RT
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (RCMT)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2024 revenue rose 8.3% year over year to $76.9M, but profitability was pressured: GAAP diluted EPS was $0.37 (vs. $0.65 YoY) and adjusted diluted EPS was $0.49 (vs. $0.73 YoY) .
- Results missed Wall Street consensus: revenue $76.9M vs. $79.0M*, adjusted EPS $0.49 vs. $0.83*, and adjusted EBITDA $6.3M vs. $10.0M*; management attributed the miss to discrete items in Engineering and elevated SG&A (medical plan and legal settlement) . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
- Segment mix: Specialty Health Care strength (school revenue $34.9M, +17% YoY) and Life Sciences gross margin at 40% offset unusually weak Engineering margins (19.7%) due to a canceled industrial order and aerospace rework (~$0.9M GP impact) .
- Operating cash flow in Q4 was -$1.6M; DSOs improved to 92 in Q4 with a target of <80 by end of FY2025; management expects low double‑digit adjusted EBITDA growth each quarter in 2025 and a normalized effective tax rate below ~27.5% .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Specialty Health Care growth and pipeline: school revenue rose to $34.9M in Q4 2024 (from $29.8M YoY), with deepening district partnerships and robust behavioral health demand; “we are witnessing a resumption of growth in hours” .
- Life Sciences, Data & Solutions margins and managed services: Q4 gross margin reached 40.0%; division exceeded gross profit and NOI targets and secured new managed service renewals .
- Engineering backlog and strategic positioning: Energy Services advancing U.S. grid modernization and European EPC awards; teaming agreement with major construction company and expanding German client base .
What Went Wrong
- Engineering margin compression: Q4 Engineering gross margin fell to 19.7% (27.0% YoY) driven by a mid‑project industrial order cancellation and aerospace technical publications rework, reducing Q4 gross profit by ~$0.9M .
- Elevated SG&A: abnormal self‑insured medical costs (
$1.25M above normal) and California wage class action settlement/legal fees ($0.45M) increased Q4 SG&A . - Tax rate headwind: FY2024 effective tax rate ~34% (abnormally high due to permanent differences and deferred tax adjustments), depressing GAAP EPS; management expects normalization below ~27.5% in FY2025 .
Financial Results
Quarterly Trend (oldest → newest)
YoY Comparison (Q4 2023 → Q4 2024)
Segment Breakdown (Q4 2024 vs. Q4 2023)
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Though our profitability in Q4 was a disappointment, there is a clear delineation of discrete items that materially impacted the quarter and are not indicative of earnings power.” – Bradley Vizi .
- “These 2 items caused an approximate $900,000 reduction in gross profit in Q4.” – Kevin Miller (on Engineering cancellation and aerospace rework) .
- “Our goal for DSOs is to get to under 80 by the end of fiscal 2025.” – Kevin Miller .
- “We strive to grow our adjusted EBITDA low double digits every quarter… if we don’t, then it’s a failed quarter.” – Kevin Miller .
- “It should be well below 30% [effective tax rate]… the midpoint of 26% to 29% is a pretty good guess.” – Kevin Miller .
Q&A Highlights
- Tax rate dynamics: FY2024 ETR ~34% driven by permanent differences/deferred tax true‑ups; expectation to normalize below ~27.5% in FY2025 .
- Engineering discrete impacts: ~$$0.9M gross profit reduction from a canceled process equipment order and aerospace technical publications rework; both lowered revenue and margins .
- Macro exposure: No direct impact from headline government IT reductions; potential future tailwind as workforce reductions overshoot and contractors back‑fill .
- 2025 cadence: Management reiterated low double‑digit adjusted EBITDA growth per quarter as a scorecard objective .
- Working capital clean‑up: Two large receivable balances (school ~$6M; LS/IT client ~$3.8M) were cleaned up in Q1 2025; DSOs targeted <80 by year‑end .
Estimates Context
- Q4 2024 vs. Consensus: Revenue $76.9M vs. $79.0M*; Adjusted EBITDA $6.3M vs. $10.0M*; Adjusted EPS $0.49 vs. $0.83* – significant miss, driven by Engineering discrete items and elevated SG&A . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
- Q3 2024 vs. Consensus: Revenue $60.4M vs. $60.4M*; Adjusted EPS $0.44 vs. $0.44* – in line . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
- Implications: Street models likely to lower near‑term Engineering margin assumptions and SG&A run‑rate, while maintaining 2025 recovery on normalized tax rate, DSOs improvement, and segment pipeline .
Q4 2024 Actual vs. Consensus
Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Q4 miss was largely event‑driven: canceled Engineering order and aerospace rework (~$0.9M GP impact) plus abnormal SG&A created an earnings air‑pocket; these are not indicative of steady‑state earnings power .
- Health Care momentum and margin stability provide a buffer: school revenue strength and 28–30% target margins underpin 2025 visibility as district penetration deepens .
- Engineering remains a multi‑year growth vector: grid modernization, data center demand, and EU EPC wins support backlog and margin normalization toward 24–28% range .
- 2025 scorecard: management committed to low double‑digit adjusted EBITDA growth each quarter, normalized ETR below ~27.5%, and DSOs <80 by year‑end—key checkpoints for monitoring execution and potential re‑rating .
- Working capital/cash flow: sequential improvement in DSOs and resolution of two large AR balances set up better cash conversion vs. Q4’s -$1.6M OCF; watch AR discipline and borrowing line usage ($35.0M in Q4) .
- Near‑term trading: expect estimate resets post‑Q4 miss; catalysts include May update, Engineering margin recovery, continued school ramp, and any MSA/managed services wins in Life Sciences/HCM .
- Medium‑term thesis: diversified services platform across Health Care, Engineering, and Life Sciences/HCM with improving mix and international traction; focus on execution against margin ranges, DSOs, and segment‑specific pipelines .