Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Frederick Staudmyer

Secretary and Chief Human Resources Officer at PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORPPATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP
Executive

About Frederick Staudmyer

Frederick K. Staudmyer (age 69) is Secretary and Chief Human Resources Officer of Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK) and EVP/Chief Administrative Officer of Patriot Bank, N.A., overseeing human resources, retail and business banking, corporate governance, property development, and facilities management; he has held these roles since November 2014 . His background spans >30 years in HR and corporate leadership, including Assistant Dean at Cornell’s Johnson Graduate School of Management; CHRO roles at Ziff Communications and Ziff Davis Publishing; talent leadership at Chase Manhattan Bank (now JPMorgan Chase); and co-founder/President/COO of a national legal services and staffing company; he holds an MBA from Cornell Johnson and a BS from Cornell ILR and serves on the Board of the Human Services Council of Connecticut . Company performance context: PNBK reported net income of $6.161 million in 2022, net losses of $4.179 million in 2023 and $39.882 million in 2024; total shareholder return (TSR) indexed to an initial $100 investment was $59.38 (2022), $26.88 (2023), and $15.20 (2024) .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Cornell University – Johnson Graduate School of ManagementAssistant DeanLeadership in graduate business education and administrative oversight
Chase Manhattan Bank (now JPMorgan Chase)Directed talent acquisition and developmentBuilt talent pipelines and leadership development in large financial institution
Ziff CommunicationsChief Human Resources OfficerLed HR strategy across media/communications businesses
Ziff Davis PublishingChief Human Resources OfficerDrove HR operations and organizational development in publishing
National legal services & staffing companyCo‑founder; President & COOFounded and operated national services platform for 7+ years

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYears
Human Services Council of ConnecticutDirector (Board of Directors)
MBA Career Services CouncilDirector (past)
Cornell University – Entrepreneurial and Personal Enterprise ProgramAdvisory Council Member (past)

Fixed Compensation

  • Not disclosed for Staudmyer in the 2024–2025 Summary Compensation Tables; he is not listed among named executive officers (NEOs) for those years .

Performance Compensation

2017 Executive Compensation Incentive Plan (structure-level, applies to President and all EVPs)

FeatureTerms
Award basisBalance of bank results and individual executive performance; designed for safe & sound practices
Payout mix50% cash, 50% restricted stock awards vesting over three years (under the 2017 Plan)
Awards in recent yearsNo awards issued under the 2017 Plan during 2023 and 2022

2025 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan – Change-in-Control and Adjustments (plan-level)

ProvisionTerms
CIC vesting (no replacement award)Options/SARs become fully vested; full-value awards vest in full; performance awards vest at greater of target or actual to measurement date
CIC vesting (replacement award)No acceleration at CIC; if terminated within 24 months for qualifying reasons, replacement awards vest in full and options/SARs exercisable per specified windows (double‑trigger)
Replacement award definitionMust match type, value at CIC date, relate to public equity of survivor, have substantially identical vesting/terms, and be no less favorable to participant
Adjustments for transactions/share changesCommittee may adjust share limits, award counts, and exercise prices for corporate transactions, stock splits, spinoffs, extraordinary dividends, etc.
Regulatory limitsNo acceleration if impermissible under FDIC or other governmental rules
RepricingExplicit prohibition of option/SAR repricing without shareholder approval
Plan maximumsUp to 20% of then‑outstanding shares (not less than 10,000,000); no new grants under 2020 plan after Effective Date

Equity Ownership & Alignment

MetricValueNotes
Beneficial ownership (common)4,522 shares; <1% of classAs of record date; percent reflects “less than 1%” designation
Shares outstanding (record date)76,259,670For computing ownership context
Unvested equity awards (12/31/2024)2,639Outstanding equity awards at FY‑end
Section 16(a) complianceLate Form 4 filing in connection with restricted stock grantCompany disclosed late filings for several executives including Staudmyer
Anti‑hedging/pledging policyBoard has not adopted a hedging policyNo hedging policy in 2025 and 2024 proxies; pledging status not specified
Clawback policyAdopted Nov 30, 2023Compensation Committee may recoup erroneously awarded compensation upon accounting restatement

Employment Terms

  • No individual employment agreement or severance/change‑of‑control terms specific to Staudmyer are disclosed in the 2025 proxy; employment agreements referenced pertain to other executives (e.g., Sugarman, Simmons, Miranda) . Plan‑level CIC provisions apply to equity awards as described above .

Performance & Company Context

MetricFY 2022FY 2023FY 2024
Net income (loss) ($000s)6,161 (4,179) (39,882)
TSR – value of $100 initial investment$59.38 $26.88 $15.20

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: Staudmyer’s direct common ownership is modest (4,522 shares, <1%), with 2,639 unvested awards at 12/31/2024; alignment via equity is present but limited in magnitude relative to total shares outstanding .
  • Governance signals: Late Section 16 Form 4 filing indicates process/control friction; company has a clawback policy (restatement‑triggered recoupment) but lacks a hedging policy, which reduces alignment protections against downside hedging for insiders .
  • Incentive design: The EVP‑level 2017 Plan (cash/RS vesting mix) emphasizes performance linkage, but the absence of awards in 2023–2022 suggests limited variable incentive realization in recent years; the 2025 Omnibus Plan adds structured CIC/double‑trigger mechanisms and anti‑repricing protections .
  • Retention risk: Tenure since 2014 suggests institutional knowledge and low near‑term transition risk; lack of disclosed individual severance or employment protections for Staudmyer implies retention relies more on role continuity and plan‑level equity than on contract economics .
  • Trading pressure assessment: Without Form 4 transaction data here, direct selling pressure cannot be assessed; however, small unvested award count and modest ownership imply limited mechanical selling from vest schedule alone, while the absence of a hedging policy could permit risk‑reducing transactions unless otherwise restricted by internal policy or blackout periods .