Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

RE

RING ENERGY, INC. (REI)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 2025 was operationally solid but optically messy: production landed above midpoint (20,789 Boe/d) with LOE at $10.73/Boe (below guidance), yet a $72.9M non‑cash ceiling test impairment drove a GAAP net loss of $(0.25) per diluted share; on an adjusted basis EPS was $0.06 and Adjusted EBITDA was $47.7M .
  • Versus S&P Global consensus, Ring delivered an adjusted/primary EPS beat (0.06 vs 0.04*), a revenue beat ($78.6M vs $76.9M*), and an in‑line/slight beat on Adjusted EBITDA ($47.7M vs $47.1M*) despite softer realized pricing ($41.10/Boe) . Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.
  • Cash discipline remained the anchor: Adjusted FCF was $13.9M; debt was reduced by $20M to $428M outstanding with total liquidity at $157.3M; leverage ticked to 2.10x LTM under the RBL covenant framework .
  • Guidance largely reaffirmed with a lower LOE outlook: FY25 capex midpoint maintained at $97M (range narrowed), and FY25 LOE midpoint lowered to $11.10/Boe; Q4 guidance implies stable volumes (19.1–20.7k Boe/d; 66% oil) and capex of $18–$28M .
  • Near‑term stock catalysts: discipline-led deleveraging and cost control (positive); GAAP loss from non‑cash impairment and higher G&A (q/q) could weigh; September CFO departure introduces modest leadership transition risk until a permanent CFO is named .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

  • What Went Well

    • Cost execution: LOE at $10.73/Boe beat even the recently lowered range; all‑in cash operating costs were $22.35/Boe; “ongoing efforts to reduce costs” cited by management .
    • Balance sheet progress: Paid down $20M on the revolver to $428M; liquidity improved to $157.3M; 24th consecutive quarter of positive cash generation (AFCF $13.9M) .
    • Operational delivery: Sales volumes of 20,789 Boe/d (64% oil) landed above guidance midpoint; five wells (4 Hz, 1 vertical) brought on in CBP at 100% WI .
  • What Went Wrong

    • Optics of a GAAP loss: $72.9M non‑cash full‑cost ceiling impairment flipped GAAP EPS to $(0.25), overshadowing otherwise steady operations .
    • Pricing headwinds: Realized $/Boe declined 4% q/q and 15% y/y to $41.10/Boe; NGL and gas realizations remained weak .
    • Higher overhead q/q: G&A rose to $8.1M ($4.26/Boe), up 14–16% from Q2 2025; management is targeting further G&A reductions over time .

Financial Results

MetricQ3 2024Q2 2025Q3 2025
Revenue ($MM)$89.2 $82.6 $78.6
GAAP Diluted EPS ($)$0.17 $0.10 $(0.25)
Adjusted EPS ($)$0.07 $0.05 $0.06
Adjusted EBITDA ($MM)$54.0 $51.5 $47.7
Average Sales (Boe/d)20,108 21,295 20,789
Oil Mix (%)66% 68% 64%
Realized $/Boe$48.24 $42.63 $41.10
LOE $/Boe$10.98 $10.45 $10.73
Adjusted Free Cash Flow ($MM)$1.9 $24.8 $13.9
Capex ($MM)$42.7 $16.8 $24.6

Estimate comparison (Q3 2025):

  • Revenue: $76.9M consensus* vs $78.6M actual → Beat .
  • Primary/Adjusted EPS: $0.04 consensus* vs $0.06 actual → Beat .
  • Adjusted EBITDA: $47.1M consensus* vs $47.7M actual → Slight beat .
    Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.

KPIs and balance sheet:

  • Liquidity: $157.3M (primarily revolver availability) .
  • Revolver borrowings: $428M (down $20M q/q) .
  • Leverage Ratio (LTM RBL definition): 2.10x vs 2.05x in Q2 2025 and 1.59x in Q3 2024 .

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Capital spending ($MM)FY 2025$97 midpoint; $87–$107 range $97 midpoint; $92–$102 range Maintained midpoint; narrowed range
LOE ($/Boe)FY 2025$12.00 midpoint (from earlier FY outlook) $10.95–$11.25; $11.10 midpoint Lowered
Total sales (Boe/d)FY 202519,800–20,400; 20,100 midpoint New FY range provided
Oil sales (Bo/d)FY 202513,100–13,500; 13,300 midpoint New FY range provided
LOE ($/Boe)Q4 2025$10.75–$11.75; $11.25 midpoint New
Capital spending ($MM)Q4 2025$18–$28; $23 midpoint New
Total sales (Boe/d)Q4 202519,100–20,700; 19,900 midpoint New
Oil sales (Bo/d)Q4 202512,700–13,600; 13,150 midpoint New

Note: Q2 2025 provided 2H’25 guidance; Q3 2025 introduced FY’25 and Q4’25 detail .

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q-2 and Q-1)Current Period (Q3 2025)Trend
Capital discipline & deleveragingCut capex by ~36–47% for 2H/FY; record AFCF in Q2; paid down debt ($12M in Q2) .AFCF $13.9M; additional $20M debt reduction; liquidity $157.3M .Strengthening
LOE/cost controlLOE $11.89/Boe in Q1; $10.45/Boe in Q2, below guidance; lowered LOE guidance for 2H .LOE $10.73/Boe; below the low end of the recently lowered range .Improving
Lime Rock (LRR) integrationClosed 3/31; first full quarter in Q2; assets outperforming, low decline .Drilled/completed 5 CBP wells; continued operational integration .On track
Commodity prices/hedgingHedged ~1.3MM bbl 2H25; ~2.3MM bbl 2026 floors; protected gas .~0.6MM bbl hedged for Q4’25 at ~$62 floors; gas hedges in place .Risk‑managed
Impairment/ceiling testNo impairments in Q1/Q2 .$72.9M non‑cash impairment due to lower 12‑mo avg pricing .New headwind
LeadershipStable through Q2 .CFO resigned; Interim CFO appointed (Rocky Kwon) .Transition

Management Commentary

  • “Ring Energy again maintained strong cash generation and superior capital and operational discipline despite the significant headwinds of volatile commodity prices… We applied these savings to debt reduction, paying down $20 million of debt… liquidity… $157.3 million” — Paul D. McKinney, CEO .
  • “Our focus remains centered on maximizing free cash flow generation through continued capital discipline and improvements in capital efficiency, reducing operating costs and G&A, and applying these benefits to further debt reduction.” — Paul D. McKinney .
  • Q2 perspective for context: “Reduced capital expenditures by 48% over the previous quarter… generated a record of $24.8 million in Adjusted Free Cash Flow for the quarter” — Paul D. McKinney .

Q&A Highlights

  • A transcript was not available in the document set. The company hosted its Q3 call on Nov 7, 2025; guidance clarifications and operational updates are reflected in the press release and 8‑K exhibits .

Estimates Context

  • Consensus (S&P Global) coverage remains thin (EPS: 1 estimate; revenue: 2): Q3 2025 Primary EPS 0.04* vs 0.06 actual (Adjusted EPS) → Beat; revenue $76.9M* vs $78.6M (8‑K) → Beat; Adjusted EBITDA $47.1M* vs $47.7M → Slight beat . Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.
  • With realized pricing down q/q and volumes slightly below Q2 record levels, the beat hinged on cost control (LOE) and disciplined capex .

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Cash discipline and cost execution continue to offset pricing pressure; LOE beat and narrowed FY25 capex range support FCF durability through Q4 .
  • Adjusted results topped consensus despite a GAAP loss from a non‑cash impairment; investors should focus on normalized earnings/FCF versus GAAP optics in a volatile price tape .
  • Deleveraging pace improved ($20M q/q); liquidity at $157.3M offers flexibility heading into Q4 and 2026 plan framing .
  • LRR integration remains accretive; continued CBP development at 100% WI underscores operational control and inventory depth .
  • Watch items: elevated G&A vs Q2, realized price softness, and leadership transition (Interim CFO) until a permanent appointment is made .
  • Hedges provide downside protection into Q4 and 2026, moderating cash flow volatility .
  • Near‑term setup: stable Q4 volumes, lower LOE, and tight capex should keep FCF positive; further debt reduction is a likely management priority and potential stock catalyst .

Supporting Detail: Estimates vs Actuals (Q3 2025)

MetricConsensus# of Est.ActualResult
Revenue ($MM)76.9*2*$78.6 Beat
Primary/Adj. EPS ($)0.04*1*0.06 (Adj. EPS) Beat
Adjusted EBITDA ($MM)47.1*$47.7 Slight beat

Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.

Additional Data Points

  • Select expenses (Q3 2025): G&A $8.1M ($4.26/Boe); interest expense $10.1M; realized derivative gain $2.5M; unrealized derivative loss $(2.1)M .
  • Hedge summary (as of 9/30/25): ~0.6MM bbl oil hedged for Q4 at avg downside $62.08; ~0.6 Bcf gas hedged at $3.27; 2026 oil swaps/collars provide additional floors .

Citations: All company figures are from Ring Energy’s Q3 2025 8‑K and press release exhibits unless noted. S&P Global consensus values are marked with an asterisk and were retrieved via S&P Global.