RH
Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 was mixed: revenue rose 6.9% YoY to $91.2M on 12% consumables volume growth (constant-currency +8.8%), but margins compressed and GAAP loss widened; Adjusted EBITDA fell 9.9% to $17.3M as Europe/APAC softness, input cost inflation, and mix weighed on profitability .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, revenue modestly beat by ~0.7% (Actual $91.2M vs $90.56M*), while Primary EPS missed (Actual -$0.08* vs -$0.04*); S&P EBITDA missed as well (Actual $8.0M* vs $18.1M*) as company AEBITDA ($17.3M) includes adjustments not in S&P “EBITDA” . Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- North America was the growth engine (sales +33%, volumes +40% YoY) on enterprise-driven plastic-to-paper transition; Europe/APAC turned weak in March but stabilized slightly in April; several automation projects shifted from Q1 to Q2, with full-year automation still targeted at ~50% growth .
- No explicit update to 2025 guidance this quarter; management remains focused on pricing, cost actions (~$8M structural reductions), and mix to restore margins, while Amazon warrant accounting will create non-cash revenue/AEBITDA headwinds ($3–$5M FY’25) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Enterprise-led growth in North America: “North America posted another excellent net revenue quarter, driven by 45% PPS volume growth… net revenue growth of 33.5%” .
- Momentum intact in automation despite timing: “Automation sales were slightly up… some projects got pushed from Q1 to Q2… momentum… extremely strong” .
- Strategic alignment with Amazon (warrant deal) viewed as growth catalyst: “great alignment for meaningful incremental growth and cash flow” .
-
What Went Wrong
- Europe/APAC softness in March drove margin pressure: “lower volumes in Europe and APAC… higher input costs” reduced AEBITDA; mix and inefficiencies also weighed .
- Input cost inflation and supply tightness in North American kraft paper created short-term logistics/efficiency issues; inventory was built to protect service levels .
- Non-cash Amazon warrant impact reduced reported revenue by ~$0.8M (0.9% headwind) and contributed ~420 bps to reported AEBITDA headwind in Q1 .
Financial Results
Headline results: Q3 2024 → Q4 2024 → Q1 2025
Versus estimates (S&P Global):
Values retrieved from S&P Global. Note: Company-reported AEBITDA ($17.3M) includes adjustments not reflected in S&P “EBITDA” .
Product mix (Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024):
KPIs:
Balance sheet and cash flow highlights (Q1 2025):
- Cash: $65.5M; undrawn $50M revolver; $409.0M term loan outstanding; net cash from ops $(1.3)M (inventory build to protect service) .
Guidance Changes
No explicit update in Q1; management discussed pricing/cost actions and automation timing but did not change FY 2025 guidance. The most recent formal guide (3/6/2025) remains:
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategic focus and alignment: “We believe [Amazon warrant] provides great alignment for meaningful incremental growth and cash flow for Ranpak… a testament to the strong innovation and execution we have delivered.”
- Regional dynamics: “North America… the key driver… sales up 33% and volumes up more than 40%… Europe/APAC… weaker-than-expected March… April saw stabilization” .
- Margin plan: “We have taken price in the second quarter… and we have identified structural cost reductions of $8 million” .
- Tariffs: “Impact… largely related to capital expenditures of our PPS converters… stepping up… refabricate and refurbish existing machines… [Automation] value proposition… remains extremely compelling even with the current tariff” .
Q&A Highlights
- Europe/APAC softness and outlook: Europe weaker in March (Nordics/Germany soft), April stabilization; Japan strong; overall constructive on APAC, cautious on Europe .
- Automation timing and demand: Slips from Q1 to Q2 reflect deal timing, not demand; large enterprise ROI keeps projects moving despite tariffs; still targeting >50% growth in 2025 .
- Margin trajectory: Expect gross margin to improve Q1→Q2 with bigger step-up in H2 as pricing and cost actions take hold .
- Cost actions detail: Structural cost reductions focused on headcount, freight/logistics, outside storage, and discretionary spend; operational planning improvements after NA paper tightness .
- Amazon warrant optics: Non-cash revenue reduction flows through gross profit/AEBITDA/NI, added back in cash flow; Q1 impact ~$0.8M (0.9% of sales) .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 comparison to S&P Global consensus: revenue beat by ~0.7% (Actual $91.2M vs $90.56M*), Primary EPS missed by $0.04 (Actual -$0.08* vs -$0.04*), and S&P EBITDA missed (Actual $8.0M* vs $18.05M*) . Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Note on definitions: Company reports EBITDA ($9.7M) and AEBITDA ($17.3M), while S&P “EBITDA” excludes company adjustments; use caution comparing company AEBITDA to S&P EBITDA .
- Estimate depth: Revenue estimates (n=3), EPS estimates (n=1) indicate limited analyst coverage; estimate dispersion likely low* Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- North America enterprise momentum is intact and should continue to drive consumables volumes; automation growth (~50% targeted) remains a key 2H lever despite Q1 timing slips .
- Margin repair is the central narrative for H2’25: pricing actions, $8M structural cost reductions, and operational fixes should sequentially lift gross margin from Q1 trough levels .
- Reported figures will include non-cash Amazon warrant offsets ($3–$5M FY’25), obscuring underlying cash economics; evaluate “as-adjusted” performance excluding the warrant impact .
- Mix shift (void-fill strength, cushioning decline) favors e-commerce exposure; watch for stabilization in Europe/APAC as an upside optionality to the margin story .
- Liquidity is solid ($65.5M cash, undrawn revolver) with deleveraging supported by cash generation focus; cross-currency swaps help interest expense and FX risk .
- Tariff exposure is mainly capex/converters; mitigation via alternative sourcing/refurbishment should limit structural COGS impact; not expected to impair automation ROI .
- Near-term trading: modest top-line beat overshadowed by EPS/EBITDA misses vs S&P; stock likely keyed to evidence of margin inflection and automation bookings conversion in Q2–Q3.
Values retrieved from S&P Global: Revenue Consensus Mean, Primary EPS Consensus Mean, EBITDA Consensus Mean, and number of estimates.