SA
Science Applications International Corp (SAIC)·Q1 2026 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- SAIC delivered Q1 FY26 revenue of $1.88B (+2% YoY) with adjusted EBITDA margin of 8.4%; revenue was a modest beat vs consensus, but EPS and EBITDA came in below expectations as mix and fixed‑price space program costs weighed on margins . Revenue estimate: $1.867B*, actual: $1.877B; EPS estimate: $2.12*, actual (adjusted): $1.92; EBITDA estimate: $172.2M*, actual: $157.0M. The company reaffirmed FY26 guidance at quarter-end . Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Bookings were strong: $2.4B net bookings (book-to-bill 1.3), with total backlog rising to ~$22.3B; Civilian segment grew 8% YoY with margin expansion, offset by Defense & Intelligence margin compression .
- Free cash flow was $(44)M, impacted by MARPA facility usage and receivables timing; management reiterated FY26 free cash flow guidance of $510–$530M and declared a $0.37 quarterly dividend .
- Management emphasized procurement delays and mix effects as margin headwinds; execution initiatives and favorable option extensions on a fixed-price space program support margin improvement starting in Q2 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
- What Went Well
- “Net bookings of $2.4 billion; book-to-bill 1.3” sustained pipeline health, with notable Army S3I ($1.8B) and PBGC ($327M) awards; backlog rose to $22.3B .
- Civilian revenue +8% YoY (to $444M) with operating margin up to 9.0% and adjusted margin to 11.7%—driven by ramp on existing and new contracts .
- CEO on strategic alignment: “Rapid evolution of new technologies... and elevated global threat environment create significant opportunities... SAIC is prepared and well aligned... to drive value” .
- What Went Wrong
- Adjusted EBITDA margin declined to 8.4% (from 9.0% YoY) and GAAP operating margin to 6.4% (from 7.1%), primarily due to timing and volume mix; diluted EPS fell to $1.42 from $1.48 YoY .
- Free cash flow of $(44)M driven by MARPA facility usage and receivables timing; CFO flagged seasonality and slower collections on two programs as near-term FCF headwinds .
- Fixed-price space program cost overrun (SDA) impacted Q1 margins; management expects improvement as the program transitions into sustainment with option extensions .
Financial Results
Segment breakdown (YoY comparison):
KPIs and balance sheet/cash:
Guidance Changes
Note: Q2 FY26 later revised FY26 guidance to revenue $7.25–$7.325B, adjusted EBITDA $680–$690M, adjusted EPS $9.40–$9.60, FCF >$550M, margin 9.3%–9.5% . This was subsequent to Q1.
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “Our performance in the first quarter reflects the steady progress we are making against our enterprise growth strategy… an elevated global threat environment create significant opportunities for SAIC” .
- CEO on macro/customer dynamics: “Operating environment has stabilized… higher rates of turnover among our customers… procurement delays… budget request supportive of our growth strategy” .
- CFO: FY26 guide assumes H1 growth 1–3% and H2 2–4%; focused on delivering 9.4%–9.6% adjusted EBITDA margin and $11/share FCF, repurchasing $350–$400M annually .
Q&A Highlights
- Procurement competitiveness and award timing: Management noted delays, “best value” remains procurement focus, not LPTA; new awards subsequent to quarter close exceeded $2B, though protests may delay bookings .
- Fixed‑price space program: ~$3–$5M margin impact in Q1; transitioning into sustainment with option extensions; EAC captures remaining risk and margin expected to improve from Q2 .
- Recompete headwinds: NASA losses lap out by end of Q3; Cloud One no‑bid headwind stabilizes through FY; Vanguard extended; overall recompete win rates targeted in high 80s–90% .
- On‑contract growth cadence: Q1 FCF negative due to receivables timing; management expects improvement, emphasizes on‑contract growth as near-term lever .
- Civilian margin trajectory: Civilian margins expanding (up ~30–40 bps YoY in Q1), expected to continue; D&I margins to grind higher via bid discipline and execution .
Estimates Context
Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Implication: Modest revenue beat but EPS/EBITDA miss reflect margin pressure from timing/mix and fixed‑price program costs; estimate revisions likely to modestly trim near-term margin assumptions while maintaining bookings/backlog strength .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Q1 was operationally solid on bookings and Civilian growth; margin pressure and FCF timing drove misses despite a revenue beat—watch for Q2 margin normalization as the fixed‑price space program moves to sustainment .
- Guidance was reaffirmed at Q1, underpinned by robust backlog and pipeline; subsequent Q2 revision lowered revenue/EBITDA but raised EPS/FCF on tax and cost actions—model sensitivity to award timing remains elevated .
- Segment divergence continues: Civilian is the growth/margin bright spot; D&I margins compressed—bid discipline and execution expected to grind margins higher over time .
- Capital returns remain supportive: $125M repurchases in Q1 and $0.37 dividend; FY26 buybacks targeted at $350–$400M—providing downside cushion amid revenue volatility .
- Bookings strength (1.3x B2B) and expanding award wins (Army S3I, Treasury cloud, SDA) bolster medium‑term growth visibility; conversion delays are the gating factor for near-term top line .
- Risk monitor: Procurement/personnel turnover and CR dynamics can push ramps to the right; management’s cost efficiency and AI-enabled operating model aim to protect margins and cash if revenue compresses .
- Tactical positioning: Near-term, focus on margin recovery and cash flow trajectory; medium-term, thesis centers on asset-light mission integration, enterprise IT, and outcome-based contracts supporting margin accretion and sustainable growth .