Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Robert Oseland

Chief Operating Officer at PLAYSTUDIOSPLAYSTUDIOS
Executive

About Robert Oseland

Robert L. Oseland, age 58, is Chief Operating Officer of PLAYSTUDIOS (appointed January 23, 2025). He joined the company in 2019 as General Manager of playAWARDS and spent the past two years as Portfolio President of the Americas overseeing casual games, playAWARDS, and studio operations; he holds a B.S. in Hospitality Management from UNLV and brings 30+ years of gaming/hospitality experience, including COO of Paragon Gaming and leadership roles at Wynn Resorts (opening Wynn Las Vegas and Encore) . Company-level TSR, revenue, and EBITDA growth metrics tied to his tenure are not disclosed; notably, FY2024 PSUs for NEOs did not vest due to performance targets not achieved, signaling stricter goalposts or underperformance versus targets .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
PLAYSTUDIOS (playAWARDS)General ManagerSince 2019Led global loyalty/marketing platform; foundational role before elevation
PLAYSTUDIOSPortfolio President, AmericasPast two years (as of Jan 2025)Oversaw casual portfolio, playAWARDS, and studios in Las Vegas, San Francisco, Portland
Paragon GamingChief Operating OfficerNot disclosedManaged portfolio of North American hospitality and gaming properties
Wynn Resorts, Ltd.Various leadership positionsNot disclosedInstrumental in opening/operations of Wynn Las Vegas and Encore

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Paragon GamingChief Operating OfficerNot disclosedOperated multi-asset gaming/hospitality portfolio
Wynn Resorts, Ltd.Leadership rolesNot disclosedKey operations leadership in major resort openings (Wynn Las Vegas, Encore)

Fixed Compensation

ComponentAmountEffective DateNotes
Base Salary$400,000Jan 23, 2025Increased upon appointment as COO
Annual BonusDiscretionaryOngoingAmount determined by Compensation Committee; no fixed target % disclosed
Equity Program UseRSUs (time-based), PSUs (performance-based)OngoingCompany emphasizes multi-year RSUs; PSUs tied to annual financial targets; does not currently grant options to executives (historically had options company-wide)

Performance Compensation

Award TypeGrant DateMetricWeightingTargetActual/PayoutVesting
RSUsJan 23, 2025Service (time-based)Not disclosedN/AN/A250,000 RSUs vest Jan 15, 2028, continuous employment required
PSUsJan 23, 2025Company financial performance (FY2025–FY2027 targets)Not disclosedTargets set by Compensation CommitteePayout range 0–100% based on performance716,666 PSUs scheduled: 233,333 vest Feb 28, 2026; 233,333 vest Feb 28, 2027; 250,000 vest Feb 28, 2028, subject to employment and performance
RSUsMar 7, 2025Service (time-based)Not disclosedN/AN/AAdditional grant: 250,000 RSUs vest Jan 15, 2028 (same date)
PSUsMar 7, 2025FY2025 financial performanceNot disclosedFY2025 targetsActual number issued ranges 0–100% of 233,333 PSUs233,333 PSUs vest Feb 28, 2026, performance- and service-based
PSUs (Company-wide FY2024)Mar 11, 2024FY2024 financial targetsNot disclosedFY2024 targetsNot achieved; PSUs did not vestNEO awards forfeited; indicative of stringent targets or underperformance

Notes:

  • PSUs metrics (e.g., revenue/EBITDA/TSR) and weightings are not specified in filings; Compensation Committee sets annual targets .
  • Company’s broader executive equity approach emphasizes RSUs for retention; PSUs for pay-for-performance; no current options program to executives .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

HolderBeneficial Ownership (Shares)% of OutstandingVested vs UnvestedPledging/Hedging
Robert L. Oseland582,543Not disclosed in table (“*”)Not disclosed (not a 2024 NEO; outstanding award detail not presented)Company policy prohibits hedging and pledging; shorting also prohibited

Additional note: The Jan 23, 2025 appointment 8-K references “restricted stock units and stock options previously granted” in prior roles; specific option strike/expiry/quantity not detailed in available filings .

Employment Terms

ProvisionNon-CIC Qualifying TerminationCIC Qualifying TerminationEligibility / TierOther Conditions
Cash Severance0.5x Base Salary1.0x (Base Salary + Target Bonus)Tier 2 Executive (Oseland) Release required; restrictive covenants compliance
Health BenefitsCOBRA premiums up to 6 monthsCOBRA premiums up to 12 monthsTier-based durationsEnds upon COBRA ineligibility or new employer coverage
Time-based EquityTier 2: Lapse unless Committee decides otherwiseFull vesting up to 2x Time-Based Annual Equity Target; if short, Company issues additional fully-vested equity to reach 2x targetTier-based accelerationCommittee may settle vested equity in cash
Performance-based EquityTier 2: Lapse unless Committee decides otherwiseVesting at 100% of target up to 2x Performance-Based Annual Equity Target; if short, Company issues additional fully-vested equity to reach 2x targetTier-based accelerationCommittee may settle vested equity in cash
Nature of EmploymentAt-will; no employment agreementsAt-willCompany-wide NEO disclosureOffer letters may set at-will terms

Compensation Committee Analysis

  • Committee: Judy K. Mencher (Chair), Joe Horowitz; both independent under Nasdaq/SEC rules .
  • Consultant: Compensia, Inc. engaged as independent advisor for executive/director comp in 2024; no other material services provided, reducing consultant conflict risk .
  • Meeting cadence: 5 meetings in 2024; oversight across plans, policies, and grants .

Compensation Structure Observations

  • Shift toward RSUs and PSUs: Company currently does not grant options to executives; equity is primarily RSUs (retention) and PSUs (performance), lowering risk of underwater options repricing and increasing retention linkage .
  • Discretionary bonus component persists: Annual cash bonus amounts are discretionary, permitting qualitative assessment but potentially diluting strict formulaic pay-for-performance .
  • Performance stringency: FY2024 PSUs did not vest, indicating either elevated hurdles or insufficient performance versus targets; FY2025 PSU award outcomes will be informative for alignment .

Risk Indicators & Red Flags

  • Hedging/pledging prohibited: Policy prohibits derivatives, shorting, and pledging of company stock, mitigating misalignment and forced-selling risk .
  • Controlled company: Founder/CEO Andrew Pascal controls >50% of combined voting power; while the company states it does not utilize exemptions currently, governance dynamics should be monitored .
  • Severance/CIC economics: Tier 2 protection with equity acceleration that can include issuance of additional fully-vested equity to meet 2x annual targets under CIC—could be shareholder-unfriendly if triggered without commensurate performance, though requires Qualifying Termination and release .

Investment Implications

  • Retention and execution: Oseland’s large, long-dated RSU and multi-tranche PSU grants create material retention hooks through 2028; failure of FY2024 PSUs to vest increases the incentive to deliver FY2025+ performance to unlock PSU value .
  • Event-risk asymmetry: CIC provisions for Tier 2 include 1.0x cash (base + target bonus), health benefits, and aggressive equity acceleration up to 2x annual equity targets with “top-up” issuance; any strategic transaction could translate to meaningful equity settlement and potential supply overhang depending on settlement method (stock vs cash) .
  • Alignment: Beneficial ownership of 582,543 shares plus unvested awards indicates real equity exposure; pledging/hedging prohibitions strengthen alignment; however, discretionary bonus design and controlled-company status warrant continued oversight on pay-for-performance discipline .
  • Near-term signal: FY2025 PSU tranche for Oseland (233,333 units, 0–100% payout) vests Feb 28, 2026—watch disclosure of performance metrics and interim progress; outcomes will provide a clear read-through on operational execution under his COO tenure .