Sign in

Robert Pons

Director at Marpai
Board

About Robert Pons

Independent director with 40+ years of operating experience across telecom and technology, including roles as CEO and senior executive in high‑growth and turnaround situations. Age 68; joined MRAI’s board in December 2023 and is classified as independent under Nasdaq rules .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Spartan Advisors, Inc.President & CEOJan 2017–presentManagement consulting for telecom/technology; turnaround focus

External Roles

CompanyRoleTenureNotes
Various (aggregate)Director (15 public company boards)VariousProxy cites service on 15 public company boards; specific issuers not enumerated

Board Governance

  • Independence: Determined independent by the board (Nasdaq Rule 5605) .
  • Committees: Compensation Committee member; Compensation Committee chair is Colleen DiClaudio .
  • Audit Committee: Not a member (Audit Committee members are Shiv, DiClaudio, Calabrese; Shiv chairs and is audit committee financial expert) .
  • Tenure on MRAI board: Since December 2023 .
  • Committee activity: Compensation Committee met 4 times in FY 2024; the year prior it met 6 times in FY 2023 .
  • Legal/Integrity: No adverse “Certain Legal Proceedings” disclosures for directors over the past 10 years .

Fixed Compensation

ComponentDec 7, 2023Jan 2024May 24, 2024
Cash annual retainer (independent directors)Terminated; shifted to equity grants
Standard RSU grant (independent director)Program approved: 50,000 RSUs (committee chairs 60,000); 30% vest on grant, 35% at year 1, 35% at year 2 50,000 RSUs issued to Pons under 2021 Plan; vest 30/35/35 as above Board approved additional 7,500 RSUs per year of service for each independent director
  • Director cash/meeting fees: The company eliminated cash director fees in favor of RSUs; no meeting fees disclosed .

Performance Compensation

MetricStructureDisclosure
Director equity performance metricsRSUs time‑based vesting (30/35/35); no performance metrics for director grantsNo director‑level performance metrics disclosed for equity awards

Other Directorships & Interlocks

  • Service on 15 publicly traded company boards (aggregate); specific current interlocks not enumerated in the proxy .

Expertise & Qualifications

  • Turnaround and operating experience: 40+ years; CEO and senior executive roles in high‑growth and turnaround contexts .
  • Sector exposure: Telecom and technology companies .

Equity Ownership

MetricMar 7, 2024Jul 1, 2025
Beneficial ownership (shares)40,867 (24,200 shares plus 50,000 RSUs of which 16,667 vested) 116,700 shares
Beneficial ownership (%)<1% <1%
  • Director RSUs: 50,000 issued Jan 2024 to Pons under the 2021 Plan, with 16,667 vested by Mar 7, 2024 (30% tranche) .
  • Options/warrants/pledges: No options or warrants disclosed for Pons; no pledging disclosed in the proxy .

Related‑Party Exposure and Conflicts

DateTransactionTermsPons Involvement
Jan 16, 2024Insider private placementAggregate 1,322,100 shares at $0.9201 per share (Nasdaq closing bid)Listed among participating insiders; individual allocation not specified
2025 proxy summaryInsider private placement recapReiterates Jan 16, 2024 insider private placementConfirms insider participation group includes a director (Pons)
  • Approval controls: Related‑party transactions are subject to Audit Committee review per charter; interested members abstain .

Governance Assessment

  • Alignment positives: Independent status; member of Compensation Committee that can retain independent advisors and evaluates adviser independence; director pay is equity‑heavy (no cash retainer), increasing skin‑in‑the‑game via RSUs .
  • Ownership alignment: Pons increased beneficial holdings from 40,867 to 116,700 shares between Mar 2024 and Jul 2025, supported by RSU vesting and service, which improves alignment but remains <1% of outstanding shares .
  • Potential conflicts/RED FLAGS: Participation in an insider private placement can raise optics around preferential access, though pricing matched market closing bid; Audit Committee oversight of related‑party transactions provides a mitigating control .
  • Board effectiveness signals: Compensation Committee activity (four meetings FY 2024) indicates engagement; lack of disclosed board meeting attendance metrics for individual directors limits assessment of attendance rigor .
  • Broader governance environment: Very high CEO‑aligned ownership (Lamendola beneficially 36.1%) may concentrate influence; authorization of blank‑check preferred stock introduces potential anti‑takeover entrenchment risk, though board states it is not intended for anti‑takeover purposes .