QC
QUANTUM CORP /DE/ (QMCO)·Q2 2016 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Revenue of $117.0M came in below original Q2 guidance ($120–$130M) after a late-quarter order surge and disk-part shortages created $7.8M backlog; non‑GAAP gross margin fell to 39.9% and non‑GAAP EPS was −$0.03, marking a tougher enterprise storage environment .
- Scale‑out storage product+services grew 17% YoY (33% including backlog) to $29.9M, the 17th straight quarter of YoY growth; data protection revenue improved sequentially (disk and tape) despite pricing pressure on low‑margin devices/media .
- Q3 guidance: revenue $130–$140M, non‑GAAP gross margin 42–43%, non‑GAAP OpEx $48–$50M, non‑GAAP EPS $0.02–$0.03; management emphasized disciplined tape media pricing to protect profit and uncertainty in large/mega deal timing .
- Liquidity catalyst: repaid ~$81M of converts on Oct 5 using $66M revolver draw and $16M cash; interest run‑rate guided to ~$1.5M/quarter with $139M total debt outstanding going forward .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Scale‑out momentum: “Total scale‑out storage and related service revenue grew 17% YoY and 33% including backlog,” with strong growth across surveillance (+200% YoY) and technical applications (+140% YoY; +200% incl. backlog) .
- Sequential data protection uptick: “Data protection and related service revenue was up approximately 8% sequentially…including tape automation, disk‑based backup, and devices and media,” with DXi4700 revenue +39% YoY and +144% QoQ .
- Cash generation and backlog quality: Cash from operations was $11.2M and backlog ($7.8M) reflected strong late‑quarter demand, especially in scale‑out (backlog $4.1M) expected to ship in Q3 .
-
What Went Wrong
- Revenue miss vs original guidance driven by elongated sales cycles and parts shortages: total revenue $117.0M was below the $120–$130M July guide; backlog spiked to $7.8M due to last‑day orders and disk supplier shortages .
- Mix and price pressure compressed margins: non‑GAAP gross margin fell to 39.9% (vs 46.3% YoY) as higher‑margin service/royalty declined and commodity pricing intensified; non‑GAAP operating margin −5.0% (vs +6.9% YoY) .
- Large/megadeal drought: “We had no megadeals…versus several deals in Q2 of last year,” and scale‑out deals >$200K were ~10% lower YoY, highlighting market softness and lumpy deal timing .
Financial Results
Segment revenue breakout (product + related services unless noted):
Additional KPIs (Q2 2016):
- Backlog: $7.8M total; scale‑out backlog $4.1M .
- Cash from operations: $11.2M; cash & equivalents end‑of‑quarter $65.3M .
- Scale‑out run‑rate growth: deals ≤$1M up 90% in 1H FY16 incl. backlog .
Year‑over‑year (Q2 2016 vs Q2 2015) reference points:
- Total revenue: $117.0M vs $135.1M .
- Non‑GAAP EPS: −$0.03 vs $0.03 .
- Service revenue: $37.3M vs $39.2M .
- Royalty revenue: $8.7M vs $10.7M .
- Tape automation: $48.7M vs $64.7M .
- Scale‑out prod+svc: $29.9M vs $25.5M (as reported prod+svc prior year) .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Our total revenue of $117 million was slightly below our guidance due primarily to…an unusually high number of customers placing orders on the last day of the quarter…and a shortage of parts from our disk suppliers…We ended the quarter with sales backlog of approximately $8 million, basically all of which we have now shipped.” — Jon Gacek, CEO .
- “Total scale‑out storage and related service revenue grew 17% year‑over‑year and 33%, if we include the backlog…we had no scale‑out storage megadeals in the quarter…sales cycles [have] elongated.” — Jon Gacek, CEO .
- “Non‑GAAP gross margin was 39.9% in Q2 compared to 46.3% in the second quarter of fiscal ’15…reflecting a decrease in higher‑margin service and royalty revenue and increased pricing pressure.” — Linda Breard, CFO .
- “We will manage our tape media revenue to maximize profit versus trying to maximize revenue.” — Jon Gacek, CEO .
- “On October 5, we repaid $81 million of convertible debt…To fund this transaction, we used $16.3 million in cash and $66.1 million from our $75 million revolver.” — Linda Breard, CFO .
Q&A Highlights
- OpEx discipline: Management is reducing spend where opportunities are lower while reallocating toward areas with stronger prospects; Q3 non‑GAAP OpEx guided to $48–$50M .
- Surveillance sales cycles and product tuning: New XLS appliances and expanded VMS partnerships are tailored to the market; mix of short‑cycle and larger, longer‑cycle deals expected .
- Royalties trajectory: Expect some uptick with LTO‑7 offset by ongoing declines in older generations; near‑term royalty around current levels .
- Tape/disk outlook: Traditional storage environment remains “super choppy”; funnels growing but purchases can only be delayed so long—management taking it quarter by quarter .
- Working capital: Accounts payable uptick tied to back‑end loaded quarter; ongoing tight balance sheet management .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global/Capital IQ consensus estimates for Q2 FY2016 could not be retrieved due to a request limit error; therefore, comparisons to Wall Street consensus are unavailable for this period. Values would normally be sourced from S&P Global; in their absence, rely on company guidance and reported results [GetEstimates error].
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Backlog‑driven revenue deferral rather than demand weakness: $7.8M orders pushed to Q3 due to late‑quarter timing and parts constraints, with scale‑out backlog $4.1M—supportive of near‑term revenue catch‑up .
- Scale‑out remains the growth engine, diversifying beyond M&E: Surveillance (+200% YoY) and technical applications (+140% YoY) broaden TAM; watch for conversion of large/mega deals as sales cycles normalize .
- Margin pressure reflects mix and pricing; Q3 guide implies stabilization: Non‑GAAP GM fell to 39.9%, but guided to ~42–43% in Q3 as backlog ships and media pricing remains disciplined .
- Debt profile improved and interest expense lowered: Post‑repayment, ~$139M debt with ~3.75% average rate; interest run‑rate ~$1.5M/quarter—reduces financial drag .
- Trading setup: Q3 revenue guide $130–$140M and EPS $0.02–$0.03 (non‑GAAP) sets expectations; upside hinges on large deal closures and surveillance momentum, downside tied to ongoing enterprise storage softness and media pricing .
- Estimate revisions likely focus on mix and margins: With royalty and service soft YoY and disciplined media approach, consensus (once available) may recalibrate margin assumptions toward 42–43% near term .
- Execution watch‑items: Large/megadeal closure rates, supply chain availability (disk parts), and continued growth in run‑rate scale‑out deals to reduce lumpiness .