Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Hessam Nadji

Hessam Nadji

President and Chief Executive Officer at Marcus & MillichapMarcus & Millichap
CEO
Executive
Board

About Hessam Nadji

Hessam Nadji is President and Chief Executive Officer of Marcus & Millichap, Inc. (MMI) and a non‑independent director (Class I; director since 2016). He is 59 and holds a B.S. in information management and computer science from City University in Seattle . In 2024, MMI delivered revenue of $696 million (+8% YoY) with a net loss of $12 million amid industry headwinds; management highlighted improved TSR in the back half of the year and strong balance sheet flexibility (no debt; $394 million cash and marketable securities) . Governance design includes a separate Chair (George M. Marcus) and CEO, with a Lead Independent Director, six of eight directors independent, and regular executive sessions, mitigating dual‑role risks .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Marcus & Millichap, Inc.President & CEO2016–presentLed platform through severe CRE downturn; advanced talent, tech, and financing initiatives; maintained debt‑free balance sheet
Marcus & Millichap, Inc.Senior EVP & Chief Strategy OfficerNot disclosedDrove enterprise strategy and execution prior to CEO appointment
Marcus & Millichap, Inc.Chief Marketing Officer; Head of Specialty Brokerage DivisionsNot disclosedBuilt brand and specialty verticals to expand deal flow and client coverage
Marcus & Millichap, Inc.VP of ResearchJoined 1996Established research as client acquisition/retention lever and market thought leadership

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsNotes
No current public-company directorships disclosed for Nadji in the proxy biographies (past five years) .

Board Governance and Service

  • Board status: Non‑independent director; Class I; director since 2016; Executive Committee member (not chair) .
  • Structure: Separate Chair (George M. Marcus), CEO (Nadji), and Lead Independent Director (Don C. Watters). Six of eight directors independent; all standing committees chaired by independents; regular independent‑only sessions .
  • Committees: Executive Committee (members: George M. Marcus (Chair), Lauralee E. Martin, Hessam Nadji) .
  • Attendance: Board held five meetings in 2024; no director attended <75%; average committee attendance 100% .
  • Dual-role implications: CEO also serves as a director but not as Chair; presence of Lead Independent Director and independent committee leadership mitigates concentration of power and independence concerns .

Fixed Compensation

Metric202220232024
Base Salary ($)675,000 700,000 700,000
Target Annual Incentive ($)2,295,000 (reduced from original $2,700,000)
Actual Bonus Paid ($)2,339,750 811,850 1,240,448
Other Compensation ($)22,000 8,500 35,500 (incl. $31,500 auto; $4,000 401(k) match)

Notes:

  • 2024 target bonus opportunities were reduced by 15% across NEOs due to challenging conditions .
  • CEO pay ratio: 51:1 for 2024 (CEO total $4,568,174 vs. median employee $90,000) .

Performance Compensation (Annual Incentive)

ComponentWeightingPerformance Metric(s)TargetActualPayout
Financial50% (CEO) Pre‑tax net income$30 million (50% above operating plan) ($13) million pre‑tax net loss 0% for financial component
Strategic/Individual50% (CEO) Strategic goals (retention, recruiting, market share, initiatives) QualitativeQualitative; Committee determined goals met/largely achieved Contributed to overall CEO payout of 54% of target
Total100%54% of target ($1,240,448)

Say-on-Pay and program response:

  • Say-on-pay support fell to ~71% in 2024 (from ~93% in 2023); investors wanted performance‑based equity and concern over 2023 off‑cycle grant. Company added PSUs (50% of LTI) for 2025 with 3‑year revenue and Adjusted EBITDA goals (0–200% payout) .

Long-Term Incentives (Equity) – Grants and Structure

GrantGrant DateSharesVestingGrant Date Fair Value ($)
Annual RSU5/2/202472,0005 equal annual tranches; first vest 3/10/2025, then annually 2,344,320
Retention RSU (one‑time)8/11/2023150,0005 equal annual tranches; first vest 9/10/2024, then annually Included in 2023 “Stock Awards” ($8,646,760 total)

2025 LTI design change: 50% PSUs and 50% time‑based RSUs. PSUs: one‑third revenue, two‑thirds Adjusted EBITDA over FY2025–FY2027; payout 0–200%; cliff‑vest at 3 years subject to certification. Time‑based RSUs vest in four equal annual installments .

Vesting Schedule and Unvested Holdings (as of 12/31/2024)

Original GrantRemaining Unvested SharesVest CadenceNext Vest DateFinal Vest DateUnvested Market Value ($)
2/11/2020 RSU18,400 5 annual3/10/20253/10/2025703,984
2/11/2021 RSU36,800 5 annual3/10/20253/10/20261,407,968
2/10/2022 RSU55,200 5 annual3/10/20253/10/20272,111,952
2/9/2023 RSU73,600 5 annual3/10/20253/10/20282,815,936
8/11/2023 RSU (Retention)120,000 5 annual9/10/20259/10/20284,591,200
2/8/2024 RSU (effective 5/2/2024)72,000 5 annual3/10/20253/10/20292,754,720
Total376,00014,385,760

Note: Market values above use $38.26/share at 12/31/2024 . No stock options outstanding for NEOs .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

ItemDetail
Beneficial Ownership263,828 shares; less than 1% of outstanding (39,198,040 shares outstanding 3/12/2025)
Ownership GuidelinesCEO: 6x base salary; all NEOs satisfied guidelines as of YE 2024
Hedging/PledgingHedging and pledging prohibited for officers/directors; trading blackouts and 10b5‑1 allowed under policy
Vested vs. UnvestedUnvested RSUs with YE 2024 market value of $14,385,760 (see table above)
OptionsNone outstanding
Deferred Comp (SARs)Cash‑settled SARs fully vested/frozen at IPO; accrues interest (2024 rate 5.95%); YE 2024 balance $4,654,780; payout generally over 10 years upon qualifying event; full payout upon change in control
Potential Selling Pressure5‑year RSU schedules create annual vest events (Mar 10 and Sep 10); offset by ownership guidelines retention requirements

Related note: 3.5 million shares beneficially owned by Phoenix (controlled by Chair George M. Marcus) are pledged as collateral for a credit facility (Chair, not CEO) .

Employment Terms

TermKey Provision
Employment AgreementEffective March 31, 2016; at‑will; base salary $700,000; eligible for annual non‑equity incentive; no severance in employment agreement
Restrictive CovenantsNon‑competition, non‑solicitation, confidentiality, arbitration provisions included
Change‑in‑Control (CIC) PolicyDouble‑trigger: if terminated without cause or resigns for good reason within 12 months post‑CIC, receives 12 months’ base salary + target annual incentive (lesser of current/prior year), COBRA up to 12 months, outplacement up to $25k, and RSU acceleration; no excise tax gross‑ups
ClawbackDodd‑Frank‑compliant recovery policy for erroneously awarded incentive compensation following restatements; additional recovery for improper conduct
Insider TradingProhibits hedging/pledging; blackout windows; 10b5‑1 permitted

Estimated CIC Economics (as of 12/31/2024; double‑trigger)

ComponentAmount ($)
Cash Severance (12 months base + target bonus)2,995,000
COBRA Reimbursement29,948
Outplacement25,000
RSU Acceleration (unvested)14,385,760
SARs Payout3,491,085 (change in control termination scenario)

Multi‑Year Compensation (Summary)

YearSalary ($)Stock Awards ($)Non‑Equity Incentive ($)SARs Interest ($)Other ($)Total ($)
2024700,000 2,344,320 1,240,448 261,406 35,500 4,581,674
2023700,000 8,646,760 811,850 240,454 8,500 10,407,564
2022675,000 4,350,680 2,339,750 145,470 22,000 7,532,900

Performance & Track Record Highlights

  • 2024 execution: 7,836 closings; ~$49.6B transaction volume; financing platform expanded (1,240 transactions with 367 lenders); revenue +8% YoY to $696M amid industry volume declines; net loss of ~$12M; cash and securities $394M; no debt .
  • Strategic initiatives: Elevated investor outreach and research brand; targeted investments in talent, technology, auction and loan sale capabilities; investments in tech‑heavy crowdfunding and AI‑based financial modeling start‑ups .
  • Capital allocation: >$170M returned since 2022 via dividends and buybacks; 2024 dividends $20M and repurchases ~$0.6M .
  • Shareholder feedback: Say‑on‑pay at ~71% in 2024 prompted LTI redesign to add PSUs effective 2025 .

Compensation Committee & Benchmarking

  • Committee: Independent members; 5 meetings in 2024; 100% average attendance .
  • Advisor: FW Cook (independent; no conflicts) .
  • Peer group for pay benchmarking (13 business services firms; limited direct CRE services comps): B. Riley Financial, Brown & Brown, Crawford & Company, Douglas Elliman*, Houlihan Lokey, Moelis, Newmark Group*, Oppenheimer, Piper Sandler, PJT Partners, Ryan Specialty Group, SelectQuote, Walker & Dunlop .

Risk Indicators & Red Flags

  • One‑time off‑cycle CEO equity grant (150,000 RSUs, Aug 2023) raised investor concern; addressed via engagement and future LTI changes .
  • No tax gross‑ups; robust clawback; anti‑hedging/pledging policies for executives and directors .
  • Related‑party context: Ongoing immaterial services between MMI and Marcus & Millichap Company; Phoenix (Chair‑controlled) has 3.5M pledged shares; executive pledging is prohibited .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: High at‑risk pay (>2/3 of TDC at risk) and ownership guidelines (CEO 6x salary; met) support alignment; 2025 PSU introduction adds multi‑year operating rigor (Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA) vs. prior RSU‑heavy mix, reducing windfall risk and improving pay‑for‑performance optics after a 71% say‑on‑pay outcome in 2024 .
  • Retention and selling pressure: Substantial unvested RSU overhang ($14.39M YE24) with annual vesting (Mar/Sep) could create periodic liquidity events, but retention/ownership rules temper net selling; CEO realized $4.28M upon 2024 vesting, typical tax‑withholding observed .
  • Downside/CIC protection: Double‑trigger CIC with 1x salary + target bonus plus full RSU acceleration and SAR mechanics meaningfully increases change‑of‑control economics (headline cash ~$3.05M; total equity acceleration material), potentially incentivizing strategic optionality in prolonged downturns .
  • Execution risk: 2024 financial metric zeroed (pre‑tax NI miss), highlighting cyclical exposure; strategic investments in financing, tech, and specialty sales and debt‑free balance sheet provide operating leverage into recovery, but TSR/pay sensitivity and off‑cycle grant scrutiny warrant continued monitoring of PSU goal rigor and future say‑on‑pay outcomes .