Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
- Strong leasing pipeline and high confidence in achieving 2025 leasing targets: Paramount Group has already executed a significant 131,000 square foot lease at 900 Third Avenue in the first quarter of 2025, and has approximately 500,000 square feet of leases under contract or in advanced negotiations. This positions them well to achieve their 2025 leasing goal of 900,000 square feet at the midpoint.
- Improving market conditions in New York and San Francisco: The company is experiencing increased leasing activity and market dynamics are improving. In New York, there is high demand for quality assets, allowing Paramount to have pricing power and potentially achieve higher rents. In San Francisco, there is increased interest from early-stage tech and AI companies, along with a rise in tour activity, which could lead to more leasing opportunities.
- Potential for higher rental rates and better deal terms: Scarcity of high-quality spaces, especially on higher floors in Midtown Manhattan, is giving Paramount pricing power. The company expects to achieve better net effective rents and has already seen higher rents in recent leasing discussions.
- Significant lease expirations from major tenants such as Google and JPMorgan in 2025 ( ), and Showtime, Visa, and KPMG in 2026 ( ), with uncertainty around backfilling these large spaces, could negatively impact occupancy and revenue.
- Leasing capital expenditures as a percentage of initial rent reached the highest level on record in the fourth quarter ( ), indicating potentially higher costs to secure tenants, which may reduce returns.
- The company's ambitious 2025 leasing target of 900,000 square feet ( ), higher than the 763,000 square feet achieved in 2024, may be difficult to achieve given current market conditions and dependence on speculative leasing ( ), raising concerns about their ability to meet expectations.
| Metric | Period | Previous Guidance | Current Guidance | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Core FFO Guidance | FY 2024 | no prior guidance | Raised by $0.01 at the midpoint to a new range of $0.78 to $0.80 per share | no prior guidance |
Same-Store NOI Growth Outlook | FY 2024 | no prior guidance | Improved by 100 basis points (cash) and 50 basis points (GAAP) | no prior guidance |
Leasing Guidance | FY 2024 | no prior guidance | Increased to a new range of 825,000 square feet to 925,000 square feet | no prior guidance |
Same-Store Leased Occupancy | FY 2024 | no prior guidance | Reduced by 50 basis points at the midpoint | no prior guidance |
Core FFO per Share | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Range of $0.51 to $0.57 per share; Midpoint at $0.54 per share | no prior guidance |
Leasing Guidance | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Target range of 800,000 to 1 million square feet | no prior guidance |
Same-Store Growth (Cash Basis) | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Expected to range between negative 11% and negative 7% | no prior guidance |
Same-Store Growth (GAAP Basis) | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Expected to range between negative 13% and negative 9% | no prior guidance |
Year-End Same-Store Leased Occupancy Rate | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Guidance range of 83.9% to 85.9% | no prior guidance |
| Topic | Previous Mentions | Current Period | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
Leasing Pipeline | Discussed across Q1–Q3 with robust pipelines, strong negotiation volumes, and healthy lease executions ( , in Q1; , in Q2; , , , in Q3). | Q4 showed solid pipeline execution with record-high leasing activity in key markets – notably in Midtown New York with around 109,000 sf leased and strong advanced negotiations ( , , ). | Consistently strong pipeline performance with an emphasis on high-quality assets; optimism remains high in New York while San Francisco continues to improve. |
Occupancy Targets | Cited in every period with discussions on same‐store occupancy rates around 84–87%, despite minor declines (Q1: 87.1% target, Q2: 86.3%, Q3: 84.7% in portfolio, with concerns over expirations) ( , , ). | Q4 reported similar occupancy levels (84.8% portfolio-wide in Q4) with flat guidance for 2025 due to significant lease expirations ( , ). | Recurring emphasis on flat occupancy performance as lease expirations weigh on targets, with little improvement despite strong leasing pipeline. |
Major Tenant Lease Expirations and Renewal Uncertainty | Addressed in Q1–Q3 with major move-outs (e.g. Clifford Chance, Leerink, JPMorgan, Google) and uncertainties around renewals ( , , ). | Q4 reiterated significant expiration concerns (notably 29% in SF and 6% in NY for 2025, plus renewal uncertainty) while expressing cautious optimism in backfilling vacant space ( , , ). | Persistent challenge; discussions are consistent, with ongoing risk management efforts and a cautious tone regarding renewal outcomes. |
Regional Market Dynamics | Across Q1–Q3, New York consistently showed strong demand and robust leasing especially in Midtown, while San Francisco faced challenges but showed early signs of recovery driven by tech/AI ( , , ). | Q4 reinforced strong New York performance with record leasing activity and highlighted improving SF dynamics with increased AI-driven leasing and venture capital influence ( , ). | Stable divergence between markets: New York remains a powerhouse while SF’s recovery is gradually gaining momentum thanks to innovative tech factors. |
AI and Tech Tenant Demand Impact on Leasing and Credit Risk | Q1–Q3 observed rising AI involvement, with early stage companies emerging; credit risk concerns were noted and mitigated through strict reviews ( , , , ). | Q4 emphasized the significant impact of AI tenants – 86 leases totaling over 1 million sf in SF – coupled with strong funding that reduces immediate credit risk ( , , ). | Evolving positive contribution from AI/tech demand; earlier caution on credit risk is now balanced by strong venture capital backing. |
Rental Rates and Pricing Power Dynamics | Q1 highlighted pricing power in upper floors and rising retail rents; Q2 indicated upward pressure in Midtown and a “flight to quality”; Q3 noted higher negotiated rents in NY but some negative mark-to-market adjustments in SF ( , , , ). | Q4 reported improving pricing power with higher rents on upper floors and stabilized concessions, reflecting strong market dynamics in premium locations ( , ). | Consistent upward trend in rental rates for quality assets, with improved pricing dynamics particularly in New York despite some regional variability. |
NOI Guidance and Operating Efficiency | Q1 saw a modest uptick in NOI guidance, Q2 improved same‐store NOI forecasts and operating expense cuts, and Q3 further lifted guidance with strong liquidity measures ( , , ). | Q4 signaled challenges with negative same‐store NOI growth projections for 2025 but maintained operational efficiency through controlled expenses and noncash adjustments ( , ). | Mixed sentiment: While operating efficiency remains a focus, NOI guidance is pressured by upcoming lease expirations despite maintained cost controls. |
Increased Leasing Capital Expenditures | Not explicitly discussed in Q1–Q3; Q1 mentioned concessions and TIs at historical levels without highlighting capex increases ( ). | Q4 specifically identified increased leasing CapEx driven by a turnkey deal for a lower-floor tenant, noted as an isolated case and not a broader trend ( ). | Isolated occurrence in Q4; not a recurring theme, indicating that higher CapEx was deal-specific rather than a market-wide shift. |
Acquisition Strategy, Liquidity, and Investor Relationships | Consistently described across Q1–Q3 with an asset‐light approach, strong liquidity (often over $1.1B), and active pursuit of joint ventures and selective acquisitions ( in Q1; , in Q2; , in Q3). | Q4 reaffirms an asset-light strategy with active pursuit of opportunities, maintaining strong liquidity and flexibility through partnerships and selective asset sales ( , ). | Steady and disciplined approach: The company continues to leverage robust liquidity and strong investor relationships while partnering for growth. |
Speculative Leasing and Ambitious Leasing Targets Risks | Q1 discussed ambitious leasing targets with a robust pipeline; Q2 elaborated on meeting targets with strong negotiation volumes; Q3 focused on pipeline strength without explicitly labeling risks ( , , ). | Q4 addressed speculative leasing concerns explicitly by quantifying the gap to meet 2025 targets but remained confident due to advanced deals and historical performance ( , , ). | Ongoing concern mitigated by strong pipeline visibility – ambitious targets are recognized as stretch goals, yet confidence persists across periods. |
Asset Impairment and Loan Maturity Risks | Q1 detailed noncore asset impairments and strategies for extending debt maturities; Q2 mentioned loan maturity extensions for assets like 111 Sutter; Q3 provided debt details without highlighting new impairments ( , , ). | Q4 reported a significant noncash impairment in a joint venture and discussed proactive management of loan maturities to remove risk from the balance sheet ( , , ). | Risk management remains central: Consistent focus on restructuring debt and addressing impairments across periods, with Q4 introducing additional impairment adjustments. |
Challenging Investment Environment and Debt Financing Difficulties | Q1 noted a muted transaction market with potential distressed opportunities; Q2 discussed capital market dislocations and cautious asset-light investments; Q3 referenced difficulty in obtaining debt financing in SF ( , , ). | Q4 did not explicitly emphasize these challenges while reiterating a disciplined capital allocation approach and liquidity strategy, suggesting some easing of market tensions ( , ). | Reduced emphasis in Q4: While earlier periods detailed significant challenges, Q4 reflects a more stabilized view with a continued focus on liquidity and strategic partnerships. |
-
Backfilling Google and JPMorgan Move-Outs
Q: What are the plans to backfill Google and JPMorgan spaces?
A: We have several leases out between One Front and One Market buildings in San Francisco. Tour activity is picking up, and we're enhancing amenities important to tenants. We're feeling better about demand compared to last year, with several prospects in the pipeline. -
Confidence in 2025 Leasing Targets
Q: How confident are you in reaching the 2025 leasing target of 900,000 sq ft?
A: We're confident due to market movement towards our asset locations on Sixth Avenue and the West Side. We've already executed a 131,000 sq ft lease in Q1 and have approximately 350,000 sq ft of leases out, with additional proposals. We expect to achieve our guidance. -
San Francisco Market Outlook
Q: What's your outlook on the San Francisco market and leasing activity?
A: The San Francisco market is improving with increased tour activity and inquiries, especially from early-stage companies and AI firms making up roughly 30% of tenant profiles. Return to office is happening, and larger tech companies are starting to reengage. We're well-positioned in key submarkets and are optimistic about 2025. -
2026 Expirations and Move-Outs
Q: Can you provide color on major expirations in 2026?
A: In New York, Showtime is the largest likely move-out in 2026, representing 57% of that year's expirations at 1633 Broadway. We have several tenants interested in that space. In San Francisco, Visa and KPMG are known move-outs, while Morgan Lewis and Autodesk are too soon to comment on. -
Non-Core Asset Dispositions
Q: What's the progress on 111 Sutter Street and Market Center?
A: For 111 Sutter Street, we have an extension until December 2025 and will resume lender discussions. There's no risk to our balance sheet as we're not funding debt shortfalls. Market Center is being sold; the deal has been awarded, and we expect resolution as early as Q2, after which the asset and debt will come off our books, and we'll recognize a tax loss. -
Debt Maturities and Refinancing Plans
Q: What are your plans for the 2026 debt maturities?
A: The market is improving, especially in New York. CMBS issuance in 2024 was 2.5 times that of 2023. We'll address the maturities as we move into the second half of the year and into 2026. -
Leasing CapEx and Concessions
Q: Why was leasing CapEx as a percentage of initial rent high in Q4, and what's the trend in concessions?
A: The increase was due to a turnkey deal where we built out space for a tenant, elevating CapEx relative to rent. This isn't a trend. We expect to have pricing power ahead, especially on higher floors, as 80% of Midtown availability is on floors 24 and below. Concessions are elevated but stable; free rent may stay high near term, but tenant improvement allowances could decrease as the market tightens. -
Strategic Actions and Joint Ventures
Q: Are you considering additional joint ventures or asset sales?
A: Yes, if we find the right value and partner with decent pricing, as we did with 1633 Broadway early in the pandemic. Proceeds could provide flexibility for growth opportunities, share buybacks, or potentially dividends.
Research analysts covering Paramount Group.