Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

NI

Neonode Inc. (NEON)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 2025 headline profit was driven by a one-time $15.5M gain from a patent assignment (cash received in October), eclipsing weak underlying operations; revenue fell 48.7% year over year to $0.43M and operating expenses rose 4.0% .
  • Income from continuing operations was $13.9M ($0.83 per share) versus a $1.0M loss (-$0.07 per share) a year ago; net income per share was $0.85, distorted by the patent gain and related $3.88M accrued broker fee .
  • Management put the legacy zForce platform into maintenance mode and is reallocating focus to the MultiSensing AI computer vision platform, particularly automotive, acknowledging legacy revenues are declining faster than anticipated .
  • Liquidity strengthened structurally post-quarter: working capital stood at $26.2M at 9/30 (includes receivable from the patent assignment), with October cash proceeds expected to support runway while the company seeks new automotive partnerships; litigation activity also resumed in the Apple case as the stay was lifted on Sep 15, 2025 .
  • Street consensus (S&P Global) was unavailable for NEON this quarter; model comparisons to “consensus” are not applicable. Values retrieved from S&P Global.

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Monetized IP: Recorded a $15.5M gain from a patent assignment (cash paid in October), transforming quarterly profitability and bolstering near-term liquidity .
  • Liquidity/working capital: Working capital for continuing operations was $26.2M at 9/30/25 (vs. $16.1M at 12/31/24), aided by the patent receivable and despite weak core revenue trends .
  • Strategic refocus: Management decisively shifted resources to MultiSensing, emphasizing fully synthetic, data‑driven HMI and automotive, with CEO noting execution speed and new vertical exploration: “we’re reinforcing our leadership in fully synthetic, data-driven HMI solutions…expanding strategic partnerships in the automotive market” .

What Went Wrong

  • Core erosion: Revenues declined 48.7% YoY as license fees and NRE both fell; management cited continued weakness in printer and passenger car touch applications .
  • Expense pressure: Operating expenses rose 4.0% YoY to $2.1M, despite shrinking revenue base, underscoring the need for scaling wins in the new focus areas .
  • Cash burn persists operationally: Cash used by operations was $1.5M in Q3 (vs. $1.3M a year ago), with management attributing the increase to higher net loss when excluding the patent gain .

Financial Results

MetricQ3 2024Q1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Revenue ($USD Millions)$0.838 $0.513 $0.599 $0.430
EPS (Basic & Diluted, $)$(0.07) $(0.10) $(0.11) $0.85
Gross Profit ($USD Millions)$0.815 $0.504 $0.593 $0.421
Operating Income ($USD Millions)$(1.225) $(1.965) $(2.110) $13.810
  • Notes: Q3 2025 operating income includes the $15.5M patent assignment gain and $(3.878)M accrued broker fee . YoY revenue decline reflects printer and automotive infotainment weakness .

Revenue breakdown (mix):

MetricQ3 2024Q1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
License Fees ($USD Millions)$0.731 $0.497 $0.404 $0.406
Non‑Recurring Engineering ($USD Millions)$0.107 $0.016 $0.195 $0.024

Liquidity and cash flow KPIs:

MetricQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Cash and Accounts Receivable ($USD Millions)$15.7 $13.6 $12.2 (excl. patent gain)
Working Capital – Continuing Ops ($USD Millions)$14.1 $12.1 $26.2
Cash Used by Operations ($USD Millions)$(1.4) $(1.7) $(1.5)
Patent Assignment Gain Recognized ($USD Millions)$15.5

Consensus vs. actuals (S&P Global):

MetricQ3 2025 ConsensusQ3 2025 Actual
Revenue ($USD Millions)n/a (coverage unavailable via S&P Global)$0.430
EPS ($)n/a (coverage unavailable via S&P Global)$0.85
Values retrieved from S&P Global.

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Company guidance (revenue, margins, opex, etc.)FY/Q4 2025None providedNone providedMaintained no formal guidance
  • Management offered directional commentary (legacy revenue pressure; focus on automotive/MultiSensing) but did not provide quantitative guidance ranges .

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

Note: No Q3 2025 earnings call transcript was available in our document set.

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1 2025)Previous Mentions (Q2 2025)Current Period (Q3 2025)Trend
Legacy business demand (printer/auto infotainment)Negative trend; offset efforts across MultiSensing and zForce Continued decline; legacy weakness persists “Decline… remained subdued… headwinds will persist” Worsening/unchanged weakness
Platform focus (MultiSensing)Emphasis on execution speed; delivering to a commercial vehicle OEM; exploring new verticals First‑mover in synthetic, data‑driven HMI; auto partnerships; new verticals Reinforcing leadership; expanding auto partnerships; exploring new verticals Consistent strategic push
zForce platformContinued to serve existing customers Focus on deliveries; serve installed base Transitioned to maintenance mode due to narrowed addressable market De‑emphasized
IP monetization/legal$15.5M patent gain; Apple case stay lifted on Sep 15, 2025 New catalyst
Operating expensesDown 8% YoY in Q1 Up 5.3% YoY in Q2 Up 4.0% YoY in Q3 Mild upward pressure
Cash burnCFO: Q1 cash used in ops $1.4M Q2 $1.7M Q3 $1.5M (excl. patent cash) Persistent burn ex‑one‑time

Management Commentary

  • Strategic pivot: “transition the zForce® platform into maintenance mode… Moving forward, we are aligning the company around future-proofing our MultiSensing AI computer vision platform for expanded deployment in the automotive sector and exploring additional application areas” .
  • MultiSensing focus and differentiation: “reinforcing our leadership in fully synthetic, data-driven HMI solutions, where our execution speed continues to differentiate us… expanding strategic partnerships in the automotive market” .
  • Legacy headwinds: “revenues from our legacy business are declining faster than anticipated… focus on securing new partnerships in our target market – automotive – to secure future growth” .
  • Liquidity and positioning: Working capital $26.2M and cash/AR $12.2M (excl. patent cash collected in October) provide stability to execute the strategy .

Q&A Highlights

  • No Q3 2025 earnings call transcript was available; no Q&A highlights to report from company materials in our set.

Estimates Context

  • S&P Global consensus for revenue and EPS was unavailable for NEON for Q3 2025 (as well as recent quarters/years), suggesting limited or no sell-side coverage; therefore, comparisons to Street were not possible. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
  • Any models covering NEON should treat the $15.5M patent gain as non-recurring and focus on run-rate revenue trajectories, opex discipline, and the cadence of design wins in automotive MultiSensing .

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • The quarter’s profitability is non-recurring: the $15.5M patent gain is the primary driver of earnings; underlying operations remain loss-making with persistent cash burn from operations .
  • Core revenue pressure intensified, with 48.7% YoY decline and sharp NRE drop, reflecting printer and auto infotainment softness; near-term revenue visibility is limited until new customers shift from deployment to production .
  • Strategic reset underway: zForce moved to maintenance; execution capital shifting to MultiSensing AI for automotive and select verticals—watch for partnership announcements and program ramps as stock drivers .
  • Balance sheet runway improved post-quarter via the October patent cash receipt; working capital at quarter-end was robust, enabling continued investment in go-to-market and R&D while pursuing licensing opportunities .
  • Legal/IP can be a catalyst: Apple case stay lifted (Sep 15, 2025) may reintroduce optionality and headline risk/opportunity; monitor case milestones .
  • With no formal guidance and no identifiable Street consensus, trading may hinge on incremental updates: design-win cadence, production ramps, and additional IP monetization. Near-term, expect high sensitivity to any auto program transitions and legal developments .
  • For medium-term thesis, the pivot’s success depends on converting MultiSensing proof points into scalable production programs; cost control and partnering velocity will be key while legacy revenue decline runs its course .