PI
PodcastOne, Inc. (PODC)·Q2 2026 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Record Q2 FY26 revenue of $15.2M (+22% YoY) and Adjusted EBITDA of $1.1M (vs. $(0.4)M LY), with GAAP net loss improving to $(1.0)M ($(0.04)/sh) . Revenue beat S&P Global consensus ($14.3M*) and EPS was slightly better than the $(0.045*) Street loss; Street EBITDA estimate was $0.61M*, while the company reported $1.09M Adjusted EBITDA (company emphasizes non-GAAP) .
- Management raised FY26 guidance: Revenue to $56–60M (from $55–60M) and Adjusted EBITDA to $4.5–6.0M (from $3–5M), citing strength in AI-enabled adtech, direct sales, and scaled partnerships .
- Strategic catalysts: expanded Amazon ART19 partnership to a $20M+ annual run-rate and a Fortune 250 streaming partner to $26M+ run-rate; PodRoll marketplace up 71% YoY and now a seven-figure channel .
- Liquidity and operations: zero debt, quarter-end cash ~$2.8M; management flagged stronger direct sales (higher CPMs) and improved efficiency; G&A elevated by stock-based comp (adjusted out) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Revenue and profitability momentum: “we achieved record revenue of $15.2 million” and Adjusted EBITDA of $1.1M, reflecting diversified growth and AI-enabled tools (PodRoll, Programmatic, Amazon ART19) .
- Adtech and marketplace scaling: PodRoll “generated a 71% increase… nearly tripled since last year… now a 7-figure revenue generating tool,” and programmatic/ART19 revenues rose 14% QoQ from Q1 .
- Direct sales strength: pacing at an all-time high for the quarter, supporting higher CPMs; waterfall prioritizes direct sales over programmatic/ART19, enhancing yield .
What Went Wrong
- Profitability still below breakeven on GAAP: Q2 GAAP net loss $(0.98)M; GAAP operating loss $(0.98)M; gross margin remains ~10–11% .
- Elevated G&A from stock-based comp: CFO noted higher stock comp driving G&A; professional fees higher in Q2 (expected to ease) .
- Limited Street coverage: only ~2 estimates in S&P Global, increasing volatility in consensus comparisons and highlighting model differences between EBITDA and company’s Adjusted EBITDA focus (Street EBITDA consensus vs. company-reported Adjusted EBITDA*) [GetEstimates]*.
Financial Results
Summary vs prior quarters (oldest → newest)
Q2 FY26 vs S&P Global Consensus
Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.
Balance Sheet & Liquidity (Q2 FY26)
- Cash and cash equivalents: $2.75M (vs. $1.87M at Q1 and $1.08M at FY25 YE) .
- Debt: “zero debt on our balance sheet” (management) .
- Total assets: $22.57M; equity $14.71M .
KPIs and Operating Metrics
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- President Kit Gray: “we achieved record revenue of $15.2 million, reflecting the strength of our diversified business model and the success of our AI-powered tools that enhance discovery, monetization, and production across our network. Platforms like PodRoll, PodcastOne Pro, and our programmatic channels continue to drive meaningful growth” .
- On marketplace momentum: “PodRoll… generated a 71% increase… now a 7-figure revenue generating tool… Programmatic and Amazon’s ART19 revenues saw a 14% increase from Q1” .
- On direct sales strength: “our direct sales… are really driving some significant growth… maybe less impressions available for the programmatic marketplaces and even ART19 Amazon, but much higher CPMs” .
- CFO Ryan Carhart: “Revenue… was $15,200,000… Operating loss… $975,000… Net loss… $975,000 or $0.04 per share… Adjusted EBITDA… $1,100,000… zero debt… and $2,800,000 in cash” .
Q&A Highlights
- Podtrac ranking vs real growth: Rankings are cyclical and subscription-dependent; management prioritizes revenue growth, sellout rates, and CPMs as truer indicators .
- AI adoption cadence: Tools and capabilities materially enhanced over last 6–12 months; test-and-activate approach drives operational and production efficiency .
- Expense cadence: S&M level indicative of go-forward; G&A higher on SBC and pro fees (expected to moderate), with SBC adjusted out of Adjusted EBITDA .
- Amazon ART19 expansion mechanics: Tiered MG increases tied to impression thresholds; sustained growth in inventory and demand supports $20M+ run-rate .
- Guide to high end: Maintain momentum in consumption, new programs, strong direct sales, and continued ART19 performance; closing a few large content/ad deals would help .
Estimates Context
- Q2 FY26: Revenue beat ($15.16M actual vs $14.26M* consensus), EPS slightly better (actual $(0.04) vs $(0.045)). S&P Global EBITDA consensus $0.61M differs from company-reported Adjusted EBITDA $1.09M (company emphasizes non-GAAP) .
- Forward quarters: S&P Global revenue consensus implies ~$14.98M* (Q3) and ~$15.75M* (Q4), with EPS losses narrowing (Q3: $(0.03), Q4: $(0.02)) [GetEstimates]*.
- Implications: Street models likely need upward revenue revisions post-beat; clarify EBITDA basis (GAAP vs Adjusted) in models given company guidance is on Adjusted EBITDA.
Values marked with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Revenue/Adj. EBITDA momentum with raised FY26 guidance (floor lifted on revenue; midpoint raised on profitability) positions PODC for estimate revisions and potential multiple support .
- Mix improving toward higher-yield direct sales with AI-enabled adtech (PodRoll, Booster, FlightPath) and scaled distribution (ART19), supporting CPMs and margin trajectory .
- Strategic partnerships scaling (ART19 $20M+ run-rate; Fortune 250 partner $26M+ run-rate) provide visibility and capacity to tier up guarantees .
- Liquidity improved; zero debt and rising cash offer flexibility for talent acquisition and selective M&A in content/tech .
- Watch gross margin progression (still ~10–11%); management targets incremental improvement via talent renegotiation, mix shift, and operating efficiencies .
- SBC remains a tool for growth and cash preservation; monitor dilution vs. cash margin gains and G&A normalization as pro fees subside .
- Near-term trading lens: Raised guide + revenue beat + direct sales commentary are positive; low coverage/estimate count and EBITDA definition differences can create volatility around prints.