Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Jolie Kahn

Chief Financial Officer at Ocean Biomedical
Executive

About Jolie Kahn

Jolie Kahn served as Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of Ocean Biomedical (OCEA) through August 5, 2025, when she resigned without disagreement; she had been acting as CFO at least as early as May 30, 2024 based on multiple SEC signatures and Sarbanes-Oxley certifications . She is 60 years old and holds a BA from Cornell University and a J.D. magna cum laude from Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, with a career spanning corporate finance, securities law, and public company audits; she also serves as U.S. securities counsel for OCEA . During her tenure, management disclosed material weakness remediation efforts that included hiring her as CFO to strengthen disclosure controls, processes, and GAAP reporting . The proxy and company filings do not disclose executive TSR, revenue growth, or EBITDA growth metrics tied to her compensation .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
GlucoTrack, Inc.Interim CFO2019–2023Led corporate finance and public company audit preparation; extensive involvement in periodic filings and financial statements .
Jolie Kahn, Esq.Proprietor (corporate & securities law)2002–presentStructured and negotiated multi-million-dollar debt/equity financings, M&A; U.S. securities counsel to OCEA on a limited basis .

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
AgriForce Growing Systems, Ltd.CEO (part-time)Since June 2024Executive leadership; ongoing part-time role concurrent with OCEA CFO tenure .

Fixed Compensation

  • The proxy states: “There are no written agreements with the current CEO and CFO,” and does not provide base salary, target bonus, or bonus outcomes for the CFO; executive compensation tables are not populated with CFO specifics .

Performance Compensation

  • OCEA sought shareholder approval for a 2025 Equity Incentive Plan reserving 30,000,000 shares, enabling grants of Options, Warrants, Restricted Stock, RSUs, and Preferred Stock; awards may be time- and/or performance-based, but no CFO-specific metrics, weightings, or targets were disclosed .
  • Change-in-control mechanics in the plan allow Committee discretion to accelerate vesting and/or cash-out awards upon a qualifying transaction; this is plan-level, not CFO-specific .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

  • The beneficial ownership table in the 2025 proxy lists directors and certain executives but does not provide an individual line for the CFO; thus, total beneficial ownership, pledged shares, and vested/unvested breakdown for Ms. Kahn are not disclosed .
  • As of the record date (Feb 21, 2025), OCEA had 140,584,743 common shares outstanding; this frames potential ownership calculations, but CFO-specific holdings remain undisclosed .

Employment Terms

  • Employment agreement: None; “There are no written agreements with the current CEO and CFO” (no severance, bonus multiples, or explicit change‑of‑control protections via contract) .
  • Start/tenure evidence: CFO role evidenced by SEC signatures on multiple 8‑Ks in 2024 and Q1‑2025 SOX certifications; resignation effective August 5, 2025 with no disagreement .
  • Internal controls: Management cited hiring Ms. Kahn to remediate material weaknesses in disclosure controls and GAAP reporting .
  • Non‑compete, non‑solicit, garden leave, clawbacks, tax gross‑ups, deferred comp, pensions/SERP, perquisites: Not disclosed in the proxy .

Say‑on‑Pay & Equity Plan Votes (March 28, 2025 Annual Meeting)

ProposalForAgainstAbstainBroker Non‑Vote
2025 Equity Compensation Plan28,773,654 4,136,878 121,825 26,758,574
Say‑on‑Pay (Advisory)29,233,497 3,583,347 215,513 26,758,574
Say‑on‑Pay FrequencyOne Year: 1,788,193 Two Years: 3,242,231 Three Years: 27,236,885 Abstain: 765,048

Performance & Track Record

  • CFO certifications: Ms. Kahn executed SOX 302 and 906 certifications on OCEA’s Q1‑2025 Form 10‑Q .
  • Controls remediation: Management disclosed hiring Ms. Kahn as CFO and engaging consultants to remediate material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls .
  • Listing status context: OCEA received multiple Nasdaq deficiency notices in late 2024 and 2025; OCEA later disclosed the CFO’s resignation on August 5, 2025 amidst listing issues (no disagreement) .

Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Contract architecture: Absence of a written employment agreement for the CFO limits transparency on pay mix, severance, and change‑of‑control economics; pay‑for‑performance alignment cannot be evaluated from disclosed data .
  • Equity framework: The 2025 Plan materially increases potential equity issuance capacity (30,000,000 shares) and includes discretionary vesting acceleration in change‑of‑control, but lacks disclosed CFO award grants or performance metric calibration for 2024–2025 .

Related Party & Governance Considerations

  • Dual role: Proxy notes Ms. Kahn “still practices law on a limited basis, including serving as U.S. securities counsel for the Company,” a potential conflict that warrants board oversight (company maintains a related‑party transactions policy) .
  • Director/committee coverage: Ms. Kahn is not listed as a director; audit, compensation, and nominating committees are chaired and composed by other directors per proxy .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment and retention risk: The lack of a CFO employment agreement and undisclosed pay metrics reduce visibility into incentives and severance protections; her short documented tenure culminating in resignation during a period of listing stress elevates continuity risk .
  • Dilution and overhang: The 2025 Plan’s 30,000,000‑share reserve expands equity capacity amid reverse‑split mechanics, potentially increasing future dilution; change‑of‑control acceleration is discretionary at Committee level .
  • Controls remediation: Management tied Ms. Kahn’s hiring to remediation of material weaknesses; effectiveness remains a key fundamental lever for credibility and capital access .
  • Governance watch‑items: Her concurrent role as U.S. securities counsel should be monitored under the related‑party policy; transparency in future proxies on executive pay structure and ownership would improve alignment assessments .