Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Kenneth Shropshire

Director at Goal Acquisitions
Board

About Kenneth L. Shropshire

Independent director of Goal Acquisitions Corp. (PUCK). Age 69 with deep expertise in sports business and law; emeritus professor at Wharton (since 1986) and Adidas Distinguished Professor of Global Sport at Arizona State University, where he is CEO of the Global Sport Institute (since 2017). He has served on the Moelis & Company board since 2014; holds an economics degree from Stanford and a JD from Columbia; former President of the Sports Lawyers Association .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Wharton School (University of Pennsylvania)Faculty, Emeritus Professor; Founder/Director, Wharton Sports Business InitiativeFaculty since 1986; WSBI founded 2004, director until 2017 Developed NFL/NFLPA Player Business Education Transition Program; led sports business research center
Arizona State UniversityAdidas Distinguished Professor of Global Sport; CEO, Global Sport InstituteSince 2017 Leads Global Sport Institute; academic-industry convening
Moelis & CompanyDirectorSince 2014 Board-level oversight; finance sector exposure
Manatt, Phelps, Rothenberg & TunneyAttorneyPrior to 1984 Olympics Legal practice; sports event advisory (1984 Olympic Games)
Sports Lawyers AssociationPresident (former)Not disclosedLed largest organization of sports lawyers globally

External Roles

OrganizationRoleTenure
Altius Sports PartnersAdvisorNot disclosed
Arctos Sports PartnersAdvisorNot disclosed
Overtime EliteAdvisorNot disclosed
Pro Sports AssemblyAdvisorNot disclosed
Moelis & CompanyDirectorSince 2014

Board Governance

  • Committee assignments: Audit Committee member; committee chaired by Donna Orender; members are Orender, David Falk, and Kenneth Shropshire; all three are independent directors. Orender is designated the audit committee financial expert (Shropshire is not designated as the financial expert) .
  • Independence: Shropshire is classified as an “independent director” under Nasdaq listing rules; independent directors hold regular executive sessions .
  • Compensation practice (pre-business combination): No cash compensation paid to directors/officers; reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses only; future compensation may be determined post-business combination and disclosed at that time .
  • Control/voting power context: As of April 16, 2025, the sponsor, directors, officers and their affiliates collectively controlled ~95.7% of voting power (7,136,250 shares), positioning insiders to drive outcomes on extensions and transactions .

Fixed Compensation

ComponentAmountNotes
Annual retainer (cash)$0No cash compensation paid to directors prior to business combination
Committee membership fees$0Not paid pre-business combination
Committee chair fees$0Not paid pre-business combination
Meeting fees$0Not paid pre-business combination
Expense reimbursementAs incurredReimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses; audit committee reviews quarterly

Performance Compensation

Metric/InstrumentStatusNotes
RSUs/PSUs (annual grants)Not disclosedNo director equity grant program disclosed pre-business combination
Stock optionsNot disclosedNo option grants disclosed to directors pre-business combination
Performance plan metrics (Revenue, EBITDA, TSR, ESG)None disclosedNo performance-tied director compensation disclosed
Change-in-control terms (single/double trigger)Not disclosedSPAC structure; director CIC provisions not disclosed
Clawback provisions (director comp)Not disclosedClawback disclosure not provided for directors

Other Directorships & Interlocks

CompanyRoleSectorInterlocks/Notes
Moelis & CompanyDirectorInvestment BankingExternal public company directorship; no disclosed interlocks with PUCK counterparties

Expertise & Qualifications

  • Sports business and law scholar and practitioner, with governance experience across sports and finance; extensive advisory network in sports and media .
  • Legal training (JD, Columbia) and economics background (Stanford) underpin committee oversight; serves on PUCK’s audit committee .
  • Independence confirmed under Nasdaq rules; participates in independent director executive sessions .

Equity Ownership

MetricJul 2023Oct 2023Jul 2024Apr 2025
Shares beneficially owned75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000
Ownership % of outstanding<1% <1% <1% 1.0%
NotesExcludes sponsor-held securities; disclaims beneficial ownership except to extent of pecuniary interest Same Same Same

Governance Assessment

  • Strengths: Independent status with audit committee service; presence of a Code of Ethics and a related-party policy with audit committee review; any affiliate business combination requires an independent fairness opinion and approval by disinterested independent directors, which mitigates conflict risks .
  • Alignment: Direct beneficial ownership of 75,000 shares provides skin-in-the-game; however, director equity arises from founder share ecosystem, which can create incentives to favor consummating a transaction to avoid founder securities becoming worthless .
  • RED FLAGS:
    • High insider voting power (~95.7%) concentrated among sponsor, directors, officers, and affiliates—can diminish minority shareholder influence on extensions or deal approvals .
    • SPAC-specific conflicts: Directors have fiduciary obligations to other entities and are allowed to renounce certain corporate opportunities; although contractual arrangements require presenting suitable opportunities to PUCK, competing duties may constrain objectivity .
    • Compensation opacity: No disclosed director compensation structure (cash or equity) pre-business combination; future compensation to be set after a transaction, limiting pre-transaction benchmarking and pay-for-performance transparency .
  • Related-party safeguards: Audit committee oversight of reimbursements and related-party transactions; independent director executive sessions .
  • Attendance/engagement: No meeting attendance rates disclosed; independent director executive sessions are planned, indicating some governance rigor .

Overall implication: Shropshire brings high-caliber governance and domain expertise; independence and audit committee roles are positives. SPAC structure-driven conflicts—founder-share incentives, insider voting power, and deferred compensation disclosures—are material risks that investors should monitor through transaction fairness processes, related-party reviews, and post-merger compensation disclosures .