OC
OMEROS CORP (OMER)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2024 GAAP EPS was -$0.54, a beat versus Wall Street consensus of -$0.71; OMIDRIA royalties rose sequentially to $10.1M on Rayner U.S. net sales of $33.6M. Bold beat driven by lower interest expense and stable OpEx . EPS consensus from S&P Global: -$0.71 (3 estimates)*.
- BLA for narsoplimab in TA‑TMA was resubmitted; company expects a six‑month FDA review cycle targeting a September 2025 PDUFA date, with EMA MAA submission planned in 1H25 .
- Year‑end liquidity: $90.1M cash and short‑term investments; 2024 outlays totaled $42.7M (convertible notes repurchase $21.7M, narsoplimab drug substance $19.1M, senior debt transaction $1.9M) .
- Call commentary emphasized robust survival analyses for narsoplimab (hazard ratio 0.32; p<0.00001) and initiation of Phase 3 programs for zaltenibart in PNH; management is preparing for U.S. launch and pursuing ex‑U.S. partnerships .
- Near‑term stock catalysts: FDA acceptance of resubmission and PDUFA clock confirmation, EMA MAA submission, and Phase 3 zaltenibart site activations/head‑to‑head execution; medium‑term: PNH Phase 3 data and potential financing/partnership announcements .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Narsoplimab survival benefit robust across analyses with hazard ratio 0.32 and p<0.00001; management: “results… are robust, consistent, statistically significant, and highly clinically meaningful” .
- Sequential improvement in OMIDRIA royalties ($10.1M vs $9.3M in Q3) and lower interest expense ($3.2M vs $4.1M in Q3), supporting EPS beat .
- Launch readiness: drug supply available for 2–3 years; commercial team relationships across key transplant centers; pricing and reimbursement groundwork (ICD‑10/CPT linkage) underway .
What Went Wrong
- Cash and short‑term investments fell to $90.1M with $29.0M cash used in operations in Q4; 2024 saw $42.7M in significant outlays, pressuring runway .
- Shareholder deficit deepened and OMIDRIA royalty obligation increased (non‑current $195.6M vs $116.6M YE23), reflecting balance sheet strain .
- Revenue remains effectively zero from continuing operations; business reliant on discontinued OMIDRIA royalties and financing until narsoplimab approval and commercialization .
Financial Results
Notes: Omeros records OMIDRIA royalties within discontinued operations and as adjustments to the OMIDRIA contract royalty asset, not as revenue .
Estimate Comparison (Q4 2024):
Values with asterisk (*) retrieved from S&P Global.
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “The results… are robust, consistent, statistically significant, and highly clinically meaningful… primary hazard ratio was 0.32… p‑value well less than 0.00001… e‑value 5.7… possibility of unmeasured confounders is vanishingly small.” – Gregory A. Demopulos, CEO .
- “We have all the drug supply necessary to launch and to support narsoplimab through… two to three years of utilization.” – Gregory A. Demopulos, CEO .
- “Pricing is never final… narsoplimab will deliver significant value… potential to be administered both in inpatient and outpatient settings.” – Nadia Dac, CCO .
- “We are very excited… moving back to being a commercial entity… Omidria brought in net revenues to Omeros north of $1 billion through sales and partnerships and royalty sales.” – Gregory A. Demopulos, CEO .
Q&A Highlights
- Pricing and reimbursement: Directional pricing to reflect survival benefit; dual inpatient/outpatient administration pathways; final pricing TBD .
- Safety and Phase 3 design for zaltenibart: No liver toxicity signal observed; exclusion of confounding pre‑existing liver disease; randomized trials in C5‑inadequate responders and complement‑naïve patients, head‑to‑head with C5 inhibitors .
- Balance sheet strategy: Plans to restructure remaining 2026 converts, add capital via partnerships, royalty monetization, debt/equity (including $150M ATM) .
- Manufacturing scalability and launch awareness: Sufficient supply for 2–3 years; targeted field team engaging top transplant centers; increased TA‑TMA awareness .
- Long‑term strategy: U.S. self‑commercialization for narsoplimab; ex‑U.S. partnerships for narsoplimab and zaltenibart; confidence in approval paths .
Estimates Context
- Q4 2024 GAAP EPS actual -$0.54 vs S&P Global consensus -$0.71 (3 estimates), a beat of $0.17. Note: SPGI “actual” shows -$0.55 for Primary EPS, while company press release reports -$0.54; difference likely rounding/definition of “Primary EPS” vs GAAP .
- Revenue consensus $0.0*; company reports no revenue from continuing operations, with OMIDRIA royalties accounted within discontinued operations and asset remeasurement mechanics .
- Implication: Near‑term estimate revisions likely to reflect improved EPS trajectory from lower interest expense and stable OpEx; 2025 estimates hinge on regulatory milestones (FDA acceptance, PDUFA) and launch timing .
Values with asterisk (*) retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Narsoplimab’s resubmitted BLA and robust survival data materially de‑risk regulatory outcome; a confirmed FDA acceptance and PDUFA clock start would be a near‑term catalyst .
- Q4 EPS beat reflects lower interest expense and steady OpEx; continue monitoring Q1 2025 interest expense step‑up (~$7.2M guided) and discontinued ops income ($7–$8M) .
- Liquidity declined to $90.1M; management is actively pursuing refinancing of 2026 converts and external capital—expect financing headlines (ATM, partnerships, royalty monetization) .
- Commercial readiness is advanced: supply secured, center relationships established, reimbursement coding in place—supports rapid post‑approval ramp .
- Zaltenibart’s Phase 3 head‑to‑head design versus C5 inhibitors and favorable safety profile position it for differentiated adoption; watch for enrollment progress and 2025 data updates .
- OMIDRIA royalties remain a cash flow contributor; sequential improvement QoQ and HOPD policy tailwinds noted previously should aid 2025 discontinued ops income .
- Risk factors: regulatory interpretation of external controls, balance sheet strain, and timing of capital raises; management’s multi‑pronged financing approach mitigates but does not eliminate execution risk .