Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

PE

Phoenix Energy One, LLC (PHXE-P)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q1 2025 delivered a step‑change as PhoenixOp’s operated production drove consolidated revenue to $115.7M and EBITDA to $72.0M, with net income of $5.6M as product sales comprised ~73% of revenue .
  • Consolidated volumes surged: total production rose 134% y/y to 1.76MMboe and average daily production reached 19,548 boe/d (+137% y/y), supported by 37 producing wells in service at quarter‑end .
  • Balance sheet leverage remains the key watchpoint: total debt was ~$1.084B, negative working capital was ~$157.3M, and management plans to raise ~$400M additional capital in 2025 to fund capex of $750–$850M for 75–85 gross operated wells over the next 12 months .
  • No Wall Street consensus estimates were available via S&P Global for PHXE‑P; consequently, no beat/miss assessment can be made. Estimates data unavailable from S&P Global due to missing CIQ mapping.
  • Near‑term catalysts: continued ramp of operated wells, hedge profile (~4.6MMbbl hedged at ~$63.57/bbl) and covenant compliance could support credit perception; conversely, sustained commodity price weakness and higher interest costs (Fortress SOFR+7.10%) are risks to liquidity and equity‑like securities appetite .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Rapid operating scale-up: Operating segment revenue jumped to $85.8M from $6.7M (+1,184% y/y) as PhoenixOp placed 37 producing wells into service by March 31, 2025 .
  • Strong EBITDA: EBITDA reached $72.0M (vs. $21.9M y/y), reflecting higher consolidated revenues and favorable derivative gains amid commodity price curve changes .
  • Management strategic focus: “Product sales accounted for over 72% of our total revenues… and we expect to derive a greater portion of our total revenues from product sales of crude oil, natural gas, and NGL to PhoenixOp’s customers in the future” .

What Went Wrong

  • Interest burden doubled: Net interest expense rose to $35.8M (from $16.9M y/y) on higher unsecured bonds and Fortress borrowings; depletion also increased to $31.2M (+133% y/y) with higher operated production and depletable base .
  • Mineral/non‑operating softness: Mineral and royalty revenues fell 12% y/y to $29.9M on lower crude oil production volumes despite higher realized prices .
  • Liquidity strain: Negative working capital (~$157.3M), planned capex ($750–$850M next 12 months) and targeted ~$400M incremental capital in 2025 underscore funding reliance amid commodity price volatility .

Financial Results

Consolidated Performance vs Prior Year and (Estimates not available)

MetricQ1 2024 (oldest)Q1 2025 (newest)Consensus Estimate
Revenue ($USD Millions)$40.680 $115.747 N/A (S&P Global consensus unavailable)
Income from Operations ($USD Millions)$8.637 $39.160 N/A (S&P Global consensus unavailable)
Net Income (Loss) ($USD Millions)$(8.405) $5.599 N/A (S&P Global consensus unavailable)
EBITDA ($USD Millions)$21.899 $71.984 N/A (S&P Global consensus unavailable)
Net Income Margin (%)(20.7%) 4.8% N/A (S&P Global consensus unavailable)

Note: EPS not presented; company is an LLC and does not report EPS in Q1 2025 10‑Q .

Segment Breakdown (Revenue and Operating Profit)

Metric ($USD Millions)Q1 2024 (oldest)Q1 2025 (newest)
Mineral & Non‑Operating Revenue$33.995 $29.924
Operating Revenue$6.678 $85.772
Securities Revenue$15.561 $29.841
Eliminations$(15.554) $(29.790)
Segment Operating Profit – Mineral & Non‑Operating$10.491 $7.658
Segment Operating Profit – Operating$0.902 $36.257
Segment Operating Profit – Securities$12.787 $24.997
Eliminations$(15.543) $(29.752)

KPIs (Volumes, Realized Prices, Costs)

KPIQ1 2024 (oldest)Q1 2025 (newest)
Total Production (boe, 6:1)1,007,828 1,759,320
Average Daily Production (boe/d)11,290 19,548
Crude Oil Volume (Bbl)974,198 1,552,609
Natural Gas Volume (Mcf)156,210 712,492
NGL Volume (Bbl)7,595 87,962
Avg Realized Oil Price ($/Bbl)$64.51 $70.50
Avg Realized Gas Price ($/Mcf)$2.48 $3.13
Avg Realized NGL Price ($/Bbl)$24.48 $27.95
Operating Costs incl. Taxes ($/boe)$13.69 $18.01

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Operated Wells (Gross / Net)Next 12 monthsNot disclosed75–85 gross; 45.0–51.0 net New
Capital Expenditures ($USD)Next 12 monthsNot disclosed$750–$850M New
Capital Raising Target ($USD)FY 2025Not disclosed~$400M additional debt New
Hedge Volumes (Oil)2025–2027Not disclosed~4.6MMbbl, Wtd. avg strike ~$63.57/bbl New
Covenant StatusQ1 2025N/AIn compliance as of March 31, 2025 Maintained

No explicit revenue, margin, OpEx, OI&E, tax rate or dividend guidance provided in Q1 materials .

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

No Q1 2025 earnings call transcript or press releases were found after searching; analysis relies on 8‑K and 10‑Q filings.

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q‑2 and Q‑1)Current Period (Q1 2025)Trend
Operated ramp (PhoenixOp)First wells began production in Q1/Q2 2024; revenue $125.6M for 2024 37 producing wells; operating revenue $85.8M; plan for 75–85 gross wells next 12 months Accelerating
Commodity price sensitivityVolatile; plan built on ~$72/bbl oil and ~$3.94/mcf gas for 2025 Recent drop to ~$63/bbl and ~$3.19/mmbtu (May 12) noted; monitoring plan Cautious
Hedging disciplineRequired under Fortress covenants ~4.6MMbbl hedged at ~$63.57/bbl; PV‑10 improved vs prior periods Risk‑mitigating
Tariffs/macroMonitoring 2025 tariff impacts; primarily steel casing Expect immaterial 2025 financial impact; watch costs Watchful
Liquidity/LeverageHigh debt load; funding growth via bonds/credit ~$1.084B debt; negative working capital; ~$400M incremental capital needed Elevated risk
Internal controlsMaterial weaknesses identified in 2024 audits Remediation underway (staffing, consultants, procedures) Improving (early stage)

Management Commentary

  • “Product sales accounted for over 72% of our total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2025, and we expect to derive a greater portion of our total revenues from product sales… in the future.”
  • “As of March 31, 2025, PhoenixOp had placed 37 wells into production and had an additional 41 wells in various stages of development.”
  • “We believe the company is well‑positioned to navigate a lower‑price environment… we may determine to adjust our business plan by adjusting capital expenditures, decreasing drilling operations, and/or reducing production plans.”
  • “We are in compliance with all debt covenants as of March 31, 2025.”

Q&A Highlights

No public Q&A available; no earnings call transcript found. Key clarifications come from MD&A: hedge coverage and covenant compliance , capital needs and drilling plan , commodity price sensitivity and potential plan adjustments .

Estimates Context

  • Wall Street consensus estimates via S&P Global were unavailable for PHXE‑P due to missing CIQ mapping; therefore, no beat/miss determination can be made.

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Operated production is now the growth engine: PhoenixOp’s contribution transformed the P&L and EBITDA; continued well turn‑in‑line cadence is the central driver of 2025 cash generation .
  • Funding path matters: with ~$1.084B debt, negative working capital, and ~$400M incremental debt targeted for 2025, access to credit markets and execution on the Registered Notes program are pivotal .
  • Hedge book supports cash flows: ~4.6MMbbl hedged at ~$63.57/bbl dampens downside but limits upside; monitor basis differentials and derivative mark‑to‑market .
  • Watch interest expense and depletion: rising operated volumes bring higher DD&A and lease operating costs; Fortress SOFR+7.10% and unsecured bonds elevate cash interest outlays .
  • Operational delivery commitments: PhoenixOp committed to deliver 2.2MMbbl through 2030; failure incurs shortfall fees—execution in ND counties is critical .
  • Risk governance: internal control remediation underway; continued improvements should reduce reporting risk over time .
  • Trading implications: credit investors should track monthly production, covenant ratios, hedging coverage, and capital raise pace; equity‑like securities sentiment hinges on commodity prices and the company’s ability to fund the aggressive drilling plan at reasonable cost .