Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Darrell Birck

Executive Vice President at OPAL Fuels
Executive

About Darrell Birck

Darrell Birck is Executive Vice President at OPAL Fuels, serving since December 2024; he is 62 years old . His background spans senior operations leadership at Koch Industries’ DEPCOM Power (Senior Vice President, Project Operations), Georgia-Pacific Corrugated (Senior Director of Operations), Flint Hills Resources (Vice President, Operations for Biofuels & Ingredients overseeing eight biorefineries), and 19 years at Cytec Solvay Group leading operations at chemical manufacturing facilities . OPAL ties executive incentives to operational and financial performance, including Adjusted EBITDA, RNG output and projects placed into construction under its STIP and PRSU frameworks . OPAL prohibits hedging and pledging of company stock by executive officers, requires pre-clearance, and enforces blackout periods, which moderates opportunistic trading risks .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
DEPCOM Power (Koch Industries)Senior Vice President, Project Operations“Over a decade”Led execution and scaling for a leading solar energy solutions provider
Georgia-Pacific CorrugatedSenior Director of OperationsNot disclosedOversaw operations for a major global manufacturer in packaging/building products
Flint Hills ResourcesVice President, Operations (Biofuels & Ingredients)Not disclosedOversaw eight biorefineries; operational leadership in biofuels
Cytec Solvay GroupOperations leader19 yearsRan operations at chemical manufacturing facilities

External Roles

No public company board or external roles disclosed for Mr. Birck in OPAL’s proxy .

Fixed Compensation

  • Base salary, target bonus, and actual bonus for Mr. Birck are not disclosed in the 2025 proxy (NEO disclosure covers Co-CEOs, General Counsel, EVP Dave Unger) .
  • OPAL reviews executive base salaries annually based on role scope, market benchmarks, and performance; executives participate in standard employee benefits and the 401(k) plan on the same basis as other employees .

Performance Compensation

Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP) – Design and Metrics

Performance Measure% of PayoutPayout OpportunityRange of Weighting
Adjusted EBITDA ($ millions)40%0–200%Part of Corporate Metrics 70–80%
RNG Production (MMBtus)20%0–200%Part of Corporate Metrics 70–80%
RNG Design Capacity Placed in Construction (MMBtus)30%0–200%Part of Corporate Metrics 70–80%
New Transportation Fuel Contracts (GGEs)10%0–200%Part of Corporate Metrics 70–80%
Strategic/Personal Objectives20–30%
Safety Modifier±10%Company-wide safety modifier

Notes:

  • Committee maintains discretion to adjust for extraordinary items (e.g., RIN pricing, ITC timing) .
  • Upon change in control, a terminated participant (other than for cause) is entitled to a prorated bonus per plan terms .

Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) – PRSU Performance Grid (2024 grant cycle)

MetricWeightingThresholdTargetMaximum
Adjusted EBITDA + ITC Proceeds ($ millions)50%$408.8 → 50%$545.0 → 100%$681.3 → 200%
RNG Projects Placed into Construction (MMBtus)50%4.5 → 50%6.0 → 100%7.5 → 200%

Vesting and Acceleration Terms:

  • 2024 RSUs and options vest in three equal annual tranches on March 31 of 2025/2026/2027; PRSUs for the 2024 cycle vest on March 31, 2027 after the 2024–2026 performance period .
  • RSUs/options accelerate to next tranche upon disability or termination without cause; full acceleration upon death; full acceleration for RSUs/options upon termination without cause or resignation for good reason within 24 months of a change in control (double-trigger) .
  • For PRSUs, Termination Event (no CIC) entitles pro rata vesting at target; CIC termination vests the greater of target or performance-to-date; death vests at target; post-period termination vests based on actual performance .

Option Grant Policy and Timing:

  • Company last granted stock options on April 8, 2025; it does not grant options to Section 16 insiders close to material nonpublic information releases and enforces timing restrictions around filings; these restrictions do not apply to RSUs .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

  • Anti-hedging/anti-pledging policy applies to directors and executive officers; margin/pledging transactions are prohibited except if expressly permitted by the General Counsel; all trades require pre-clearance and adhere to blackout/window rules .
  • Individual beneficial ownership for Mr. Birck is not separately disclosed; all directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons) held 2,111,462 Class A shares (7.3% of Class A) as of the record date .
  • Controlled company: voting control resides with OPAL Holdco (Fortistar) led by Chairman Mark Comora; as a result, OPAL may rely on Nasdaq “controlled company” governance exemptions .

Employment Terms

  • Executive officers are elected annually and serve at the discretion of the Board; no family relationships disclosed for Mr. Birck; no legal proceedings involving executive officers in the last 10 years .
  • The proxy states no NEOs have employment agreements; change-in-control economics primarily arise through equity award acceleration and STIP prorating; OPAL documents do not disclose severance multiples or tax gross-ups for executives .
  • Outstanding award schedules (RSUs/options/PRSUs) and double-trigger CIC acceleration set the cadence for potential future share availability/settlement; award cycles and vest dates cluster around March 31 based on recent grant practices .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment and selling pressure: OPAL’s anti-hedging/anti-pledging and pre-clearance/blackout regime curbs short-term trading incentives, while three-year vesting on RSUs/options and three-year PRSU performance periods create scheduled equity settlement windows that can coincide with March 31 in 2025–2027 for recent grants, moderating but not eliminating supply overhang risk around vest dates .
  • Pay-for-performance: The heavy weighting to Adjusted EBITDA (including ITC monetization) and RNG project execution ties upside to operational throughput and project milestones; PRSU grids with 200% maximums emphasize scale-up execution, but also embed exposure to RIN pricing and ITC timing that the Committee may adjust for in STIP .
  • Retention risk: Absence of disclosed employment agreements and the controlled company governance structure place retention economics primarily in equity awards and prorated STIP upon CIC termination, rather than fixed severance; acceleration mechanics (double-trigger for RSUs/options; target-or-better PRSU vesting on CIC termination) provide meaningful protection that could reduce departure friction during strategic events .
  • Governance and oversight: Compensation Committee uses Korn Ferry and defines market-based LTIP structures; audit/comp committees include independent directors, though OPAL may rely on controlled company exemptions—important context for benchmarking and shareholder say-on-pay interpretations .