QC
QuantumScape Corp (QS)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- QuantumScape delivered a milestone Q3: began shipping Cobra-based QSE-5 B1 samples, unveiled the Ducati V21L solid-state demonstration with VW Group, and introduced “customer billings,” totaling $12.8M, reflecting commercialization progress while remaining pre-revenue .
- Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA loss improved to $61.4M, and FY25 guidance tightened/improved to a $245–$260M loss; CapEx guidance was lowered to $30–$40M as efficiency gains and timing changes took hold .
- Liquidity ended at ~$1.0B; cash runway extended through the end of the decade (previously “into 2029”), supported by completed ATM equity program and PowerCo inflows .
- Key catalysts: the Ducati live demo validating anode-free solid-state performance, customer billings evidencing the licensing model, and deeper ecosystem partnerships (Corning, Murata) to industrialize ceramic separators .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- B1 sample shipments commenced using the Cobra process, achieving a core 2025 goal and advancing towards automotive-grade reliability via the Eagle pilot line .
- First live vehicle demo: Ducati V21L powered by QSE-5 cells showcased high energy density and fast charging; management highlighted it as a strategic blueprint milestone toward series production before decade-end .
- Commercial traction and ecosystem build-out: $12.8M customer billings in Q3; expanded ceramics partnerships (Corning, Murata) to scale separator manufacturing in a capital-light model .
Quote: “Our first ever invoices totaling $12.8 million in Q3 2025 are by themselves an important commercial milestone… evidence of our capital-light business model at work.” — CFO Kevin Hettrich .
What Went Wrong
- Continued GAAP losses as QS remains pre-revenue: Q3 GAAP net loss of $105.8M; the model still carries high R&D and ecosystem ramp costs .
- EBITDA vs SPGI consensus shows a miss, reflecting heavier near-term operating intensity; management relies on non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA (-$61.4M) but GAAP EBITDA remained deeply negative .
- Execution risks persist: management reiterated substantial industrialization and scale-up challenges (Cobra, Eagle Line, licensing), and detailed broad forward-looking risk factors (technology, production, IP, finance, market) .
Financial Results
Notes:
- Revenue is effectively pre-revenue; QS introduced “customer billings” as an operational metric (not a GAAP substitute) .
- EBITDA figures with asterisk reflect S&P Global data (see Estimates Context); Adjusted EBITDA from company filings.
- Values with asterisk retrieved from S&P Global.
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Context:
- Changes driven by efficiency gains, process improvements (Cobra), timing of equipment orders, and customer inflows; QS will pivot from cash runway updates to reporting customer billings .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We began shipping Cobra-based QSE-5 B1 samples, completing another of our key annual goals for 2025… Equipment for certain key assembly steps has already been installed on the Eagle Line.” — CEO Siva Sivaram .
- “Adjusted EBITDA loss was $61.4M in Q3… we improve our full-year guidance for Adjusted EBITDA loss to $245M–$260M… Capital expenditures in the third quarter were $9.6M.” — CFO Kevin Hettrich .
- “Customer billings… are a key operational metric… evidence of our capital-light business model at work. Customer billings in Q3 were $12.8M.” — CFO Kevin Hettrich .
- “We unveiled our launch program with the Volkswagen Group… Ducati V21L… a first-of-its-kind vehicle demonstration.” — CEO Siva Sivaram .
- “We announced an agreement with Corning to jointly develop ceramic separator manufacturing capabilities based on our Cobra process… progressing with Murata Manufacturing.” — CEO Siva Sivaram .
Q&A Highlights
- Ceramics partnerships and scaling: Management explained complementary roles for Corning and Murata to ramp separator production, leveraging partners’ manufacturing expertise and balance sheets to enable capital-efficient commercialization .
- Customer billings metric: Defined as invoice value regardless of accounting treatment; timing differences may cause divergence between billings and cash; VW PowerCo collaboration-phase proceeds create a liability due to related-party accounting, later accruing to equity (not P&L) .
- Timeline to series production: VW Group’s “before end of decade” target clarified as 2029; QS emphasized parallel paths with other OEMs and tailoring tech to each customer’s roadmap .
- Additional OEMs and JDA: Active engagements continue; QS defers announcements to OEMs but telegraphed progress toward licensing-oriented deals .
Estimates Context
- Q3 EPS beat: Actual EPS of -$0.18 vs SPGI consensus -$0.196; beat of $0.02. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- EBITDA miss: GAAP EBITDA actual -$91.3M vs SPGI consensus -$70.2M; miss of ~$21.1M. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Revenue consensus: 0 across recent periods, consistent with pre-revenue status. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
All values above marked implicitly with asterisk are retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Commercial momentum: The $12.8M customer billings and B1 sample shipments validate QS’s capital-light licensing strategy; watch for continued billings growth and partner-driven industrialization .
- Guidance quality improving: FY25 Adjusted EBITDA loss guidance tightened/improved to $245–$260M and CapEx lowered to $30–$40M, suggesting operational efficiency gains from Cobra and disciplined spend .
- Liquidity and runway: ~$1.0B liquidity and an extended runway “through the end of the decade” reduce near-term financing risk; completed ATM and PowerCo inflows support balance sheet resilience .
- Ecosystem advantage: Corning and Murata collaborations de-risk separator scale-up and accelerate time-to-market; expect additional ecosystem partners to broaden capability .
- Narrative that moves the stock: Ducati V21L live demo plus clarified 2029 series production goal are powerful validation signals; continued evidence of billings and OEM progress are likely share-price catalysts .
- Estimate revisions: With an EPS beat and non-GAAP loss narrowing, analysts may revise near-term EPS; however, GAAP EBITDA miss vs consensus implies persistent operating intensity — model remains pre-revenue with heavy R&D. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Watch risks: Industrialization and scale-up remain complex; related-party accounting for PowerCo inflows may obscure P&L timing; QS will shift disclosures from runway to billings — interpret billings vs cash carefully .
Disclaimer: Estimates marked with asterisk are values retrieved from S&P Global. Non-GAAP measures (Adjusted EBITDA) are per company filings and reconciliations.