksMandatory recovery of incentive comp if restated under SEC 10D; discretionary recovery for improper conduct irrespective of restatement .
Anti-hedging/anti-pledgingDirectors and executive officers are prohibited from hedging and pledging MLKN stock .
Deferred compensationExecutive Equalization Retirement Plan allows deferral up to 50% salary and 100% AIP; company “mirror” contributions above statutory ceiling; Lyon’s FY2021 deferrals: $25,889; company contributions: $28,473; year-end balance $64,207 .

Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Shift from options to PSUs/RSUs: FY2025 program removed options, increased emphasis on PSUs (60%) and RSUs (40%), tightening line-of-sight to EBITDA and revenue outcomes with an rTSR modifier; FY2024 used premium-priced options alongside RSUs/PSUs .
  • Governance practices: No excise tax gross-ups, no option repricing, no guaranteed incentive comp; strong clawbacks, ownership requirements, and anti-hedging/pledging policies .

Compensation Peer Group and Say-on-Pay

ItemFY2024FY2025
Compensation peer group (examples)American Woodmark, La‑Z‑Boy, Steelcase, Leggett & Platt, Tempur Sealy, JELD‑WEN, RH, Wayfair, Williams‑Sonoma, HNI, UFP Industries, Sleep Number (and Masonite at the time) American Woodmark, Leggett & Platt, Somnigroup, Floor & Decor, Masonite, UFP Industries, Fortune Brands Innovations/MasterBrands, Wayfair, HNI, RH, Williams‑Sonoma, JELD‑WEN, Sleep Number, La‑Z‑Boy, Steelcase
Market positioningBenchmarked to median market compensation via Pay Governance, WTW, Aon Radford Benchmarked to median market compensation via Pay Governance, WTW, Aon Radford
Say‑on‑pay voteNot shown hereFor: 56,495,979; Against: 2,623,598; Abstain: 130,507; Broker non‑votes: 4,664,217

Investment Implications

  • Alignment and retention: Lyon’s role oversees strategy/technology amid an incentive framework weighted to EBITDA/revenue plus rTSR, with strict anti‑hedging/pledging and ownership requirements—positive for pay‑for‑performance and shareholder alignment .
  • Selling pressure and vesting cadence: Executives’ RSUs vest annually (July 22 post‑FY2025 program) and PSUs cliff on completion of the 3‑year cycle, potentially creating periodic supply; however, retention requirements (40% of vested shares until guidelines met) mitigate near‑term selling .
  • Risk controls: Double‑trigger CIC for NEOs, robust clawbacks, and prohibition of pledging reduce governance risk; no tax gross‑ups or option repricing curbs shareholder‑unfriendly practices .
  • Performance backdrop: Revenues stabilized in FY2025 while EBITDA remained solid and TSR volatile; the increased PSU weighting and multi‑metric design suggest continued emphasis on durable financial improvement and rTSR relative positioning, aligning strategy execution with incentive outcomes .