Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Neeraj Singh

Chief Risk Officer at M&T BANKM&T BANK
Executive

About Neeraj Singh

Neeraj Singh, age 54, is Senior Executive Vice President (since 2024) and Chief Risk Officer (effective January 31, 2025) at M&T Bank Corporation, joining from USAA where he served as CRO; prior roles include CRO and Head of Global Consumer Modeling at Citigroup’s U.S. Consumer Bank, with earlier risk leadership posts at TD Bank and Barclays; he holds an undergraduate degree from Birla Institute of Technology and an MBA from the University of Maryland . He steps into the CRO role following a strong 2024 at M&T: GAAP net income $2.59B, diluted EPS $14.64, ROA 1.23%, net operating ROTCE 14.5%, CET1 11.68%, NIM 3.58%, criticized C&I/CRE loans down from $12.6B to $9.9B, and resumed buybacks (2.1M shares, $400M) alongside a 3% dividend increase, providing a constructive backdrop for risk execution .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
M&T Bank CorporationChief Risk Officer2025–presentLeads enterprise risk strategy and governance; joins Executive Leadership Team reporting to CEO and Board Risk Chair .
M&T Bank CorporationSenior Executive Vice President2024–2025Executive officer designation ahead of CRO transition .
USAAChief Risk Officer2021–2024Oversaw financial and non‑financial risks and compliance across complex environments .
Citigroup U.S. Consumer BankChief Risk Officer & Head of Global Consumer Modeling2017–2021Led consumer risk modeling and CRO responsibilities for U.S. Consumer Bank .

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsNotes
None disclosedNo public company directorships or external board roles disclosed in filings .

Fixed Compensation

  • No Singh‑specific base salary, target bonus, or 2025 pay mix disclosed as of the latest proxy and 10‑K; M&T emphasizes pay‑for‑performance, with heavy use of long‑term equity and discretionary STI guided by scorecards .
  • M&T does not enter into individual employment contracts with executives (reduces guaranteed pay, increases at‑risk alignment) .

Performance Compensation

ComponentMetricWeightingTarget/ThresholdsActual/Payout (most recent disclosed)Vesting
PHSUsAbsolute ROTCE (safety & soundness)100%≥ 5% annual hurdle2024 ROTCE 14.5% → tranches for 2022–2024 grants vested at target Ratably over 3 years; tranche forfeited if hurdle not met .
PVSUs (2024 grant design)Absolute & Relative ROTCE100%Absolute ≥17% → 150% payout; 5%–<17% scaled by peer percentiles; <5% → 0% 2022–2024 3‑yr avg ROTCE 16.3% → 77% earn‑out; DEUs paid proportionally 3‑year cliff; 0%–150% payout .
PVSUs (2025 grant design)ROTCE and ROTA50% ROTCE; 50% ROTAROTCE: same as 2024 design; ROTA: ≥1.25% → 150%; 0.35%–<1.25% scaled by peer percentiles; <0.35% → 0% Not yet applicable to Singh disclosed; program parameters set for 2025 3‑year cliff; 0%–150% payout; DEUs accrue .
Stock Options (NQSOs)Share price appreciationExercise price = grant‑date closeValue only if stock price rises; used as smaller fraction of LTI in 2025 mix Vest ratably over 3 years; 10‑year term .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

PolicyRequirementNotes
Executive Stock Ownership GuidelinesCEO: 6x base salary; Other NEOs: 3x; Other exec officers: 2xCompliance expected within 5 years; must hold 50% of net shares from equity settlements until threshold met; all executive officers were in compliance as of Feb 14, 2025 .
Anti‑HedgingProhibits hedging or short‑term trading in M&T securitiesApplies to all employees and directors .
Anti‑PledgingProhibits pledging for directors and restricts executive pledging to limited circumstancesNone of the NEOs pledged securities in 2024; prior policy mechanics detailed (excess over ownership guidelines; ability to repay without pledged shares; approvals) .
  • Individual share ownership for Singh was not disclosed in the 2025 proxy stock ownership table; executives as a group held 871,554 shares (with options details for named officers) .

Employment Terms

TopicTermsImplications
Severance Pay PlanBroad‑based plan; continuation of cash base salary up to 104 weeks; benefits continuation up to 18 months at active employee rate for eligible terminations (Qualifying Event) .Provides baseline protection; not a bespoke contract; amount based on position/years of service .
Change‑of‑Control (Equity)All vesting restrictions lapse at CIC; PVSUs pay the greater of target or actual performance as of the quarter‑end before CIC announcement; cash severance payable only upon termination .Equity is effectively single‑trigger; cash severance remains double‑trigger .
Retirement/Death/Disability (Equity)Death/disability → immediate vest at target; retirement eligibility (generally ≥55 and ≥10 years service): PHSUs vest immediately; PVSUs/NQSOs continue vest on original schedules; NQSOs exercisable up to earlier of 4 years post‑retirement or original term .Encourages longer tenure; preserves performance linkage for PVSUs post‑retirement .
Employment ContractsCompany does not enter into employment contracts with executives .Lower guaranteed protections; greater pay‑for‑performance discretion .
Clawback/ForfeitureForfeiture policy enables downward adjustments and cancellation of unvested equity for significant loss events, restatements, or risk policy violations; SOX clawback for CEO/CFO .Strong malus/clawback framework supports risk alignment .

Investment Implications

  • Incoming CRO has deep multi‑institution risk credentials (USAA CRO; Citi U.S. Consumer Bank CRO/modeling lead) with formal elevation to executive officer and CRO, positioning him to sustain 2024 momentum in criticized loan reduction, capital strength, and risk governance subcommittee oversight; this lowers execution risk in risk management transition .
  • Compensation alignment is robust: ownership guidelines (2x–6x salary) with anti‑hedging/pledging constraints, forfeiture/clawback, and LTI metrics tied to absolute/relative ROTCE and ROTA with multi‑year vesting; these features mitigate short‑termism and align incentives with durable returns and safety and soundness .
  • Equity vesting accelerates at CIC (single‑trigger for equity), but cash severance requires termination; watch for any future Form 8‑K/Item 5.02 offer letter or Form 4 activity to assess potential insider selling pressure or retention sweeteners; none disclosed to date .
  • Shareholder support for pay was high (94% say‑on‑pay), and the C&HC Committee increased PVSU weighting and reduced options in 2025 LTI mix, signaling a tilt toward performance‑conditioned equity over pure optionality—supportive of long‑term TSR correlation and reduced repricing risk .