Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Joseph Marino

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at PBF EnergyPBF Energy
Executive

About Joseph Marino

Joseph Marino is PBF Energy’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective October 1, 2025; he joined PBF in 2011, served as Treasurer since 2020, and previously Assistant Controller (2015–2020). Prior to PBF, Marino worked at Ernst & Young LLP with large public and private companies across energy and industrial sectors; he is 46 years old as disclosed in the appointment filing . Company performance context during his pre-CFO tenure: 2024 Pay‑versus‑Performance disclosures show PBF’s TSR value of $90.10 vs the peer group’s $168.71, with 2024 net income of $(540.2) million and EBITDA of $(68.8) million, reflecting a challenging macro and operational backdrop .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
PBF EnergyTreasurer2020–2025Led treasury within finance; progression through increasing responsibility
PBF EnergyAssistant Controller2015–2020Senior finance/accounting role supporting reporting and controls
PBF EnergyVarious finance & accounting roles2011–2015Progression across finance since joining in 2011
PBF EnergyChief Financial Officer2025–presentAppointed CFO effective Oct 1, 2025

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsNotes
Ernst & Young LLPAudit/Advisory (oil & gas, industrials, consumer, health sciences)Pre‑2011 (prior to joining PBF)Served clients across sectors before joining PBF

Fixed Compensation

ElementDetailAmount / Term
Base SalaryAnnual base salary per employment agreement$500,000 (effective Oct 1, 2025)
Target Annual BonusDefined as 1.0x Base Salary in agreement; eligible under company cash incentive plan on same basis as senior executivesTarget = 100% of base salary; payout per plan discretion
BenefitsHealth, welfare benefits participation; expense reimbursement; first-class travel for business; D&O indemnification and insuranceAs per agreement; D&O coverage through employment term and 6 years thereafter

Performance Compensation

Award TypeMetricWeighting (by grant value)Target / MechanicsVesting
Restricted StockTime-based~40% of LTI (2025 grant value $994,961) [2025 plan]Fixed grant value converted to shares; dividends accrue but pay upon vestRatable over 3 years from grant date
Performance Share Units (PSUs)Relative TSR vs peer group (CVR Energy, Delek US, HF Sinclair, Marathon, Phillips 66, Valero)~30% of LTI (2025 grant value $746,221)0–200% payout based on TSR rank and TSR vs peer average; negative TSR cap at 100%Cliff vest at end of 3-year cycle (2026–2028), 12/31/2028; equity-settled
Performance Units (Cash)Relative TSR vs peer group~30% of LTI (2025 grant value $746,221)Dollar-denominated units (target $1.00); 0–200% payout; negative TSR cap appliesCliff vest 12/31/2028; cash-settled

Detailed grant values approved October 21, 2025 (granted October 28, 2025):

  • Restricted Stock: $994,961; PSUs: $746,221; Performance Units: $746,221 for the 2026–2028 performance period .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

ItemDetailAmount / Notes
Beneficial Ownership (post-grant)Directly owned shares after grant and tax withholding50,000 shares (including 30,353 restricted shares granted 10/28/2025)
Recent Insider TransactionsAcquisition (restricted stock) and tax withholding dispositionAcquired 30,353 restricted shares at $0 (grant); disposed 395 shares at $33.44 (Code F—tax) on 10/27–10/28/2025
Stock Ownership GuidelinesCompany maintains meaningful executive ownership guidelinesGuidelines disclosed; NEOs meet requirements historically
Hedging/PledgingCompany policy prohibits hedging, pledging, short salesGovernance policy; no pledges indicated in Marino’s Form 4

Employment Terms

ProvisionKey TermsEconomics / Duration
TermInitial term Oct 1, 2025–Sep 30, 2026; auto 1‑year renewals unless 30‑day non‑renewal noticeRolling annual renewals
Non‑Compete / Non‑SolicitNon‑compete and non‑solicit of senior execs6 months post‑termination; narrowed to PBF’s refining geographies; null on Change in Control
Severance (no CIC)If terminated without Cause/by Executive for Good Reason or company non‑renewal1.5x Base Salary cash; 18 months health benefits continuation; Accrued Rights; release required
Severance (CIC window)6 months prior to or within 1 year post‑CIC, if terminated without Cause/by Good Reason or company non‑renewal2.99x Base Salary cash; immediate vesting/exercisability of equity/warrants; 2 years 11 months health benefits; 280G cut‑back to avoid Excise Tax
Death/DisabilityPro‑rata target bonus; 0.5x Base Salary cash; Accrued RightsAs specified; physician determination for disability
Good Reason / CauseDefined in agreementGood Reason includes non‑payment, sustained diminution of responsibilities, material breach; Cause includes willful failure, misconduct, certain breaches
Dispute ResolutionArbitration in New York; specific performance for covenant breachesNew York law; AAA employment rules
ClawbackCompany-wide clawback policy (accounting restatement) and award-level forfeiture provisionsAdopted Oct 2, 2023; applies to erroneously awarded compensation; restrictive covenants tied to forfeiture

Investment Implications

  • Alignment and upside skew: Marino’s 2025 LTI mix (40% restricted, 60% performance awards tied to relative TSR with a negative TSR cap) aligns his pay with shareholder returns and multi‑year value creation, while time‑vesting stock strengthens retention through 2028 .
  • Limited near‑term selling pressure: Post‑appointment Form 4 shows only 395 shares withheld for taxes and a 30,353‑share restricted grant—no open‑market disposals—reducing near‑term insider selling risk signals .
  • Retention and change‑in‑control economics: Standard non‑compete (6 months) and severance (1.5x base) mitigate voluntary exit risk; CIC terms (2.99x base, accelerated vesting) are competitive but include 280G cut‑back, limiting gross‑up risk and excessive parachute concerns .
  • Governance and policy safeguards: Prohibitions on hedging/pledging and a broad clawback policy lower alignment red flags; strong prior Say‑on‑Pay support (97.3%) suggests investor acceptance of pay design used for senior executives .