RE
Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. (REPX)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2024 was operationally solid with record volumes and disciplined spending, but headline EPS fell sequentially on hedge losses and higher G&A; oil production rose 3% q/q to 15.9 MBbl/d and total volumes reached 25.0 MBoe/d, Adjusted EBITDAX was $69M (66% margin) and Total FCF was $18M .
- The company introduced 2025 guidance with total production of 24.6–25.6 MBoe/d (oil 15.8–16.3 MBbl/d) and $170–210M total capex (plus $18–22M Power JV), reflecting a pivot to New Mexico development and the start of a $60–80M midstream build in 2025 .
- Strategic midstream inflection: REPX signed a long-term gas purchase agreement and approved ~20-inch, 150 MMcfd pipeline with ~$130M total midstream capex through 2026 to secure flow assurance and optional third-party revenues; initial compression is targeted in-service March 2025 and full pipeline completion before end of 2026 .
- Capital allocation remains balanced: $90M debt reduction in 2024 to 1.0x leverage; dividend raised to $0.38/sh and 45% of LTM Total FCF returned via dividends; credit facility extended to Dec 2028 and borrowing base increased to $400M .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Efficiency/volume execution: Q4 oil volumes +3% q/q to 15.9 MBbl/d; total 25.0 MBoe/d; Adjusted EBITDAX $69M; CFFO before WC $51M; LOE $8.54/boe within prior guidance .
- Strategic infrastructure: Signed gas purchase agreement; sanctioned high-pressure line (150 MMcfd) to access multiple processing plants; Board approved ~$130M midstream capex; near-term compression in-service March 2025 .
- Management tone on capital efficiency: “Our actual performance materially exceeded these goals, with oil production growth of 15% and total production growth of 22%, combined with a reduction in upstream cash capital expenditures of 27%.” — CEO Bobby Riley .
What Went Wrong
- EPS and hedge headwinds: Q4 diluted EPS fell to $0.52 vs $1.21 in Q3, driven by an $8.4M loss on derivatives (including $11M non-cash) and higher cash G&A ($3.77/boe) due to severance .
- Realized pricing pressure: Average realized oil price declined q/q to $68.50/bbl; gas and NGL realizations remained very weak (gas $0.02/mcf; NGL $5.18/bbl) despite increased gas capture .
- Capex cadence/back-half weighting: 2025 upstream capex and well turn-in-lines are back-half weighted (45% of net operated wells online in Q4), creating intra-year capital timing vs production recognition risk; midstream timing can affect Q4 2025 turn-in-lines .
Financial Results
Core P&L and Cash Flow (chronological: oldest → newest)
Note: S&P Global consensus data was unavailable at query time due to provider rate limits; we could not retrieve Q4 2024 Street estimates for REPX.
Operating KPIs and Realizations (chronological: oldest → newest)
Additional notes: Q4 derivative loss $8.4M (incl. $11M non-cash) and realized settlements +$3M; production and ad valorem taxes $8M (≈8% of revenue) .
Guidance Changes
Q4 2024 Guidance vs Actual (accuracy check)
2025 Guidance (new disclosure)
Dividend: Company paid $0.38/sh in Q4 and paid $1.46/sh in 2024; history of raising fixed dividend (current $0.38) .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We had an exceptional year by all measures… oil production growth of 15% and total production growth of 22%… reduction in upstream cash capital expenditures of 27%.” — CEO Bobby Riley .
- “In 2025, we will… shift increased development activity to New Mexico… advance our New Mexico gas midstream project… provide greater flow assurance for long-term growth.” — CEO Bobby Riley .
- “We decreased our cost per foot across both Texas and New Mexico assets by 11% year-over-year in 2024… increased our lateral feet drilled per day by 20% since 2023.” — COO John Suter .
- “We’re showing a range of total full-year production growth of 9% to 14% with oil up 5% to 8%… upstream capex increasing… development being back-end weighted… 45% of net operated wells online in Q4.” — CFO Philip Riley .
- “If gas basis in the Permian stays materially negative, then we have lower-cost feedstock for power generation… we might realize an effective gas price of roughly $1 to $2, which could correspond to $10–$20 million of revenue.” — CFO Philip Riley .
Q&A Highlights
- Power/merchant project timing and scope: All thermal generation procured; multiple interconnection agreements secured; construction expected to start next quarter; target 4Q25 COD with possible slip into early 2026; battery optionality under evaluation given tariff/economic volatility .
- Build-vs-buy midstream rationale: Limited third-party solutions and NM permitting challenges; company-controlled 56-mile high-pressure line to access ~12 processing plants; long-term flow assurance and potential third-party volumes .
- Working interest implications: ~100 net/200 gross locations implies ~50–60% working interest; midstream fees expected at market rates on non-owned working interest volumes, creating incremental revenue even without third-party producers .
- 2025 cadence dependency on midstream: NM 2025 production is back-half weighted; midstream timing could push some turn-in-lines to 1Q26; will prioritize routing through owned system to capture fees .
- Cost/service environment: Drilling environment neutral-to-better; stimulation availability improved; 2025 well costs modeled slightly higher due to fixed facility spend despite D&C efficiencies .
Estimates Context
- We attempted to retrieve S&P Global (Capital IQ) consensus for Q4 2024 revenue, EPS, and EBITDA, but the provider rate limit prevented access at this time. As a result, we cannot compare reported results to Street consensus in this recap. If needed, we can refresh and add the beats/misses upon the next successful retrieval.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Volume growth with cost discipline: Record Q4 volumes and steady LOE point to continued operational excellence; sequential EPS softness tied to hedges and one-time G&A items rather than core operations .
- 2025 is a build year for infrastructure: Expect more capex in back half and potential timing mismatch between spend and production recognition; midstream schedule is the swing factor for New Mexico turn-in-lines .
- Midstream optionality could unlock incremental value: Owned pipeline/gathering enables flow assurance and fee capture on non-owned working interest and potential third-party volumes; revenue uplift potential into 2026 .
- Power JV as a structural hedge: Merchant ERCOT exposure provides an outlet for low-basis Permian gas; management frames a $10–$20M annual revenue potential depending on gas prices/basis dynamics .
- Balance sheet strength supports the plan: Leverage ~1.0x, extended revolver maturity to 2028 and $400M borrowing base provide flexibility to fund midstream and power build-out while maintaining dividends .
- 2024 guidance execution was strong: Volumes beat Q4 guidance, LOE was in-range, and interest expense in-range; G&A variance was tied to non-recurring severance .
- Catalysts: Midstream construction milestones, ERCOT project updates/PPAs, New Mexico well results and D&C cost trajectory, and any monetization/third-party midstream contracting could drive sentiment .
Appendix: Additional Data Points
- Q4 2024 Selected Operating and Financial Data (company disclosure includes oil & gas sales $102.7M, Adjusted EBITDAX $69.1M, CFFO $66.4M, Total FCF $17.7M; oil 1,464 MBbl; gas 2,305 MMcf; NGL 455 MBbl; total 2,303 MBoe) .
- Hedging program: Forward-12-month hedge levels ~50% oil and 63% gas; oil collars floors ~$66 and ceilings ~$74; HH collars ~$3.49 x $3.77 .
- Debt summary at YE 2024: Credit facility $115M outstanding (SOFR + margin), Sr. Notes $165M at 10.5%, ~88% fixed/hedged through 1Q26 .
Sources: Q4 2024 8-K/press release and exhibits ; earnings call transcript (prepared remarks and Q&A) -; prior quarter press releases for trend analysis - -; credit facility extension (Dec 2024) .