Q3 2024 Earnings Summary
| Metric | YoY Change | Reason |
|---|---|---|
Total Revenue | +5% | The increase to $1,076.3 million was driven by new base rates and customer growth, partially offset by lower energy costs passed on to customers. This reflects the company’s regulatory initiatives that bolster rate-based revenue. |
Operating Income (EBIT) | -6% | Dropping to $218.3 million, EBIT was affected by higher operating expenses (including labor and maintenance) and increased depreciation. These costs outpaced revenue growth, reducing margin expansion and driving the overall decline. |
Corporate & Other Segment Revenue | -75% | Falling to $30.2 million, this segment’s revenue was impacted by fewer third-party transactions and intersegment eliminations. Declines reflect the company’s focus on core regulated operations rather than ancillary corporate revenues. |
Depreciation & Amortization | +28% | Rising to $269.5 million, this expense was propelled by ongoing capital investments in gas and electric infrastructure. Regulatory trackers facilitate partial cost recovery, but higher asset balances still increase depreciation charges. |
Diluted EPS | +6% | Improving to $0.19, EPS benefited from stronger net income tied to rate increases and cost control measures, offset by rising interest and operating expenses. Continued infrastructure investment suggests long-term earnings growth opportunities. |
| Metric | Period | Previous Guidance | Current Guidance | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Adjusted EPS | FY 2024 | $1.70 to $1.74 | $1.70 to $1.74 | no change |
Adjusted EPS | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $1.84 to $1.88 | no prior guidance |
Rate Base Growth | 2025-2029 | no prior guidance | 8% to 10% | no prior guidance |
| Topic | Previous Mentions | Current Period | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
Data center growth | Q1 : Strong fundamentals and active developer discussions; Q2 : Significant upside driver; No mention in Q4. | Emphasized as a major opportunity, though not in current financial plans; potential 2025 focus. | Consistent from Q1–Q3; not reiterated in Q4 |
Ongoing regulatory rate cases | Q1 , Q2 , Q4 : Discussed rate filings, settlements, and compliance investments. | Provided updates on PA, KY, IN, OH, VA cases; noted rising compliance costs. | Mentioned in all quarters; ongoing focus on approvals and cost recovery |
Equity issuance and financing | Q1 , Q2 , Q4 : Repeated emphasis on ATM issuance, junior subordinated debt, and preserving credit metrics. | Fully financed base plan; $1.8B upside might need modest equity. | Consistent highlighting of financing needs and potential equity issuance |
Reaffirmed 6%–8% EPS growth | Q1 : Reaffirmed confidence; Q2 : Reaffirmed with caution on higher range; Q4 : Reaffirmed at ~7.5% growth. | Reaffirmed guidance; no explicit caution on higher end. | Generally stable guidance; only Q2 notes caution on upper range |
Upside capital expenditures | Q1 : ~$1.6B of upside noted; Q2 : Potential up to $2B; Q4 : Additional renewables and grid work, possibly ~$2B. | Increased to $1.8B for projects (electric, PHMSA, legacy infrastructure). | Continuing expansion of upside CapEx across periods |
Manufacturing reshoring | Q1 : Cited as an economic development driver (e.g., Intel project); no reference in Q2, Q4. | Not mentioned in Q3. | Mentioned only in Q1; dropped from later discussions |
Lower Pennsylvania ROE outcomes | Q2 : Raised concern regarding lower ROE precedent; not referenced in Q1 or Q4. | No mention in Q3. | New concern in Q2, never reiterated |
Shift in sentiment around data centers | Q1 : Positive load growth outlook; Q2 : Growing caution around financing despite enthusiasm; no mention in Q4. | Recognized potential equity burden; still a growth opportunity. | Cautionary tone added in Q2–Q3 regarding financing implications |
Potential large-impact areas | Q1 : Focus on renewables, data center load, stakeholder alignment; Q2 : Emphasis on data centers and gen projects; Q4 : Similar themes. | Data centers, renewable buildouts, and regulatory approvals deemed key drivers. | Consistently identified as critical growth levers in all mentions |
-
Data Center Investments and CapEx Impact
Q: What's driving data center opportunities and CapEx impact?
A: NiSource sees data center investments as a significant incremental opportunity, primarily a 2025 activity. They're progressing discussions with counterparties in a disciplined manner. The existing $19.3 billion capital plan is fully financed, but the $1.8 billion of potential upside CapEx, mainly from data centers, may require modest equity depending on cash flow and regulatory mechanisms. These investments are not in the base plan but may impact financing needs when incorporated. , -
Equity Financing Needs with Increased CapEx
Q: Will increased CapEx require more equity financing?
A: The base $19.3 billion capital plan is fully financed without additional equity. However, the potential $1.8 billion in upside CapEx for data centers may necessitate modest equity based on project cash flows and sequencing. The company has been optimizing capital allocation, minimizing regulatory lag, and improving cash flow from operations to support financing needs. , -
2.6 GW Data Center Load in IRP
Q: Can you provide details on the 2.6 GW data center load in the IRP?
A: The 2,600 megawatts in the IRP reflects potential generation assets needed, including investments in storage and combined cycle gas turbines (CCGTs). The IRP includes multiple scenarios, covering a range of outcomes up to 6,000 megawatts. Specific details on the cost per kilowatt and ownership structures are not available at this time. These resources are crucial to meet accreditation methodologies and dispatchable resource needs in the MISO region. , , -
Microsoft Data Center Project Timing
Q: What's the status and timing of the Microsoft data center project?
A: The data center activity, including the Microsoft project announced last year, is primarily a 2025 activity. NiSource is working methodically with counterparties to finalize plans. Infrastructure investments in generation and transmission will be required to support this load demand. , , -
Flat O&M Guidance Extension
Q: Can you maintain flat O&M with increased CapEx?
A: NiSource expects to keep O&M expenses flat by improving efficiency and effectiveness. Initiatives like Project Apollo are enhancing operations, and there's a focus on digital transformation and process improvements. The company believes there's significant opportunity to continue this trend into the foreseeable future despite capital program growth. -
MISO Capacity Auction Impact
Q: How will MISO capacity auction changes affect you?
A: As a vertically integrated utility, NIPSCO is responsible for generation, transmission, and distribution, which helps mitigate risks from MISO capacity market changes. The company is planning resource additions to balance supply and demand, and is engaged in conversations with regulators and stakeholders through the IRP process to address accreditation reductions and resource needs. , -
Gas Demand Growth and CapEx Increase
Q: What's driving gas demand and CapEx increase?
A: NiSource is seeing gas demand growth, especially in Virginia and Central Ohio, with net customer additions around 1%. The increase in the gas CapEx plan is due to system hardening work, including bare steel and first-generation plastic replacement programs, in-line inspections, and compliance with upcoming PHMSA regulations. The capital increase is driven by additional work, not higher costs for existing work. , -
Critical Gas Generation Infrastructure Steps
Q: Are you taking steps for critical gas generation infrastructure?
A: NiSource is adequately planning and positioning itself to meet demand requirements, including infrastructure needs for data centers. While specifics aren't disclosed, the company is leveraging its proximity to gas supplies like the Utica and Marcellus Shales, which is a critical advantage in facilitating these projects. , -
Generation Needs Regardless of Data Centers
Q: What generation is needed if data centers don't materialize?
A: Regardless of data center load, the IRP indicates a need for additional resources such as storage (between 500 megawatts and 1 gigawatt) and dispatchable resources like gas turbines or peakers to meet MISO accreditation and reliability requirements. These additions are mostly projected beyond 2029, aligning with EPA rules and accreditation methodologies. -
Templeton Wind Project in Base Plan
Q: Is Templeton Wind now in your base plan?
A: Yes, the Templeton Wind project has been moved from the upside to the base capital plan. This reflects NiSource's ongoing efforts to maximize benefits to customers and stakeholders through company-owned generation assets and is subject to regulatory approval.