AC
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC (NLY)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Annaly delivered EAD per share of $0.73, modestly above consensus $0.712, and once again covered the $0.70 dividend; book value fell 3% to $18.45 and economic return was 0.7% for Q2 . Consensus EPS figures from S&P Global marked with * below.
- Net interest margin expanded to 1.71% XPAA and net interest spread to 1.47% XPAA, reflecting higher asset yields (5.41%) and slightly higher economic funding costs (3.94%) .
- Agency MBS portfolio grew ~6% QoQ to $71.76B with a 92% hedge ratio, while Residential Credit executed a record seven securitizations ($3.6B) and MSR value held at ~$3.28B; GAAP leverage ticked up to 7.1x; economic leverage 5.8x .
- Management reiterated confidence in sustaining dividend coverage and highlighted potential catalysts from bank/foreign demand returning to agency MBS with policy easing and regulatory reform; Q3-to-date book value up ~0.5% pre-div accrual (“~1.5% economic return”) per Q&A .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Agency allocation increased at attractive spreads, supported by accretive ATM equity raises (~$761M) and tight risk management: “Agency portfolio grew by nearly $5 billion…” and leverage/hedges adapted to volatility .
- Residential Credit achieved record quarterly securitization issuance (seven deals, $3.6B), strong correspondent channel ($5.3B locks; $3.7B fundings), and resilient investor demand; recent non-QM AAA print at 138 bps illustrated market depth .
- MSR portfolio produced “well‑defined, durable cash flows,” aided by technology‑driven servicing cost declines and rising float balances; MSR remained conservatively priced with stable delinquencies and CPR .
What Went Wrong
- Book value per share decreased 3% QoQ to $18.45 amid long-end rate pressure and wider agency MBS spreads early in quarter; GAAP leverage rose to 7.1x .
- Swap income moderated due to modest swap runoff; economic funding cost rose 6 bps QoQ to 3.94%, partially offsetting stronger asset yields .
- Housing affordability headwinds persisted (higher rates, prices, taxes/insurance), with management expecting modestly negative HPA near term; credit standards tightened further to mitigate risk .
Financial Results
Income, EPS, Book Value (GAAP and EAD)
Margins and Spread
Balance Sheet Leverage and Hedging
Segment/Portfolio Composition (Period-End)
Results vs. Wall Street Consensus (S&P Global)
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Guidance Changes
No formal quantitative guidance provided for revenue, margins, OpEx, OI&E, or tax rate in Q2 communications.
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “Annaly delivered its seventh consecutive quarter with a positive economic return… Our Agency portfolio grew by nearly $5 billion… Residential Credit experienced another record quarter… Meanwhile, our MSR portfolio continued to generate substantial cash flow…” .
- CEO prepared remarks: “We delivered an economic return of 0.7% for the second quarter, while generating EAD of $0.73, once again out‑earning our dividend… leverage increased modestly to 5.8x” .
- CFO: “Earnings available for distribution per share increased by $0.01 to $0.73… driven by higher yields (5.41%) and lower average repo rates (4.53%)… Net interest spread XPAA increased to 1.47%… Net interest margin XPAA is 1.71%” .
- Agency portfolio activity: “Added agency MBS… purchases split across 4.5s, 5.5s, and 6s… preferred pools over TBAs” .
- Dividend stance: “We expect to certainly cover and potentially out‑earn the dividend for the remainder of the year” .
Q&A Highlights
- Book value update: “As of last night, pre‑dividend accrual book was up about half a percent… ~1.5% economic return” .
- Dividend coverage: Management expects to cover/out‑earn dividend through the year .
- Portfolio risk/leverage: Preference to raise accretive equity and keep leverage lower for smoother returns; disciplined duration bands through volatility .
- Credit quality: Tightened credit box since 2022; MTM LTV ~62%; a 20% HPA shock would leave ~4% of portfolio underwater; D60+ at 1.85% .
- Agency demand: FI fund inflows strong; CMOs absorbing supply; spreads could tighten 3–5 bps even without banks/foreign; easing/reg reform could be material catalyst .
- Non‑QM market depth: Year‑to‑date gross issuance ~$92B, tracking to best since 2021; recent AAA sold at 138 bps, margins mid‑teens on retained capital .
- Macro scenario: Base case two Fed cuts; if cuts don’t materialize, curve flattening is hedged; more aggressive easing would benefit agency MBS .
Estimates Context
- EPS (EAD per share) beat: Q2 2025 actual $0.73 vs consensus $0.7117*; Q1 2025 $0.72 vs $0.6976*; Q4 2024 $0.72 vs $0.6674*.
- Revenue (SPGI “total revenue”) missed in Q2 and Q1 (Q2 actual $157.2M* vs $237.0M*; Q1 $244.5M* vs $418.5M*), but beat in Q4 ($539.1M* vs $367.6M*). For mREITs, EAD is the primary performance metric and the anchor for dividend coverage, which management emphasized . Consensus/actual values marked with * are from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- EAD beat consensus and covered dividend again; management’s explicit confidence in sustaining coverage is supportive for income‑focused holders .
- Margin expansion (XPAA NIM/spread) reflects coupon rotation and improved asset yields; incremental funding cost uptick bears watching but is manageable at current leverage .
- Agency MBS remains the near‑term overweight with catalysts from potential Fed easing and regulatory reform; a re‑emergence of bank/foreign demand could drive spread tightening .
- Residential Credit execution is a differentiator (record securitizations, tightened credit box, resilient investor base); downside HPA scenarios appear contained given high borrower equity .
- MSR provides durable cash flows and negative duration ballast; technology‑driven servicing cost reductions and higher float income support valuations .
- Near‑term trading: Positive EAD/dvd coverage and potential agency spread tightening are constructive; monitor long‑end rates and swap income run‑off for BV sensitivities .
- Medium‑term thesis: Diversified housing finance model (Agency/RESI/MSR) with low leverage and ample liquidity positions Annaly to deliver competitive risk‑adjusted returns across cycles .