OC
OMNIQ Corp. (OMQS)·Q1 2016 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2016 revenue rose 72% year over year to $18.4M, while gross margin improved sequentially to 20.8% from 18.5% in Q4; GAAP net loss widened to $(1.50)M on higher amortization and interest tied to the ViascanQData acquisition .
- Sequential trends: revenue fell from seasonally stronger Q4 ($22.9M) to $18.4M, but gross margin rebounded 230 bps on a higher consumables mix; Adjusted EBITDA turned to $(0.16)M from $0.13M in Q4 as integration and expense levels weighed .
- Management reiterated a 2016 plan “on track” for ~$90M revenue and positive EBITDA; announced balance sheet actions (convert ~$4.3M debt to equity; repurchase up to 4.5M shares for ESPP) and reported $5.6M backlog expected to deliver in Q2—key near‑term catalysts .
- Street consensus (S&P Global) for Q1 2016 EPS and revenue was unavailable during this session; we cannot assess beat/miss vs estimates. S&P Global consensus data was not retrievable due to request limits.
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Strong top-line expansion and sequential margin improvement: revenue +72% YoY to $18.4M; gross margin improved to 20.8% from 18.5% in Q4 on a higher consumables mix .
- Operating cash flow strength: cash from operations of $1.5M vs $0.13M in Q1 2015, aiding liquidity while integration progresses .
- Strategic balance sheet moves and integration progress: Board approved Series C preferred for debt conversion (
$4M+ targeted by June); synergies and cost initiatives identified ($1M in 2016); CEO: “we remain on track to achieve [~$90M revenue and positive EBITDA]” .
What Went Wrong
- GAAP profitability pressure: net loss widened to $(1.50)M vs $(0.42)M YoY driven by amortization of acquired intangibles, higher interest expense, and acquisition-related costs .
- Adjusted EBITDA dipped negative to $(0.16)M vs $0.04M in Q1 2015 and $0.13M in Q4 2015, reflecting integration costs and opex levels early in the year .
- Gross margin down YoY (20.8% vs 22.4%) on account/customer mix, despite the sequential improvement; Q1 is seasonally the lowest revenue quarter, impacting operating leverage .
Financial Results
Quarterly results (sequential trend: Q3 2015 → Q4 2015 → Q1 2016)
YoY context for Q1: Revenue $18.4M vs $10.7M (+72%); Gross margin 20.8% vs 22.4%; Net loss $(1.50)M vs $(0.42)M; Adjusted EBITDA $(0.16)M vs $0.04M .
KPIs and balance sheet indicators
Notes and non‑GAAP reconciliation points
- Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation (Q1): EBITDA $(327,683) plus non‑cash stock comp $149,011 and one‑time costs $18,245 → Adjusted EBITDA $(160,427) .
- Q1 cash disclosure: CFO cited ~$1.7M total cash including ~$0.55M restricted; balance sheet shows $1.14M cash and $0.55M restricted—difference reflects classification/rounding .
Segment/Revenue mix
- Revenue derived from hardware, software, consumables (labels, tags, ribbons) and related services; no discrete segment reporting provided in the release .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We delivered net revenue of $18.4 million, a 72% increase… Q1 is seasonally our lowest revenue quarter… We expect… trend to continue in the upcoming quarters thus supporting our revenue growth.” — CEO Gilles Gaudreault .
- “We began 2016 with a sales plan that supports… ~$90 million in revenue with positive EBITDA for the full year. As of March 31, 2016 we remain on track to achieve these targets.” — CEO .
- “The increase is attributable to the organic growth of 39.5% from the US-based companies and the acquisition of the ViascanQData in October 2015.” — CFO Joey Trombino on Q1 YoY growth drivers .
- “Adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter of 2016 was negative $160,000… We use adjusted EBITDA as a key non‑GAAP earnings measure of the underlying operations.” — CFO .
- “We have agreements to convert $4.3 million of outstanding debts… to equity with our new Series C Preferred Stock.” — CEO .
- “Backlog of signed, contracted orders at March 31, 2016 was $5.6 million… expected to be delivered during Q2‑2016.” — Press release .
Q&A Highlights
- Cost control and opex trajectory: management targeted ~$1M 2016 operating cost reductions post‑merger; reiterated that some acquisition‑related costs will roll off .
- News flow and pipeline catalysts: management flagged upcoming announcements on cloud partnerships (Apex smart lockers; retail shelf analytics; yard management), positioned as demand generators .
- Capital return/ESPP logistics: repurchase shares sourced from prior settlement to fund ESPP; legal constraints limit insider market purchases; program rollout in U.S. and Canada .
- Deleveraging path: combining prior note repurchases and planned $4.3M conversion supports a cumulative ~$9.2M debt reduction trajectory across periods .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street (S&P Global) consensus for Q1 2016 EPS and revenue was unavailable during this session due to data access limits; therefore, we cannot assess beats/misses versus consensus. We recommend revisiting S&P Global for consensus and revising this section accordingly.
- Modeling considerations: sequential gross margin improvement tied to consumables mix (positive), operating cost reductions (~$1M, positive), and lower interest expense if debt conversions execute as planned (positive); YoY margin compression from account mix and ongoing amortization expenses are headwinds to GAAP EPS .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Sequential quality improved despite seasonal revenue downtick: gross margin rose 230 bps QoQ to 20.8% on consumables mix; watch for sustained mix benefits into Q2 .
- Balance sheet de‑risking is a near‑term catalyst: ~$4.3M debt‑to‑equity conversion and ESPP‑funded repurchases can lower interest burden and simplify capital structure .
- Integration and cost synergy execution in focus: ~$1M operating efficiency target in 2016 and 20% executive pay cut support EBITDA recovery in coming quarters .
- Backlog conversion should aid Q2: $5.6M backlog slated for Q2 delivery supports sequential revenue and operating leverage .
- Recurring revenue base expanding: net deferred revenue increased to $1.4M with multi‑year terms, improving visibility and margin profile over time .
- Watch non‑GAAP vs GAAP gap: amortization of acquired intangibles and interest expense continue to pressure GAAP EPS; Adjusted EBITDA is the cleaner operating indicator near term .
- Strategic pipeline: cloud initiatives (smart lockers, shelf analytics, yard management) add higher‑margin SaaS/services optionality—announcements could be incremental stock catalysts .