Sign in
PT

PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 delivered a clean top-line and EPS beat with revenue of $338.9M vs S&P Global consensus $328.1M and non-GAAP diluted EPS of $0.42 vs $0.32; non-GAAP operating margin expanded to 17% from 13% in Q2, aided by mix and some one-time G&A benefits . Revenue Consensus: $328.1M*, EPS Consensus: $0.323*, EBITDA Consensus: $67.3M*.
  • FY 2025 guidance was raised: revenue to $1.312B–$1.314B and non-GAAP operating margin to 14% (prior $1.299B–$1.302B and 13%–13.5%), signaling improved confidence in growth durability and margin trajectory .
  • Q4 guide implies 12%–13% y/y growth with non-GAAP operating margin ~14.4%; management highlighted net new ARR growth outpacing revenue, large-deal strength, and longer contract durations supporting CRPO .
  • Strategic updates and catalysts: announced a new $300M buyback (after ~$129M YTD repurchases), CEO transition to Ajei Gopal (Ansys pedigree), and AI product momentum (Assist, Agent Builder, AWS collaboration), all likely to underpin sentiment and multiple stability .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Broad-based execution: net new ARR grew “notably faster” than revenue, strong owner and specialty contractor motions, and improved cross-sell; large six- and seven-figure deals accelerated 31% y/y .
  • Margin expansion: non-GAAP operating margin reached 17% in Q3 (from 13% in Q2; 10% in Q1), with continued leverage and one-time G&A tailwinds; free cash flow of $67.7M, +194% y/y .
  • AI and platform leadership: at Groundbreak, Procore rolled out agentic AI roadmap (Assist, Agent Builder), cited unmatched proprietary construction data; AWS collaboration and FedRAMP “Moderate Equivalency” designation broaden market reach .

Management quote: “We have built an unrivaled platform... well-positioned to harness the power of AI for our customers, and our go-to-market model is yielding positive returns.” — CEO Tooey Courtemanche .

What Went Wrong

  • Macro remains a headwind: combined U.S. non-residential and multifamily sectors posted -2% growth; management cautioned lead-times before a turn shows up in revenue .
  • FX pressure internationally: Q3 international revenue grew 14% y/y, but FX was a ~1pt headwind; constant currency +15% .
  • EBITDA optics vs Street: S&P Global’s EBITDA actual appears well below consensus, reflecting methodology differences vs company’s preferred non-GAAP operating margin framework; this could create confusion in models*. Actual EBITDA: $15.2M*, vs consensus $67.3M*.

Financial Results

Quarterly progression vs prior quarters

MetricQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Revenue ($USD)$310,632,000 $323,919,000 $338,851,000
Non-GAAP Diluted EPS ($)$0.23 $0.35 $0.42
GAAP Gross Margin (%)79% 79% 80%
Non-GAAP Gross Margin (%)83% 83% 84%
GAAP Operating Margin (%)-12% -9% -4%
Non-GAAP Operating Margin (%)10% 13% 17%

Year-over-year comparison

MetricQ3 2024Q3 2025
Revenue ($USD)$295,885,000 $338,851,000
Non-GAAP Diluted EPS ($)$0.24 $0.42
Note15% y/y revenue growth

Q3 vs S&P Global consensus (beats)

MetricConsensusActual
Revenue ($USD)$328,132,530*$338,851,000
Primary EPS ($)$0.323*$0.42
EBITDA ($USD)$67,318,460*$15,238,000*

Values with asterisk retrieved from S&P Global.

KPIs and backlog progression

KPIQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Gross Revenue Retention (%)95% 95% 95%
$100k+ ARR Customers (#)2,418 2,517 2,602
Net New Organic Customers (quarter)218 195 122
Total Organic Customers (#)17,306 17,501 17,623
Current RPO ($000s)$842,558 $879,489 $911,220
Non-current RPO ($000s)$447,707 $464,268 $498,314
Total RPO ($000s)$1,290,265 $1,343,757 $1,409,534

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Revenue ($USD)Q3 2025$326M–$328M Actual: $338.9M Beat vs guide
Non-GAAP Operating Margin (%)Q3 202513%–13.5% Actual: 17% Beat vs guide
Revenue ($USD)Q4 2025$339M–$341M New guide
Non-GAAP Operating Margin (%)Q4 202514.4% New guide
Revenue ($USD)FY 2025$1,299M–$1,302M $1,312M–$1,314M Raised
Non-GAAP Operating Margin (%)FY 202513%–13.5% 14% Raised

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1 & Q2)Current Period (Q3)Trend
AI/Technology InitiativesInnovation Summit; BIM acquisitions (Novorender, Flypaper); Assist rollout Groundbreak AI roadmap (Assist, Agent Builder); AWS collaboration; customer excitement Accelerating product velocity and adoption
Go-to-Market ExecutionTransition and efficiency focus Higher pipeline conversion, improving expansion, lower sales attrition Sustained improvement
Macro/TariffsCFO prepared to manage evolving tariff landscape Macro unchanged; -2% non-res + multifamily growth; revenue lags macro turns Stable headwind
Backlog/CRPORPO up across Q1/Q2 CRPO aided by longer durations; normalized CRPO consistent with revenue/ARR Positive with duration mix
Pricing/PackagingTesting stakeholder-tailored bundles (good/better/best) simplifying adoption Pilot progressing well
Federal/RegulatoryFedRAMP “In Process” FedRAMP “Moderate Equivalency” designation Strengthening federal credibility

Management Commentary

  • “Q3 represented another strong quarter, marked by consistent revenue growth and improved operating leverage.” — CFO (press release) .
  • “Procore reached… surpassing $1 trillion in annual construction volume contracted to our platform” — CEO Tooey Courtemanche (prepared remarks) .
  • “Net new ARR growth… notably faster than revenue growth… Non-GAAP operating margin increased 380 bps q/q” — SVP Finance Matt Puljiz .
  • “We announced new AI innovations including expanded features for Procore Assist and Open Beta release for Procore Agent Builder” — press release .
  • “Board authorized a new $300M stock repurchase program… expires Nov 3, 2026” — 8-K .

Q&A Highlights

  • ARR momentum and future growth: Net new ARR outpaced revenue; base case growth intact; optimism for Q4 delivery .
  • Backlog/renewals and CRPO: Healthy renewals; longer average contract duration boosts reported CRPO; normalized growth aligns with revenue/ARR .
  • NRR framework: Churn stable; expansion improving; pooled contracts carry 100% NRR headwind to reported NRR metric .
  • Pricing & packaging pilot: Stakeholder-focused bundles simplify adoption; not expected to materially change near-term financial trajectory .
  • Data centers and competitive landscape: Exposure is strong but small part of construction; feedback at Groundbreak centered on Procore innovation more than competitors .

Estimates Context

  • Q3 beats vs S&P Global: Revenue $338.9M vs $328.1M*, Primary EPS $0.42 vs $0.323*, both clear beats; EBITDA actual $15.2M* vs $67.3M* reflects methodology differences vs company’s preferred non-GAAP operating metrics .
  • Q4 setup: Consensus revenue $340.8M* aligns with guide $339M–$341M; consensus EPS $0.356* vs implied non-GAAP OM of ~14.4% suggests modest operating leverage continuity .
  • Street context: Target price consensus ~$86.44* (18 estimates*). Values retrieved from S&P Global.

Values with asterisk retrieved from S&P Global.

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Strong execution with tangible beats and rising FY guide; margin expansion is compounding and supported by go-to-market improvements and scale .
  • Backlog quality improving with longer terms and healthy renewals; expect CRPO normalization to align with revenue/ARR into Q4 as duration anniversaries .
  • AI roadmap and AWS collaboration deepen platform moat; early customer enthusiasm can drive cross-sell and stickiness, supporting mix and margins .
  • Capital allocation turning more shareholder-friendly: ~$129M repurchased YTD and new $300M program; dilution contained (~1% y/y) .
  • Near-term trading lens: clear beat/raise quarter, CEO transition to a proven operator, and buyback authorization are positive catalysts; watch Q4 conversion and any macro inflection signals .
  • Medium-term thesis: durable growth premium to end-market, expanding non-GAAP margins (FY 2025 to 14%) with free cash flow per-share focus; monitor FX and macro, and potential EBITDA definition variances in consensus models .
  • Risk checks: construction cycle timing uncertainty, FX headwinds, and pooled-contract impacts on reported NRR; methodology differences for EBITDA could drive modeling dispersion* .
Notes:
- Values with asterisk retrieved from S&P Global.