Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

IC

Ingevity Corp (NGVT)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q4 2024 revenue fell 20% YoY to $298.8M as planned exits of lower‑margin markets in Performance Chemicals weighed on sales, but adjusted EBITDA more than doubled YoY to $80.6M with margins expanding to 27.0% on cost actions and mix improvement; GAAP EPS was $0.46 and adjusted EPS was $0.95 .
  • Sequentially, revenue declined vs Q3 (seasonality/PC exits) while adjusted EBITDA pulled back to $80.6M from $106.4M, with margin down ~120 bps QoQ to 27.0% from 28.2% .
  • 2025 guidance: sales $1.3B–$1.4B, adjusted EBITDA $400M–$415M, free cash flow $220M–$260M; target net leverage below 2.8x by Q4 2025; guidance excludes any impact from strategic alternatives for Industrial Specialties/CTO refinery .
  • Strategic and cash catalysts: PC repositioning delivered a $20.4M YoY improvement in PC segment EBITDA in Q4; working capital discipline drove Q4 FCF of $39.6M and net leverage improvement to 3.5x; the strategic alternatives review for Industrial Specialties could further streamline and re-rate the portfolio .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

  • What Went Well

    • Performance Materials delivered another strong quarter: Q4 sales +2% YoY to $156.2M; EBITDA $78.3M; margin 50.1%, supported by operational efficiency and lower energy spend; FY margins reached 52.3% (+340 bps) .
    • PC repositioning showing traction: Q4 Performance Chemicals EBITDA improved by $20.4M YoY to $(3.8)M as plant closures and cost savings reduced costs despite a 44% sales decline tied to exits of lower‑margin markets .
    • Cash generation and deleveraging: Q4 operating cash flow $64.5M and FCF $39.6M despite paying the second $50M CTO termination installment; net leverage improved to 3.5x from 4.0x in Q3 .
    • Management tone: “We remain focused on…execution excellence, reducing leverage, and portfolio optimization,” highlighting momentum and execution confidence (Interim CEO) .
  • What Went Wrong

    • Topline contraction: Q4 revenue down 20% YoY to $298.8M driven by Performance Chemicals exits; Road Technologies also declined 9% due to weather, and APT margin compressed on adverse price/mix .
    • Sequential normalization: Adjusted EBITDA decreased sequentially to $80.6M from $106.4M in Q3; PM margin dipped ~100 bps YoY to 50.1% on lower plant utilization versus last year .
    • Continued PC headwinds near term: High-cost CTO inventory consumption now expected by Q2 2025 (slipped from prior expectation of end Q1), while competitive pricing offsets part of the raw material tailwind .

Financial Results

Quarterly performance (oldest → newest)

MetricQ2 2024Q3 2024Q4 2024
Revenue ($M)$390.6 $376.9 $298.8
Adjusted EBITDA ($M)$101.3 $106.4 $80.6
Adjusted EBITDA Margin (%)25.9% 28.2% 27.0%
Diluted EPS (GAAP)$(7.81) $(2.95) $0.46
Diluted Adjusted EPS$1.01 $1.10 $0.95

Q4 YoY and vs estimates

MetricQ4 2023Q4 2024YoYVs. Estimates
Revenue ($M)$371.7 $298.8 -20% Unavailable (S&P Global data not retrieved due to access limits)
Adjusted EBITDA ($M)$42.1 (revised) $80.6 +91% Unavailable (S&P Global data not retrieved due to access limits)
Diluted Adjusted EPS$(0.20) (revised) $0.95 N/M Unavailable (S&P Global data not retrieved due to access limits)

Segment sales and profitability (Q4 2024 vs Q4 2023)

SegmentQ4 2023 Sales ($M)Q4 2024 Sales ($M)Q4 2023 EBITDA ($M)Q4 2024 EBITDA ($M)
Performance Materials$152.8 $156.2 $78.1 $78.3
Performance Chemicals (total)$176.5 $98.7 $(24.2) $(3.8)
- Road Technologies$53.4 $48.5
- Industrial Specialties$123.1 $50.2
Advanced Polymer Technologies$42.4 $43.9 $7.9 $6.1

Cash flow and balance sheet KPIs (oldest → newest)

KPIQ2 2024Q3 2024Q4 2024
Operating Cash Flow ($M)$29.7 $46.5 $64.5
Free Cash Flow ($M)$11.6 $28.5 $39.6
Net Leverage (Net Debt / LTM Adj. EBITDA)4.0x 4.0x 3.5x
Capex ($M)$18.1 $18.0 $24.9

Notes and adjustments

  • SEC-driven revisions: NGVT revised prior non-GAAP to stop excluding certain inventory charges; Q4’23 adjusted EBITDA revised to $42.1M (from $61.8M), and Q4’23 diluted adjusted EPS to $(0.20) .
  • Non-GAAP definitions and reconciliations provided in the release and 8-K .

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Sales ($B)FY 2024$1.40–$1.50B (affirmed Oct 29, 2024) Actual $1.406B Delivered near low end
Adjusted EBITDA ($M)FY 2024$350–$360M (affirmed Oct 29, 2024) Actual $362.7M Slight beat vs top end
Sales ($B)FY 2025N/A (prelim view only)$1.3–$1.4B New formal guidance
Adjusted EBITDA ($M)FY 2025“Slightly above $400M” (Jan 16, 2025 prelim) $400–$415M Tightened with range
Free Cash Flow ($M)FY 2025N/A$220–$260M New
Net LeverageFY 2025 (Exit)N/A<2.8x by Q4’25 New
Tax RateFY 2025N/A22%–24% New
Capex ($M)FY 2025N/A$50–$70M New
Performance Materials EBITDA marginFY 2025N/A~50% New
Advanced Polymer Technologies EBITDA marginFY 2025N/A~20% New
Performance Chemicals EBITDA marginFY 2025N/AMid‑ to high‑single digits New
High‑cost CTO inventory depletionTimingEnd Q1’25 (prior expectation) Q2’25 Later

All FY 2025 guidance excludes any impact from strategic alternatives for Industrial Specialties/CTO refinery .

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q2 2024 and Q3 2024)Current Period (Q4 2024 call)Trend
Performance Chemicals repositioning and costsQ2: CTO contract terminated; work through high-cost CTO by end Q1’25; PC profitability to improve from Q2’25 . Q3: $84M savings realized YTD, PC margin improvement .CTO depletion now Q2’25; PC pricing aligned to market; 2025 PC margins mid‑ to high‑single digits .Execution improving; timing modestly later
Automotive mix (hybrids vs EVs) and PM demandPM growth on hybrids, operational gains; Q3 PM margin 53.3% .Hybrids gaining share; PM margins targeted ~50% in 2025; regional mix dynamics reiterated .Supportive auto mix; margins durable
Tariffs/macroNot emphasized in Q2. Q3 broadly cited macro/FX/industrial weakness .Tariff outlook uncertain; no current impact seen; monitoring for potential demand effects .Watch item; no current headwind
APT price/mix and margin stabilityQ2: 20.5% margin on price concessions; Q3: 20.1% margin, volumes up .2025 margin guided ~20%; innovation runway in bioplastics .Stable; selective pricing persists
Battery materials/Nexeon initiativeLimited detail earlier.PM R&D focus on silicon-anode battery applications via Nexeon investment .Emerging optionality
Working capital/FCF disciplineQ2: modest FCF; Q3: FCF $28.5M .Q4 FCF $39.6M; 2025 FCF $220–$260M; no repeat of 2024 WC tailwind .FCF ramping; mix shift aiding cash

Management Commentary

  • “Ingevity’s management team and Board have taken aggressive actions to improve performance and our stronger than expected results are evidence of our solid execution.” – Interim CEO Luis Fernandez‑Moreno .
  • “Performance Materials had its best year yet… The segment achieved record sales and EBITDA due to increased volumes, improved price and mix, and lower costs.” – Interim CEO .
  • “We generated over $50 million of free cash flow in a year where we had $200 million of repositioning cash costs… we ended the year at 3.5x net leverage.” – Interim CEO .
  • “Adjusted EBITDA margin improved 350 bps to 25.8% as our repositioning actions had their desired effect, driving a higher mix of revenue from our more profitable businesses and…cost reductions.” – CFO .
  • “We expect Performance Chemicals to generate EBITDA margins in the mid‑ to high single digits [in 2025]… prices reduced to align with market prices will mostly offset lower CTO costs.” – CFO .

Q&A Highlights

  • PC pricing and CTO inventory: Prices already aligned to market CTO; profitability should improve as high-cost CTO is consumed by Q2’25, though price reductions offset part of the benefit .
  • Auto mix: Industry forecasts indicate stronger hybrids vs EVs, favorable for NGVT content and PM demand .
  • Tariffs: Uncertainty acknowledged; no current impact on NGVT or customers; monitoring potential effects on production and demand .
  • Capex: 2025 spend primarily maintenance/SHE; limited growth capex .
  • PM innovation: Incremental R&D targeted at silicon‑anode battery applications (Nexeon), requiring testing/fine‑tuning .
  • Working capital: 2024 WC reduction was significant; not assumed to repeat in 2025; CTO working capital tailwind likely offset by growth in core businesses .
  • Strategic alternatives logistics: Active inbound interest; potential separation of co‑located assets feasible (condominium model); retain raw material flexibility for Pavement .

Estimates Context

  • S&P Global consensus snapshots for Q4 2024 EPS/Revenue/EBITDA were unavailable at time of analysis due to data access limits; therefore, no explicit beat/miss vs consensus is presented. Where estimates are needed for modeling, please note that consensus values could not be retrieved from S&P Global during this session.
  • Company-reported outcomes for Q4 2024: revenue $298.8M, adjusted EPS $0.95, adjusted EBITDA $80.6M, adjusted EBITDA margin 27.0% .

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Portfolio quality improving: PM now >40% of revenue with structurally higher margins; PC exits and cost actions materially lifted consolidated margins in 2H .
  • Near‑term PC inflection lagged into Q2’25 as high‑cost CTO runs off; pricing competitiveness tempers raw material tailwind—model gradual margin build, not step‑function .
  • 2025 setup: Guidance brackets EBITDA at $400–$415M with FCF $220–$260M and deleveraging to <2.8x—cash generation should be a central narrative/catalyst in 2025 .
  • Strategic alternatives for Industrial Specialties/CTO refinery are a potential unlocking event; any transaction could simplify the portfolio and raise margin/FCF profile (guidance currently excludes such impact) .
  • PM durability: Expect ~50% EBITDA margins in 2025 supported by favorable hybrid/ICE mix and operational efficiencies; watch EU/China regulatory and competitive dynamics longer term .
  • APT steady at ~20% margin with scope to improve on demand recovery and higher‑value bioplastics; pricing remains selective to defend share .
  • Risk monitor: Tariffs/macro uncertainty, industrial demand softness, and execution on PC strategic actions; however, cash discipline and cost control give cushion .