Sign in

Janice M. Hamilton

Chief Financial Officer at RYAN SPECIALTY HOLDINGS
Executive

About Janice M. Hamilton

Janice M. Hamilton, age 43, is Chief Financial Officer of Ryan Specialty, appointed effective October 1, 2024 after serving as Chief Accounting Officer (2021–2024) and Controller (2018–2021). She is a licensed CPA (Illinois) with a B.S. in Finance (Miami University) and M.S. in Accounting (University of Virginia), and previously held senior finance roles in London at AmTrust International, ANV Holdings, and Jubilee Group Holdings . Company performance context during her tenure: 2024 Organic Revenue Growth was 12.1% and Adjusted EBITDAC Margin was 31.5%; the company reports six consecutive years of >20% topline revenue growth and 14 years of double‑digit organic growth, and TSR outperformed peers over the presented period with a 136% increase .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Ryan SpecialtyController2018–2021Led controllership during scaling, post-IPO readiness and consolidation
Ryan SpecialtyChief Accounting Officer2021–2024Oversaw reporting, controls, and accounting policy through high growth and M&A
Ryan SpecialtyChief Financial OfficerOct 2024–PresentTransitioned into CFO as part of the 2024 succession plan

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
AmTrust International (non-U.S. & Lloyd’s operations)CFO2016–2018Led international finance and Lloyd’s market operations
ANV Holdings BVCFO2014–2016Drove finance through acquisition by AmTrust
Jubilee Group Holdings (prior Ryan Specialty subsidiary)Controller → Finance DirectorPre‑2014Built finance foundation ahead of subsequent corporate transactions

Fixed Compensation

MetricFY 2024FY 2025
Base Salary ($)$600,000 $600,000 (no increase)
Target Bonus (%)150% 200% (raised for CFO role)
Actual Bonus Paid ($)$850,005

Performance Compensation

Short‑Term Incentive (STI) framework and 2024 outcomes

Note: Ms. Hamilton’s 2024 STI was under a legacy discretionary plan but was set at 94.4% of target; she participates in the Executive Incentive Corporate Plan starting 2025 .

MetricWeightTarget ScaleActual 2024Payout vs TargetVesting/Timing
Organic Revenue Growth35% 10–12% → 100%; >16% → 150% 12.1% 101.7% Paid early 2025
Adjusted EBITDAC Margin35% 31.00–31.25% → 100%; >31.75% → 150% 31.5% (at target accruals) 120.3% Paid early 2025
Individual Merit30% Committee‑assessed (culture/results/client centricity/teamwork/inclusion) Committee outcome55.8% (for Corporate Plan NEOs) Paid early 2025
Ms. Hamilton’s STI determinationLegacy discretionary plan94.4% of target Paid early 2025 ($850,005)

Long‑Term Incentives (LTI) granted and vesting economics

Award TypeGrant DateQuantityGrant Date Fair Value ($)Performance ConditionsVesting
PSUs (Class A)Nov 4, 2024Threshold 47,456; Target 63,275; Max 94,913 $2,756,259 Must meet (i) Adjusted EBITDAC Margin Target by 2027 and maintained through 2028; (ii) 4‑yr Organic Revenue Growth CAGR (2024–2027); plus stock price CAGR governs payout at 75%/100%/150% at threshold/target/max Cliff certification/vesting on Apr 1, 2029, subject to service through Jan 1, 2029
Staking RLUs (LLC Common Units)Pre‑IPO/IPO conversionSchedule: 5,821 units vest each July 22, 2025–2030; 17,463 vest July 22, 2031 Market value tracked at period endTime‑based Annual installments per schedule
2022 RLUs (LLC Common Units)Mar 18, 2022458 remaining at 12/31/24 $29,385 market value at 12/31/24 Time‑based (recognition of 2021 performance) Vested in equal installments Apr 1, 2023/2024/2025

LTI termination/change‑in‑control treatment highlights: For PSUs/PLUs, if terminated without Cause they remain eligible to vest pro‑rata at certification; upon death or disability, vest based on actual/assumed performance; under CIC qualifying termination, time‑based awards fully accelerate and performance awards follow award terms .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

Ownership DetailValue
Beneficial ownership (Class A shares)4,442
Beneficial ownership (Class B shares)142,284
Ownership as % outstanding<1% of Class A; <1% of Class B
Options/Class C Units (Exercisable / Unexercisable; Exercise Price)9,439 / 18,879; $23.34
Stock awards not vested (RLUs)52,389 units; market value $3,361,278 at 12/31/24
Equity incentive awards not vested (PSUs max reference)94,913; payout value reference $6,089,618 at 12/31/24 (max scenario, price $64.16)
Stock ownership guidelines (CFO multiple; compliance date)4× base salary; compliance by Oct 1, 2029; all executive officers currently in compliance
Hedging/PledgingProhibited absent explicit approval per Insider Trading Policy
ClawbackNYSE‑compliant policy requiring recovery of erroneously awarded incentive comp after restatements

Employment Terms

ProvisionNon‑CIC Qualifying TerminationCIC Qualifying TerminationNotes
Cash Severance1.0× base salary + target bonus 2.0× base salary + target bonus CFO treated as “other NEO”
Pro‑rata BonusBased on actual performance, paid at end of period Pro‑rated at target, lump sum
EquityPer award terms (next tranche for certain RSUs/RLUs/Class C Units; PSUs/PLUs pro‑rata eligibility) Time‑based awards accelerate; PSUs/PLUs per terms
Benefits Continuation12 months for CFO 24 months
Restrictive Covenants12‑month non‑compete/non‑solicit 24‑month non‑compete/non‑solicit
Potential Payments (illustrative at 12/31/24)Total $5,754,308 Total $14,213,851 Death/Disability total $9,480,282
Tax Gross‑upsNone (policy) None

Performance & Track Record

  • 2024 STI outcomes across the plan were driven by 12.1% Organic Revenue Growth (101.7% payout) and 31.5% Adjusted EBITDAC Margin (120.3% payout); Hamilton’s 2024 bonus was set at 94.4% of target under a legacy plan and moves to the performance plan in 2025 with a 200% target .
  • Company TSR rose 136% over the presented period and the firm cites six years of >20% topline revenue growth and 14 consecutive years of double‑digit organic growth, underscoring alignment between equity awards tied to margin, organic growth, and stock price CAGR .

Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Mix shift to performance: PSUs granted in November 2024 add multi‑metric hurdles (margin, organic growth CAGR, stock price CAGR) and cliff vesting in 2029, increasing pay‑for‑performance and retention .
  • Ownership alignment: 4× salary ownership guideline and anti‑hedging/pledging, combined with long vesting schedules (RLUs annually through 2031; PSUs in 2029), support long‑term alignment and reduce near‑term selling pressure .
  • Governance protections: Robust clawback policy, no excise tax gross‑ups, and compensation committee oversight with independent consultant (FW Cook) .

Risk Indicators & Red Flags

  • Change‑in‑control severance at 2.0× salary+bonus for all NEOs and full acceleration of time‑based equity could create payout concentration in a sale; performance award treatment remains tied to metrics, mitigating windfalls .
  • Insider trading policy bans pledging/hedging absent approval; no pledging disclosures for Hamilton; stock awards vesting cadence implies ongoing Form 4 activity but guidelines require holding until compliance, dampening forced sales .

Equity Vesting Schedule Highlights (Selling Pressure View)

  • RLUs: 5,821 units vest each July 22, 2025–2030; 17,463 vest July 22, 2031, creating annual taxable events and potential liquidity needs but mitigated by holding requirements to meet the 4× salary guideline .
  • PSUs: Single cliff on Apr 1, 2029 with 75–150% payout band tied to stock price CAGR, contingent on margin and organic growth floors—aligning realized value to multi‑year execution and TSR .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment and retention: Multi‑metric PSUs with 2029 cliff, annual RLU vesting through 2031, and ownership/anti‑pledging policies point to strong retention and alignment; near‑term selling pressure is limited by guidelines and policy constraints .
  • Pay‑for‑performance ramp: Raising CFO bonus target to 200% for 2025 and embedding organic growth and margin in STI, plus PSUs tied to TSR/margin/growth, increases sensitivity of realized pay to financial execution and stock performance .
  • Transaction dynamics: CIC terms (2× cash; equity acceleration of time‑based awards) are standard but meaningful; performance award treatment remains metrics‑based—important for assessing potential deal‑related payout optics .