Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

RT

Rubicon Technology, Inc. (RBCN)·Q4 2015 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q4 2015 revenue was $2.456M, down sharply vs Q3 2015 ($5.346M) and Q4 2014 ($8.912M), as Rubicon limited low-priced core sales and built consignment PSS inventory for a key six-inch customer . GAAP EPS was -$0.49; non-GAAP EPS was -$0.38 after a $2.3M raw material revaluation .
  • Revenue landed within prior guidance ($2–$3M), but EPS loss was worse than guided “around -$0.30,” driven by weak sapphire pricing, limited core sales, and consignment production ahead of revenue recognition .
  • Management guided Q1 2016 revenue to $4–$5M and GAAP EPS to -$0.24 to -$0.28, citing ramp in six-inch PSS sales and some rebound in four-inch core demand; wafer cost reductions are expected to begin in Q1 with more substantial progress in Q2 .
  • Strategic focus: accelerate cost reductions, ramp six-inch PSS where Rubicon’s vertical integration is a differentiator, and advance LANCE (large windows) and SapphirEX (sapphire coating) toward production; cash flow improvement is a top priority .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

  • What Went Well

    • Revenue landed within prior guidance ($2–$3M) despite industry pricing pressure; management built consignment inventory for a key six-inch PSS customer to enable Q1 ramp .
    • Progress on optical initiatives: LANCE reached dimensional milestones for unprecedented 36" x 18" x 2" windows; SapphirEX moved toward pilot production with positive customer testing .
    • Clear six-inch PSS strategy leveraging vertical integration from powder to wafer; management sees six-inch PSS as fastest-growing LED substrate subsegment and expects migration as four-inch pricing bottoms .
  • What Went Wrong

    • Severe pricing weakness: Q4 core sales fell to $0.482M from $1.824M in Q3; PSS wafer revenue decreased to $0.404M from $1.373M due to delayed customer timing and weak demand .
    • Gross margin deeply negative (-366%): gross loss of -$8.988M on $2.456M revenue, reflecting low utilization and idle plant costs rising to $2.3M vs $1.8M in Q3 .
    • EPS miss vs prior guidance: GAAP EPS -$0.49 vs “around -$0.30” guided; non-GAAP still -$0.38 even after excluding raw material revaluation and deferred tax estimate change .

Financial Results

MetricQ4 2014Q3 2015Q4 2015
Revenue ($USD Millions)$8.912 $5.346 $2.456
GAAP EPS ($USD)-$0.36 -$1.84 -$0.49
Non-GAAP EPS ($USD)N/A-$0.29 -$0.38
Gross Loss ($USD Millions)-$5.459 -$3.891 -$8.988
Gross Margin (%)-61.3% (calc from revenue/gross loss) -72.8% (calc) -366.2% (calc)

Segment breakdown (Revenue by Product Group):

Segment ($USD Thousands)Q4 2014Q3 2015Q4 2015
Core – 2"$551 $551 $10
Core – 4"$1,233 $1,233 $472
Core – 6"$5 $40 $0
Total Core$1,824 $1,824 $482
Polished Wafers$1,470 $763 $455
PSS Wafers$511 $1,373 $404
R&D$137 $270 $105
Optical & Other$2,043 $1,116 $1,010
Total$8,912 $5,346 $2,456

KPIs and operating metrics:

KPIQ3 2015Q4 2015
Idle Plant Cost ($USD Millions)$1.8 $2.3
Crystal Growth Utilization (%)~40% ~30%
Cash & Equivalents ($USD Millions)$21.428 $21.216
Short-term Investments ($USD Millions)$12.676 $8.895
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities ($USD Millions)$(2.817) $(4.811)

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent Guidance/ActualChange
RevenueQ4 2015$2–$3M $2.456M (actual) Maintained (in range)
GAAP EPSQ4 2015~-$0.30 -$0.49 (actual) Lower (missed guidance)
RevenueQ1 2016N/A$4–$5M New
GAAP EPSQ1 2016N/A-$0.24 to -$0.28 New
Wafer CostsQ1–Q2 2016N/ABegin reduction in Q1; more substantial in Q2 New process trajectory

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q2 2015)Previous Mentions (Q3 2015)Current Period (Q4 2015)Trend
Six-inch PSS adoption$9M PO for 6" PSS; ramp planned; vertical integration advantage Key customer delayed PO start to Jan 1; consignment build in Q4 Customer began drawing consignment in Jan; expect Q1 wafer revenue ~>$2M; majority from six-inch PSS Ramp starting Q1 after Q4 delay
Sapphire pricing & supplyPricing down ~18% QoQ for 2” core; oversupply; currency pressures Market very challenging; excess supply; backlighting weakness Pricing remains depressed; limited core sales; raw material revaluation charge Still weak; inventory clearing slowly
Optical initiatives (LANCE)Building large windows; expand finishing; aim to dominate large-area optics in 1–2 years Qualification progressing; expanding window sizes Hit major milestones; producing up to 36" x 18" x 2" windows in 2016 Advancing toward production
SapphirEX coatingOrdering production reactor; pilot samples across materials Process development; expanding samples Production tool arriving in May; positive customer testing; initial focus markets progressing Moving to pilot/production
Cost reductionsCrystal cost -15% YoY; resource-sharing to cut 4" polishing costs Scaling back growth; idle costs $1.8M; learning transfer from polisher Idle costs rise to $2.3M; wafer cost cuts underway; six-inch cost focus Continued execution; higher idle burden near-term
Capacity utilizationFrom full to ~2/3; polishing under-utilized ~40% crystal growth; utilization to rise with PSS ~30% crystal growth to avoid inventory; wafer consignment built Reduced throughput to manage cash/inventory

Management Commentary

  • “As expected, the fourth quarter was a particularly challenging one… excess capacity in the market and fluctuations in inventory levels… limited demand creating additional downward pressure on pricing.”
  • “We believe that more LED chip manufacturers will adopt the six-inch platform and that six-inch PSS should become the fastest growing subsegment of the LED substrate market.”
  • “We are on track to complete our LANCE crystal growth deliverables this year producing windows as large as 36” x 18” x 2”… We also expect to move SapphirEX into production later this year.”
  • “Paramount among our objectives this year is the drive to reduce the use of cash and become cash flow positive as soon as possible.”
  • “2016 and in particular the next six months are extremely important… as we move new technologies to production, reduce product costs and see how these potential new sapphire markets develop.”

Q&A Highlights

  • Polishing cost learnings: Despite the resource-sharing partner stepping back, Rubicon captured process insights to translate into six-inch polishing cost reductions; focus remains on six-inch .
  • Strategic options: Management emphasized that the next six months could materially change the situation if new applications materialize and optical initiatives progress; strategic review implied but contingent on developments .
  • Prior quarter context: In Q3, management flagged Q4 cash burn could be ~$5M due to inventory build and consignment; reiterated high cash usage short-term to enable Q1 sales conversion .

Estimates Context

  • Wall Street consensus for Q4 2015 EPS and revenue via S&P Global was unavailable during this analysis; therefore, vs-consensus comparisons could not be assessed. Management’s own Q4 guidance was met on revenue but missed on EPS as detailed above .
  • Q1 2016 guidance implies sequential revenue rebound ($4–$5M) and narrower loss (-$0.24 to -$0.28), which may prompt estimate revisions higher on revenue and lower on EPS loss if coverage exists .

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Revenue in Q4 2015 fell to $2.456M, consistent with deliberate limitation of low-priced core sales and consignment inventory build; expect sequential rebound with six-inch PSS draws in Q1 2016 .
  • EPS missed prior guidance due to severe pricing pressure and higher idle costs; non-GAAP EPS (-$0.38) benefited from excluding a $2.3M raw material revaluation and deferred tax estimate changes .
  • Structural advantage in six-inch PSS via vertical integration should matter as migration accelerates and four-inch pricing bottoms; expect PSS to drive near-term revenue mix .
  • Optical growth vectors are progressing (LANCE and SapphirEX), offering higher-margin diversification beyond volatile bulk sapphire; key 2016 milestones could be stock catalysts .
  • Cash position remains solid with $21.216M in cash and $8.895M in short-term investments at year-end; operating cash outflow increased in Q4 due to consignment and limited core sales, but management targets improvement as wafer costs fall .
  • Near-term trading: Watch for confirmation of Q1 revenue/EPS guidance and evidence of wafer cost reductions; any update on large new sapphire applications could materially shift sentiment .
  • Medium-term thesis: Execution on cost reductions, mix shift toward six-inch PSS and optical products, and potential adoption in new consumer/medical applications are pivotal to margin recovery and cash flow improvement .