Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Steven Litchfield

Chief Financial Officer and Chief Corporate Strategy Officer at MAXLINEARMAXLINEAR
Executive

About Steven Litchfield

Steven Litchfield, age 55, has served as MaxLinear’s Chief Financial Officer and Chief Corporate Strategy Officer since July 2018; previously he was EVP & Chief Strategy Officer at Microsemi, an equity research analyst at Banc of America Securities, and a production engineer at Toyota Motor Corporation. He holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Purdue University and an MBA from USC Marshall School of Business . MaxLinear’s 2024 results provide performance context for his role: revenue was $360.5 million (net loss $245.2 million), and year-end market capitalization was ~$1.7 billion; the company’s “value of $100 investment” TSR metric stood at 52 in 2024 versus a peer index of 150 in 2020, reflecting recent industry and company headwinds . Non-GAAP bonus metrics used in executive programs emphasize revenue and non-GAAP operating income, with adjustments for items such as stock-based compensation and costs related to the terminated Silicon Motion transaction .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Microsemi CorporationEVP & Chief Strategy Officer2009–2018Led corporate strategy during growth culminating in sale to Microchip; oversaw portfolio and M&A strategy
Microsemi CorporationVP, Analog & Mixed-Signal Group2006–2009Business unit leadership in analog/mixed-signal semis
Microsemi CorporationVP, Corporate Marketing & Business Development2003–2006Corporate marketing and BD leadership
Microsemi CorporationDirector, Business Development2001–2003Corporate development and growth initiatives
Banc of America SecuritiesEquity Research AnalystPre-2001Sell-side research coverage (semis)
Toyota Motor CorporationProduction EngineerPre-2001Manufacturing and operations experience

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Several early-stage technology companies (private)Board MemberCurrentNetwork access and industry insights from private tech boards

Fixed Compensation

Metric202220232024
Base Salary (paid) ($)425,690 425,690 445,040
Effective Annual Base Salary ($)425,000 443,750
Target Bonus (%)80%
Target Bonus ($)355,000
Actual Bonus (settled in shares) ($)412,781 91,633 54,493
Total Compensation ($)3,385,480 2,917,810 9,656,785

Performance Compensation

ComponentMetricWeightingTargetActual (FY2024)PayoutVesting
Annual RSUs (granted 2/2/2024; 30,697 shares)Service-based75% of 2024 annual equityN/AN/ATime-based only25% each Feb 20, 2025–2028
Annual PSUs (granted 2/2/2024; 92,090 target shares)Relative net sales and non-GAAP diluted EPS vs peer group25% of 2024 annual equity100% target, with 30%/100% caps in years 1/2Sales: 3rd percentile; EPS: 13th percentile0% for 2024 trancheThree-year period with annual testing; service through full period
Retention RSUs (granted 2/22/2024; 195,822 shares)Service-basedRetention-focusedN/AN/ATime-based only1/3 each Feb 20, 2025–2027
Retention Options (granted 2/22/2024; 293,733 options)Stock price (exercise $18.76; expire 2/22/2034)Retention-focusedN/AMarket price $12.74 on 3/26/2025 (OTM)No intrinsic value at $12.7410%/20%/30%/40% vesting on Feb 20, 2025–2028
2024 Bonus settled in shares (granted 2/20/2025; 3,170 shares)Corporate & individual goalsPer plan$355,000 targetCorporate $15,443; Individual $39,050; Total $54,493Shares issued; withholding in cashSettled on 2/20/2025 per board approval

Notes:

  • PSU performance peer set is defined and excludes certain names; targets are percentile ranks relative to peers; 2024 underperformed threshold (no vesting) .
  • Annual cash bonus program metrics are revenue and non-GAAP operating income, with defined adjustments and committee discretion .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

ItemDetail
Total Beneficial Ownership936,827 shares (1.1% of 86,373,820 outstanding as of 3/26/2025)
Ownership GuidelinesCFO must hold ≥3× base salary; Litchfield in compliance as of record date
Pledging/HedgingProhibited under Insider Trading Policy; 10b5‑1 plans require pre-clearance; quarterly blackouts apply
Deferred RSUs (12/31/2024)Balance $7,404,801; 2024 deferral additions $91,633; withdrawals $780,396; earnings (loss) $(341,910)
Options – Exercisable306,000 at $18.40, expiring 8/10/2025
Options – Unexercisable293,733 at $18.76, expiring 2/22/2034
Option MoneynessAt $12.74 close on 3/26/2025, both strikes are above market (OTM)
Unvested RSUs (12/31/2024)30,697; 195,822; 13,778; 2,356; 3,247 (market value cells in proxy)
Unvested PSUs (12/31/2024)92,092; 48,500; 7,888; 11,691 (market value cells in proxy)
2024 Vested Stock Awards36,302 shares; $825,933 realized (excluding deferred amounts)

Employment Terms

TermProvision
Employment AgreementJuly 2018 offer letter; at-will; base salary raised to $450,000 effective 4/1/2024 (from $425,000); 2024 target bonus 80% of effective base salary
Severance (no change-of-control)If terminated without cause or for good reason: 12 months base salary; pro‑rated target bonus; up to 12 months health premiums; vesting acceleration of awards that would vest within 12 months; 12‑month option exercise window (not exceeding original term)
Change-of-Control (double trigger)If terminated within 3 months before to 24 months after a change-of-control: 24 months base salary; 200% of target bonus; up to 24 months health premiums; full vesting of all unvested equity; 24‑month option exercise window (not exceeding original term); 280G best‑net cutback
Estimated Economics (as of 12/31/2024)CoC termination: Salary $900,000; Bonus $720,000; Equity acceleration $8,331,672; Health benefits $51,131
Estimated Economics (non‑CoC)Salary $450,000; Bonus $360,000; Equity acceleration $3,920,233; Health benefits $25,565
ClawbackExecutive compensation recovery policy applies to incentive-based compensation upon accounting restatements; three-year lookback; adopted Aug 9, 2023 (replacing 2018 policy)

Compensation Structure Observations

  • Equity-heavy and retention-focused 2024 awards: RSUs ($3.67M) and options ($3.30M) supplemented standard annual grants, reflecting elevated retention priorities and broader burn-rate increase tied to out-of-cycle grants in 2024 .
  • Annual equity mix shifted: For 2024 annual awards, Litchfield’s mix was 75% time-based RSUs and 25% PSUs; PSUs paid 0% for 2024 due to sub-threshold peer-relative performance, emphasizing pay-for-performance structure .
  • Peer frameworks: Compensation decisions benchmarked against a semiconductor peer group; PSU performance measured against a defined peer set for net sales and non-GAAP EPS percentile ranks .

Governance, Say-on-Pay, and Peer Practices

  • Say-on-Pay support: Advisory vote has historically received ≥87% support since 2012, indicating broad shareholder acceptance of the pay program design .
  • Committee oversight: Compensation Committee (independent directors) oversees goals, plan administration, human capital, and equity grants; meets regularly and uses Compensia for benchmarking .
  • Equity plan amendments: 2025 proposal reallocates inducement plan shares into the main plan without incremental dilution; context includes retention needs and prior burn rate increase .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment and retention: Litchfield exceeds stock ownership guideline (≥3× salary), is subject to clawback, blackout, and strict anti-pledging/hedging rules—positive for alignment and risk discipline .
  • Near-term selling pressure: Time-based RSU vestings cluster around Feb 20 annually; however, options are out-of-the-money at $12.74 (as of 3/26/2025), limiting option-driven sell pressure; deferred RSU balances indicate smoothing of share settlements over time .
  • Pay-for-performance rigor: PSU hurdles (peer-relative net sales and non-GAAP EPS) resulted in zero vesting for 2024, reinforcing performance gating amid revenue declines and losses; retention awards were used to mitigate talent risk in a challenging cycle .
  • Change-of-control economics: Double-trigger protection (24 months salary; 200% bonus; full equity acceleration) is standard for CFO roles in semis; investors should factor potential dilution optics at a transaction close, which is partially mitigated by anti-repricing governance commitments in future plans .