RH
Roan Holdings Group Co., Ltd. (RAHGF)·Q3 2016 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2016 delivered strong growth: revenue (total interest and fee income) rose 51.6% year over year to $9.0M, net income rose 34.6% to $3.9M, and basic EPS increased to $0.25; QoQ revenue was roughly flat versus Q2 despite a sharp increase in loan loss provisions, reflecting resilient demand and pricing power .
- Net interest income grew 33.9% YoY to $6.0M; however, provision for loan losses surged to $1.86M (vs. $0.49M in Q3 2015), indicating tighter credit conditions and specific borrower issues that management views as isolated .
- Management reaffirmed FY2016 guidance: revenue $32.7–$34.1M (+16–21% YoY) and net income $16.9–$17.5M (+20–25% YoY); catalysts include new segments (consulting and credit risk analysis), internet-inclusive micro-credit initiatives, and sector expansion into green energy and entertainment .
- No Wall Street (S&P Global) consensus estimates were available for EPS or revenue for Q3 2016; results should be judged versus internal guidance and prior-year/prior-quarter trends (S&P Global consensus unavailable for this ticker/period).
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Revenue and net income reached record nine-month levels; Q3 2016 revenue grew 51.6% YoY to $9.0M and net income grew 34.6% YoY to $3.9M, driven by higher loan utilization, government-supported lending rates, and consulting/credit risk services .
- Pricing power improved: average annual interest rate was 23.3% for nine months 2016 vs. 19.3% last year, contributing to margin strength despite higher funding costs .
- Strategic expansion: initiatives in internet-inclusive financing (micro-loans for individuals), and entry into green energy and entertainment segments position for diversified growth and lower average loan size/duration per plan .
-
What Went Wrong
- Credit costs increased: provision for loan losses rose to $1.86M (Q3 2016) vs. $0.49M (Q3 2015), reflecting tougher economics and isolated borrower-specific issues; special reserves were increased in response .
- Funding costs climbed: total interest expense increased to $1.17M (Q3 2016) vs. $0.98M (Q3 2015), driven by loans from the cost investment investee and bank borrowings .
- Concentration risk: tire supply chain financing represented 57.2% of loan receivables and 57.9% of Q3 interest income, heightening sector exposure during seasonal peaks .
Financial Results
Core P&L comparison (periods ordered oldest → newest)
Margins (derived from cited figures)
Segment revenue (nine months YTD)
KPIs and portfolio indicators
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
(No Q3 2016 earnings call transcript was available; themes below reflect press releases and filings.)
Management Commentary
- “Our revenue and net income for the 2016 nine-month period increased to a record level… due to the continued growth in funding demand in the region, additional funds obtained to serve more customers, higher utilization rate of funds… and higher interest lending rates supported by China’s government policies. Also a major revenue contributor… was our consulting and credit risk analysis business segment.” — Jingping Li, Co-Founder & CEO .
- “Our average annual interest rate for the 2016 nine-month period was 23.3%, vs. 19.3%… Our net income… increased by over 30%… mainly due to higher revenue, lower operating expenses, partially offset by higher total interest expense.” — Jingping Li .
- Reaffirmed 2016 guidance and highlighted progress on P2P lending and establishing the first internet banking platform in the region .
Q&A Highlights
No Q3 2016 earnings call transcript was available; the company announced a conference call for November 15, 2016, with webcast and dial-in details, but no transcript was retrievable in the document catalog .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus estimates (EPS, revenue) for Q3 2016 were unavailable for this ticker due to missing CIQ mapping; as a result, comparisons to Wall Street consensus cannot be provided for this period (S&P Global consensus unavailable for this ticker/period).
- Given the lack of external estimates, portfolio managers should benchmark performance against management’s reaffirmed FY2016 guidance and internal trajectory (YoY/QoQ) .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Strong top-line and bottom-line growth in Q3 despite elevated provisions underscores demand resilience and pricing power; diversification via consulting and credit risk analysis is becoming a meaningful contributor .
- Credit quality requires monitoring: special reserves and higher provisions reflect macro and borrower-specific factors; management views certain issues as isolated and has tightened controls, but sector concentration (tires) elevates risk .
- Funding mix and cost: Interest expense increased with greater use of bank loans and loans from the cost investee; watch refinancing terms (e.g., Great Wall Assets secured loan extension) and potential impact on margins .
- Strategic catalysts: execution on internet-inclusive financing, fintech partnerships, and new sector entries (green energy/entertainment) could expand TAM and reduce average loan size/duration per plan .
- Guidance credibility: FY2016 revenue and net income ranges were reaffirmed; continued delivery vs. these targets should support sentiment amid limited sell-side coverage .
- Dividend capacity and capital allocation signals: ordinary dividend declared/paid in Q4 indicates balance sheet flexibility; monitor preferred dividend obligations and mezzanine equity structure .
- Near-term trading: headline beats vs. prior year and reaffirmed guidance are positives; watch credit costs, sector concentration, and any updates from the announced call/webcast for tone and visibility .