Sign in

Susan Balaguer

Chief Human Resources Officer at PARSONSPARSONS
Executive

About Susan Balaguer

Susan M. Balaguer is Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO) of Parsons Corporation, appointed effective July 16, 2021. She has 30+ years of global HR experience, including large-scale integrations and M&A across public and private companies; prior roles include CHRO at Serco North America and Engility, SVP HR Operations at CACI, and over twenty years of progressive HR leadership at Raytheon . Company performance under the most recent fiscal year includes record revenue of $6.8B (+24% YoY), record adjusted EBITDA of $605M (+30% YoY) with margin of 9.0%, and record operating cash flow of $524M, metrics that directly underpin the NEO incentive design .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Serco North AmericaChief Human Resources OfficerNot disclosedLed enterprise HR; experience spans M&A and large-scale business integrations .
EngilityChief Human Resources OfficerNot disclosedLed HR for a federal contractor during portfolio integration phases .
CACISVP, HR OperationsNot disclosedRan HR operations; supported complex government services workforce .
RaytheonProgressive HR leadership roles20+ yearsDeep defense-industry HR leadership; foundational expertise for talent, integrations .

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsNotes
Parsons DEI CouncilExecutive sponsorNot disclosedExecutive sponsor for Diversity, Equity & Inclusion initiatives .
Mid Atlantic Organizational Development Executive RoundtableMemberNot disclosedExternal roundtable participation on OD/HR topics .

Fixed Compensation

Metric20232024
Base Salary ($)$448,875 $469,074
Target Bonus (%) of Salary75%
Target Bonus ($)$351,806
Actual Bonus Paid ($)$616,900 $624,100
All Other Compensation ($)$57,547 $59,749

All Other Compensation (2024 detail):

ComponentAmount ($)
Life Insurance2,010
Employer ERP Contribution9,242
Employer ESOP Contribution27,600
Employer 401(k) Match6,900
Executive Physical3,996
Financial Planning5,000
Charitable Matching5,000
Total59,749

Performance Compensation

2024 Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) structure and results:

MetricWeightingTarget ($M)Actual ($M)Achievement (%)
Revenue25% 5,900.0 6,750.6 172.1%
Adjusted EBITDA25% 525.0 605.0 176.1%
Awards (bookings)20% 6,000.0 7,039.3 186.6%
Cash Flow20% 380.0 523.6 200.0%
Strategic Goal10% 130.0% weighted factor 13.0%
Overall AIP Payout Factor177.38%
Susan Balaguer AIP Payout ($)$351,806 target $624,100 payout

Long-Term Incentive design (2024 grants):

InstrumentWeightingPerformance MetricsPayout RangerTSR ModifierVesting
PSUs60% of LTI target 50% cumulative adjusted EBITDA; 50% cumulative revenue 0–200% by financial achievement 75–125% vs custom peer benchmark 3-year cliff (2024–2026)
RSUs40% of LTI target Time-basedN/AN/ARatable over 3 years (Mar 9, 2025/2026/2027)

PSU outcomes:

  • 2022–2024 PSU cycle achieved 125% on financial metrics (cumulative awards and gross profit margin-as-sold, adjusted per plan), with rTSR multiplier of 125%, producing a total payout of 156.25%; awards to be paid in March 2025 .

Awards vested in 2024:

MetricNumberValue ($)
PSUs vested (2021–2023 cycle)8,306 $668,965
RSUs vested4,448 $355,017

Equity Ownership & Alignment

Beneficial ownership (as of Feb 14, 2025):

ItemAmount
Total shares beneficially owned43,171; <1% of outstanding
ESOP shares (included above)1,248
PSUs scheduled to vest within 60 days (gross before tax withholding)12,384

Outstanding long-term incentive awards (at Dec 31, 2024; price $92.25/share):

GrantUnitsMarket Value ($)
2024 RSU2,685 247,691
2024 PSU (target units)4,027 371,491
2023 RSU2,660 245,385
2023 PSU (target units)5,985 552,116
2022 RSU (Dec grant)10,829 998,975
2022 RSU (Mar grant)1,762 162,545
2022 PSU (actual eligible units)7,926 731,174

Ownership policies:

  • Executive stock ownership guideline: 3x annual base salary for non-CEO executive officers; compliance measured using trailing 60 trading-day average; as of Dec 31, 2024, continuing NEOs are compliant or tracking appropriately .
  • Anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies prohibit hedging and pledging of Parsons stock for employees and directors .
  • Rule 10b5-1 trading plan required before selling for directors and CEO/CFO direct reports .

Employment Terms

Severance and change-in-control (CIC) provisions:

  • Corporate Vice President Severance Plan: lump sum equal to 4.5× monthly base salary and 4 months COBRA premiums; subject to release and restrictive covenants .
  • CIC Agreements (double-trigger): upon Qualifying Event, receive pro-rata annual bonus, 2× base salary, 2× greater of target bonus or 2-year average bonus, and a lump sum for continuation of medical, life and supplemental disability coverage; 280G excise tax cutback applies if beneficial . Equity awards have CIC acceleration terms per plan .

Potential payments (Susan Balaguer; hypothetical termination at Dec 31, 2024):

ScenarioAIP Payout ($)Cash Severance ($)Benefits ($)LTI Acceleration ($)
Involuntary termination (no CIC)624,100 175,903 670
Retirement624,100 2,877,677
Death or Disability624,100 2,223,315
Involuntary termination in connection with CIC624,100 1,641,759 4,020 3,309,377

Clawbacks:

  • Dodd-Frank compliant clawback for erroneously paid incentive compensation due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements; additional company clawback for detrimental conduct and material restatements; recovery window up to 3 years .

Compensation Peer Group (Benchmarking)

Peer group used for FY2024 compensation decisions: AECOM; Booz Allen Hamilton; CACI; Jacobs; KBR; Kratos Defense & Security; Leidos; Mercury Systems; SAIC; Stantec; Teledyne; Tetra Tech; WSP Global . For 2025 deliberations: Mercury Systems removed; V2X added .

Say-on-Pay & Shareholder Feedback

At the 2024 Annual Meeting, over 98% of shares voted approved the executive compensation program, and the Compensation Committee retained the approach for 2025 (with 2025 annual incentive shifting fully to financial goals) .

Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Mix and performance alignment: Balaguer’s pay emphasizes at-risk components via AIP tied to revenue, adjusted EBITDA, awards, and cash flow, plus PSUs linked to multi-year cumulative adjusted EBITDA and revenue with rTSR modifier; 2024 AIP paid at 177.38% amid record company performance .
  • Equity design shift: PSUs since 2023 measure cumulative revenue and adjusted EBITDA (replacing gross margin-as-sold), indicating emphasis on scalable, profitable growth; rTSR modifier maintains market-relative discipline .
  • Governance features: No employment contracts, double-trigger CIC vesting, no option repricing, no tax gross-ups for parachute payments; robust clawbacks; anti-hedging/pledging; mandated 10b5-1 plans pre-sale .

Risk Indicators & Red Flags

  • Hedging/pledging: prohibited, reducing misalignment risk .
  • Option repricing: prohibited under plan .
  • Tax gross-ups: not provided for CIC payments .
  • Section 16: company reported withholding-related Form 4 timing issues historically; otherwise compliant through early 2025 .
  • Compensation risk oversight: multi-year vesting and balanced metrics; caps on payouts; clawbacks in place .

Equity Ownership & Insider Selling Pressure (Vesting)

  • Upcoming RSU vesting cadence from 2024 grants suggests March 9 in 2026 and 2027, with PSUs on a March payout timeline post performance cycles; sales are subject to 10b5-1 plans and anti-pledging/hedging constraints, moderating discretionary selling pressure .

Expertise & Qualifications

  • 30+ years in HR spanning defense, intelligence, and infrastructure industries; extensive experience in M&A, private equity and large-scale integrations; external DEI leadership roles .

Investment Implications

  • Strong pay-for-performance alignment: AIP and PSU structures directly linked to top-line growth, EBITDA, cash generation, and market-relative TSR; recent record performance drove above-target payouts, supporting retention and alignment .
  • Retention risk moderated: Double-trigger CIC protections, multi-year vesting, and ownership guidelines (3× salary) indicate balanced retention economics without shareholder-unfriendly features (no gross-ups, no single-trigger) .
  • Trading signals: Scheduled March vesting cycles and policy-required 10b5-1 plans imply predictable potential supply windows rather than opportunistic selling; anti-pledging reduces collateral-driven sales risk .
  • Governance quality: High say-on-pay support (98%), independent compensation committee, robust clawbacks and risk controls suggest low governance friction and credible incentive design .