OB
OFG BANCORP (OFG)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- EPS diluted was $1.15, a clear beat vs Wall Street consensus of $1.05, driven by higher average loan balances and solid non-interest income; total core revenues were $182.2M, up 2.2% q/q and 1.5% y/y . EPS beats also occurred in Q1 2025 ($1.00 vs $0.968) and Q4 2024 ($1.09 vs $0.965)*.
- Net interest margin compressed to 5.31% (from 5.42% in Q1), reflecting proactive liquidity build (new $200M FHLB at 4.13%); management expects NIM to expand as loan growth continues .
- Loan growth strong: loans HFI (EOP) reached $8.18B (+4.2% q/q, +7.1% y/y) with new loan production of $783.7M; guidance for FY25 loan growth raised to 5–6% (from 3–4%) .
- Capital actions: Board approved new $100M share repurchase (open-ended); company repurchased 186,024 shares in Q2; dividend maintained at $0.30 per share for the September quarter, payable Oct 15 .
- Estimates context: EPS beat; revenue comparison depends on definition—company “total core revenues” were $182.2M, while S&P revenue actual was $160.7M vs consensus $181.7M, suggesting a miss on S&P’s revenue definition; consensus recommendation unavailable*.
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Strong loan growth across all channels in Puerto Rico and U.S.; pipeline remained robust, contributing to higher net interest income q/q .
- Digital-first momentum: nearly all routine retail transactions processed through digital/self-service; new offerings (Oriental Marketplace; U.S. government money market fund) deepen relationships and drive efficiency. “Nearly all of our routine teller retail customer transactions and deposits… were made through our digital and self-service channels” .
- Credit metrics improved sequentially: net charge-offs down to $12.8M (0.64%), early delinquency 2.46%, total delinquency 3.59%, NPL rate ~1.19% .
What Went Wrong
- NIM contraction to 5.31% due to timing/decision to add wholesale liquidity (FHLB at 4.13%) ahead of expected loan growth .
- Provision for credit losses remained elevated at $21.7M, including $17.2M for volume and $3.7M specific reserves on four commercial loans .
- Pricing pressure in commercial lending and seasonal uptick in early-stage auto delinquencies; management cited competitive loan pricing and noted tariffs briefly boosted auto demand, potentially impacting future mix/spreads .
Financial Results
Summary vs Prior Periods
Non-Interest Income Components
Production, Balances, Liquidity
Loan Portfolio Breakdown (EOP)
KPIs and Credit Quality
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “It was another strong quarter, ending with record assets of more than $12 billion and record loans of more than $8 billion… diluted earnings per share of $1.15… strong loan origination and core deposit flows” .
- CFO on NIM and liquidity: “Excluding the new Federal Home Loan Bank advance, NIM would have been around the higher end of our 5.30%-5.40% range… as loan growth continues, we should see NIM expand” .
- CEO on deposits: “Government deposits are tied to a variable rate treasury bill… we are seeing good momentum… overall retail customer deposits will continue to grow in the second half” .
- CEO on loan growth: “We expect loan balances to grow for the full 2025, now closer to the 5%, 6% versus the 3%, 4% that we previously guided” .
- Capital return: “We announced a new $100 million… buyback authorization and bought back more shares” ; Board approved a new $100M plan .
Q&A Highlights
- Deposit costs: Variable-rate government deposits drove quarter-to-quarter noise; retail deposit growth expected through 2H25 and into 2026; competition from Florida-based bank CDs and U.S. credit unions remains rational .
- Funding strategy/NIM: Added $200M FHLB mid-quarter at 4.13% to pre-fund expected loan growth; NIM expected to expand as liquidity is deployed .
- Loan growth cadence & pricing: Strong pipeline across PR and U.S.; some pricing pressure on commercial lending; auto originations saw pre-tariff pull-forward .
- Credit outlook: Seasonality explains higher early-stage auto delinquency vs Q1; vintages since 2022 performing better, supporting improved NCO/delinquency trajectory .
- Tax rate clarification: FY25 ETR guided to 24.90% excluding discrete items (vs Q1’s 26.14% view); Q2 benefited from $1.7M discrete items .
Estimates Context
- EPS: OFG beat EPS in Q2 ($1.15 vs $1.05), Q1 ($1.00 vs $0.968), and Q4 ($1.09 vs $0.965)*.
- Revenue: Company “total core revenues” were $182.2M in Q2; S&P Global’s revenue actual for Q2 was $160.7M vs consensus $181.7M*, implying a miss under that definition. Note: OFG reports “total core revenues” as net interest income plus core non-interest income; S&P’s revenue methodology may differ materially.
- Target Price Consensus Mean: $48.25*; Consensus recommendation unavailable*.
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- EPS momentum and operational execution are intact; NIM compression appears transitory given targeted liquidity build and rising loan balances—setup for margin expansion in 2H25 as loans absorb funding .
- Commercial lending is the key growth lever (PR and U.S.); management raised FY25 loan growth guidance to 5–6% and cites strong, diversified pipelines—watch for pricing pressure offset by volume .
- Credit quality improved sequentially; vintage improvements since 2022 and seasonality explain auto trends—expect steadier NCO/delinquency trajectory barring macro shocks .
- Capital return remains a catalyst (open-ended $100M buyback; ongoing $0.30 dividend), supported by CET1 13.99% and rising TBVPS—buyback deployment pace could support shares .
- Deposit dynamics manageable: retail growth expected; government deposit cost volatility is a known factor but not thesis-breaking—monitor mix shift and cost trajectory .
- Tactical funding (FHLB, brokered) boosted liquidity; as production remains strong, incremental spread capture should lift NII—track NIM vs 5.30–5.40% range guidance .
- Narrative drivers: digital adoption, fee mix from mortgage/wealth, Puerto Rico macro resilience, and prudently managed risk—any policy/regulatory developments (e.g., energy grid) are noise near term but worth monitoring .