NE
Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 revenue rose ~6% q/q to $150.5M (upper end of guide) and +6% y/y; adjusted EBITDA improved ~17% q/q to $16.5M, while net loss narrowed to $(7.1)M and diluted EPS of $(0.18) .
- Nine outperformed a flat U.S. rig count via cementing share gains (cementing jobs +11% q/q; revenue +~4%) and much higher coiled tubing utilization (revenue +~16% q/q), offset by Northeast wireline pricing resets; management flagged new tariff headwinds and emerging Permian pricing pressure in May .
- Liquidity improved with a new $125M ABL facility (maturity to May 2028, $50M accordion) that adds borrowing base availability and lowers covenant triggers; total Q1 liquidity was $53.8M (cash $17.3M + $36.5M ABL availability) .
- Q2 outlook: management expects both revenue and adjusted EBITDA down q/q; guided Q2 revenue to $138–$148M given lower oil prices and tariff cost pressure (pricing pressure noted in Permian) .
- Additional stock overhang: NYSE price deficiency notice (potential reverse split to regain compliance) and ongoing market cap plan; shares continue trading with a “.BC” designation during cure period .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Strong execution vs market: “we increased our revenue by approximately 6%, with revenue coming in the upper end of the originally provided guidance… incremental adjusted EBITDA margins ~26%” (Ann Fox) .
- Operational wins: coiled tubing utilization drove revenue +~16% q/q; cementing jobs +~11% with revenue +~4% despite flat rig count (Ann Fox; CFO detail) .
- Liquidity upgrade: closed new $125M ABL, extending revolver maturity and adding availability; “significantly increases our liquidity and financial flexibility” (CFO) .
-
What Went Wrong
- Tariff and pricing headwinds: management began seeing pricing pressure in Permian in May and expects tariff cost increases (steel/aluminum) to impact wireline guns, coiled tubing reels, and tool components .
- Regional pressure: Northeast wireline stage pricing reset lower on 2024 bids amid weak gas prices (pricing “mostly stable” ex-NE) .
- Profitability/FCF: still loss-making (net loss $(7.1)M) and used $(5.3)M cash in operating activities in Q1; interest burden remains high on 13% notes .
Financial Results
Service-line revenue breakdown (Q1 2025):
Selected KPIs (Q1 2025):
Liquidity and balance sheet (Q1 2025):
Guidance Changes
Notes: Q1 2025 revenue achieved upper end of original Q1 guide ($146–$152M) . Management did not provide quantitative margin/EPS guidance for Q2.
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We generated adjusted EBITDA of $16.5 million, an increase of approximately 17% quarter-over-quarter… driven in large part by increased activity from our market share gains, most specifically within cementing… coiled tubing… increased revenue by approximately 16% quarter-over-quarter.” — Ann Fox .
- “The recent decline in oil price in conjunction with increased costs due to tariffs has created uncertainty… we anticipate both revenue and adjusted EBITDA to decline compared to Q1 and project Q2 revenue between $138 million and $148 million.” — Ann Fox .
- “The new ABL will provide us with $125 million of commitments and a $50 million uncommitted accordion… provides ~ $22 million of incremental covenant compliant liquidity… extends the previous maturity by ~9 months… will increase annual cash interest expense by approximately $1 million.” — Guy Sirkes .
- “We have seen stage price reductions in the Northeast… repriced work for 2025 bids… Coiled tubing revenue increased by approximately 16% this quarter. Utilization was significantly higher in Q1 versus Q4.” — Ann Fox .
Q&A Highlights
- Pricing/tariffs: Pricing pressure mainly in West Texas/Permian; magnitude too early to quantify; tariffs are transparent and intended to be passed through to customers (wireline guns, coiled tubing reels, tool components) .
- Outlook calibration: Q2 guide incorporates uncertainty from oil price declines, OPEC production signals, and pending trade policy developments; April was strong, but June visibility lower (management taking conservative stance) .
- Gas basins: No immediate reallocation of equipment; positioned to benefit as gas activity improves; maintained presence through 2024 downturn .
- Technology/long laterals: Longer laterals and complexity supportive of premium plug demand; continued innovation in dissolvables; international tool sales seen as a “bright spot” (no intent to scale heavy international services) .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 vs S&P Global consensus: Revenue beat slightly; EPS missed slightly; EBITDA below consensus.
Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global. Note: Company-reported Adjusted EBITDA was $16.5M; GAAP EBITDA reconciled to ~$14.4M, explaining divergence vs EBITDA consensus approach .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Execution outpaced market: Share gains in cementing and higher coiled tubing utilization lifted revenue/EBITDA despite flat rigs; this mix tailwind could persist if cementing share holds or expands .
- Near-term reset: Q2 guide embeds weaker oil price/pricing and tariff headwinds; expect sequential revenue/EBITDA decline with Permian pressure; monitor pass-through success on tariffs in wireline/tools .
- Optionality in gas: Natural gas price recovery has not yet translated into activity; Nine is well-positioned across Haynesville/Appalachia if completions pick up in 2H25–2026 .
- Liquidity improved: New $125M ABL extends runway and adds availability, though higher ABL interest adds ~+$1M annual cash interest; 13% 2028 notes remain the key overhang .
- Stock technicals: NYSE listing deficiency (price and earlier market cap) is a potential catalyst for reverse split and a near-term sentiment overhang until compliance is restored .
- Watchlist into Q2: Permian pricing, tariff pass-through pace, gas basin activity, tool sales (domestic/international), and working capital/cash conversion given Q1 operating cash outflow .
- Medium-term thesis: If commodity backdrop stabilizes and gas basins recover, Nine’s cementing share gains, technology-led tool portfolio, and improved liquidity could drive operating leverage and improved ROIC vs 2024 baselines .