NC
NUCOR CORP (NUE)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 delivered sequential improvement: revenue $8.46B, EBITDA $1.30B, and diluted EPS $2.60; revenue and EBITDA exceeded consensus, while EPS was roughly in line-to-slightly above the mean, supported by higher sheet and plate pricing and record sheet shipments . Q2 revenue $8.46B vs S&P Global consensus $8.41B*, EBITDA $1.30B vs $1.23B*, EPS $2.60 vs $2.64* (rounded) — net effect a modest beat on revenue/EBITDA and essentially in line on EPS .*
- All three segments improved vs Q1: steel mills pre‑tax earnings rose to $843M (from $231M), steel products to $392M (from $288M), and raw materials to $57M (from $29M) .
- Management guides Q3 earnings “nominally lower” on expected steel mill margin compression despite resilient demand and healthy backlogs; this is the main near‑term risk/catalyst for the stock narrative .
- Operating rates climbed to 85% (vs 80% in Q1 and 75% in Q2’24), shipments to outside customers held at ~6.82M tons, and mills backlog ended Q2 at ~3.7M tons (+30% YoY), reflecting robust end‑market demand across infrastructure, energy and data centers .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Record operational execution: “our sheet‑making group shipped nearly 3.1 million tons during the second quarter, marking the second consecutive quarter where the sheet group has set a new shipment record” (CEO) .
- Brandenburg plate mill achieved positive EBITDA, with record production and shipments; approvals for line pipe supply broaden the opportunity set (EVP Plate) .
- Steel products segment delivered strong results and healthy backlog; pre‑tax earnings rose 28% q/q to $392M, with LTM segment margins around 16% and contribution ~45% of total pre‑tax segment earnings (CEO/CFO) .
What Went Wrong
- Guidance for Q3 calls for margin compression in steel mills, leading to “nominally lower” consolidated earnings vs Q2 despite stable volumes/pricing — a near‑term headwind .
- Working capital build drove negative free cash flow in 1H; management expects a “dramatic change” to FCF in 2H as capex moderates and WC normalizes (CFO) .
- Energy costs remain elevated (~$40/ton YoY up; sequentially down), contributing to conversion cost pressure in steel mills (CFO) .
Financial Results
Consolidated P&L and EBITDA (actuals)
Margins (S&P Global)
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Actual vs Wall Street Consensus (S&P Global)
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Segment Breakdown (pre‑tax earnings, $USD Millions)
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Nucor generated EBITDA of approximately $1.3 billion and earned $2.60 per diluted share... driven by higher average selling prices in our steel mill segment and stable realized pricing and higher volumes in our steel product segment” (CEO) .
- “Steel mills backlog at the end of the second quarter was up nearly 30% over this time last year… our published consumer spot price for HRC has been within a 5% band around $900 a ton for the past 16 weeks” (CFO) .
- “We expect Nucor’s consolidated earnings to be nominally lower than in the second quarter. In the steel mill segment… modest margin compression compared to the second quarter” (CFO) .
- “Pre‑operating and startup cost came down quite a bit quarter over quarter… model $140–$150 million per quarter for the back half” (CFO) .
- “Energy costs are up a little bit year over year… a little over $40 a ton in our steelmaking” (CFO) .
Q&A Highlights
- Steel mills margin compression in Q3: driven by tariff effects (Brazil slabs, DRI/pig iron) and backlog price lag; mitigation includes self‑supply, diversified sourcing, and flexible substrate strategy (CEO/CFO) .
- Start‑up costs trajectory: Brandenburg’s EBITDA positivity lowers pre‑op overhang; plan ~$140–$150M per quarter in 2H (CFO) .
- Working capital/FCF: ~$620M operating WC use in Q2; set up for “dramatic” FCF improvement in 2H as WC/capex pivot (CFO) .
- Segment cadence: steel products stable overall with tubular/joist & deck mixed; raw materials similar to Q2; beams at near historic highs with large backlogs (CEO/CFO) .
- Energy and data center demand: structural/data center orders strong; towers business ramping with national footprint; transmission orders climbing (CEO/EVP) .
Estimates Context
- Q2 beats/in‑line: Revenue $8.46B vs $8.41B* and EBITDA $1.30B vs $1.23B* were above consensus; EPS $2.60 was essentially in line with consensus $2.64* — a small delta likely driven by mix and noncontrolling interests .*
- Prior periods: Q1 2025 delivered beats vs consensus on revenue ($7.83B vs $7.26B*) and GAAP EPS ($0.67 vs $0.66*); Q2 2024 was above consensus on both revenue and EPS .*
- Revisions outlook: Near‑term (Q3) estimate revisions may edge down on steel mill margin compression commentary; medium‑term revisions could skew up as mills/core products benefit from tariff enforcement, growing backlogs, and 2H FCF inflection (management’s constructive demand view) .*
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Q2 was solid with a modest revenue/EBITDA beat and strong sequential improvement across segments; the quarter supports resilience in core demand and NUE’s diversified earnings base .
- Near‑term caution: management signaled Q3 margin compression in steel mills despite stable volumes/pricing — expect consensus to drift lower for Q3 EPS; monitor tariff implementation timing and substrate cost impacts .
- Medium‑term constructive: robust backlogs (~3.7M tons), infrastructure/data center/energy transmission demand, and tariff enforcement underpin pricing stability and volumes into 2026 .
- Execution catalysts: Brandenburg’s positive EBITDA, towers ramp (Alabama Sept; Indiana by Q1’26), and coating lines (Crawfordsville end‑2025; Berkeley mid‑2026) extend value‑added mix and margin durability .
- Capital allocation: FY25 capex ~$3B reaffirmed; 2H FCF expected to improve as WC/capex moderate; continued buybacks (1.8M shares in Q2; $606M authorization remaining) and dividend $0.55 support returns .
- Trading implications: any downside guide for Q3 could pressure shares short‑term; strength in steel products/backlogs and policy tailwinds (232 tariffs, OBBB legislative incentives) are supportive medium‑term .
- Watchlist items: HRC trajectory, Brazil tariff implementation (slabs/DRI), energy costs, WC release pace, and towers/data center order flow translating to margins and EBITDA in 2H’25–2026 .