RPC INC (RES)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 delivered stable topline and improved profitability: revenue $332.9M (-1% q/q, -11.9% y/y), diluted EPS $0.06 (flat q/q, down y/y), and EBITDA $48.9M with margin expansion to 14.7% (+100 bps q/q) on lower costs despite competitive pricing in pressure pumping .
- Results beat S&P Global consensus: EPS $0.06 vs $0.049* and revenue $332.9M vs $326.7M*, driven by cost discipline (lower insurance, transportation/fuel, and materials) and a favorable mix; EPS was held back by a normalized tax rate (27.2%) versus Q4’s unusually low rate .
Values retrieved from S&P Global. - RPC closed the $245M Pintail Completions acquisition on April 1; management expects 2025 EPS and cash flow accretion. Pintail did ~$409M 2024 revenue with ~20% EBITDA margins, adding scale in Permian wireline and shifting mix toward lower-capex, higher FCF services .
- Capital allocation remains conservative: $326.7M cash and no debt at quarter-end; dividend maintained at $0.04/share; 2025 capex framework raised/incremented post-deal to $165–$215M for the next nine months (was $150–$200M for 2025) as the company prioritizes maintenance and returns on capital in an uncertain macro/tariff backdrop .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- EBITDA increased 6% q/q to $48.9M; margin up 100 bps to 14.7% on lower insurance, transportation/fuel (less customer-furnished fuel), and materials/supplies costs, despite flat pressure pumping revenue .
- Rental tools grew with seasonal pickup; Support Services operating income +3% q/q; Technical Services operating income +32% q/q on cost actions .
- Strategic M&A: Pintail adds >$400M revenue, ~20% EBITDA margin, ~30+ fleets, and Tier 1 E&P customer base in Permian; expected to be accretive in 2025. “We are excited for our combined prospects to bring world-class well completion services to our customers” — CEO Ben Palmer .
-
What Went Wrong
- Pricing pressure persists in pressure pumping; Tier 2 diesel demand remains soft, with spot/semi-dedicated markets oversupplied and highly competitive .
- SG&A rose to $42.5M (12.8% of revenue) due to IT implementation and slightly lower revenue; normalized tax rate (27.2%) reduced net income vs Q4 .
- YoY declines: revenue (-11.9%), EPS ($0.06 vs $0.13), EBITDA ($48.9M vs $63.1M) and EBITDA margin (14.7% vs 16.7%) reflecting a tougher OFS environment .
Financial Results
- Consolidated performance vs prior year, prior quarter, and margins
- Actuals vs S&P Global consensus (Q1 2025)
Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Segment performance
- KPIs and balance sheet/cash flow
Guidance Changes
Modeling notes: ~$170M cash used, $50M seller note at SOFR+200 bps, ~$25M restricted stock (~4.5M shares), Pintail CapEx up to ~$20M annualized; depreciation to approximate annualized capex .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategic direction: “Pintail’s strong Permian operations are driven by a blue chip customer base and a highly regarded management team. We are excited for our combined prospects… and continue to build RPC’s diversified oilfield services model.” — Ben Palmer .
- Market conditions: “The oilfield services market remains challenged… We continue to see intense competition to keep assets utilized” .
- Macro stance: “We’ve entered a period of high uncertainty and limited visibility with respect to tariffs… Oil at these prices makes it difficult for some customers to justify continued completion activities.” — Ben Palmer .
- Capital allocation: “We are balancing the pricing and utilization strategy… not performing work at levels that generate inadequate returns.” — Ben Palmer .
Q&A Highlights
- Pricing/utilization: Oversupplied frac capacity keeps pricing highly competitive; RPC prioritizes returns, with stronger utilization/visibility in Tier 4 DGB fleets vs weaker Tier 2 diesel .
- M&A priorities: Accretive deals that add scale, strong brands, blue-chip E&P exposure, and high FCF characteristics; growth beyond pressure pumping into less capital-intensive lines .
- Pintail modeling: ~$409M 2024 revenue; quarterly cadence ~“around $100M”; EBITDA margin “about 20%, plus or minus a few points”; light integration; back-office focus .
- Capex cadence: Q1 capex in low $30M by timing; 2025 capex to pick up as needed; bias to maintenance and returns, preserving cash for potential M&A .
- Gas basins: Early indications; downhole tools best positioned to capture gas-led uptick; less immediate for pressure pumping .
Estimates Context
-
Q1 2025 vs S&P Global consensus: Revenue $332.9M vs $326.7M*; EPS $0.06 vs $0.049* — both beats; 4 revenue estimates and 5 EPS estimates underpin consensus*. Management noted normalized tax rate impacted EPS q/q .
Values retrieved from S&P Global. -
Implications: Consensus may need to reflect better cost control and mix supporting EBITDA margin resilience, offset by persistent pricing pressure and macro uncertainty; Pintail’s ~20% EBITDA margin profile could lift consolidated mix in coming quarters if activity holds .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Quality beat on both revenue and EPS vs consensus amid a difficult pricing backdrop; EBITDA margin expanded on cost discipline — constructive for near-term sentiment *. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Pintail adds scale, margin, FCF, and a deeper Permian footprint with blue-chip E&Ps; accretive to 2025 EPS/CF and shifts mix toward lower-capex wireline .
- Pressure pumping remains highly competitive and oversupplied; Tier 4 assets hold better visibility while Tier 2 demand lags — pricing remains the key risk .
- Capex outlook nudged higher post-deal and focused on maintenance; balance sheet remains strong (no debt, $326.7M cash), supporting optionality for additional M&A and a steady dividend .
- Watch for gas-led activity improvement benefiting downhole tools; near-term macro/tariff uncertainty can weigh on customer completion decisions and pricing traction .
- Pro forma mix shift: management cited wireline at 23% and Permian at ~60% of revenue (pro forma ‘24), improving customer quality/visibility — supportive for medium-term margin stability .
- Near-term trading lens: stock likely to key off cost execution vs pricing pressure, Pintail integration/trajectory, and any signs of gas basin uptick; estimate revisions may drift modestly higher on margin resilience and Pintail accretion .