EC
EchoStar CORP (SATS)·Q2 2016 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Revenue declined 4.5% year-over-year to $757.6M while diluted EPS rose to $0.60 (vs $0.36 YoY), and EBITDA increased 3.9% to $220.6M, reflecting stronger Hughes consumer mix offset by ETC/ESS pressure .
- Hughes posted modest growth (revenue +1.2% YoY; EBITDA +2.9%), ended Q2 with 1,030,000 broadband subscribers, and expanded enterprise backlog to ~$1.5B (+28% YoY) .
- ESS revenue fell to $101M (vs $125M YoY) and EBITDA to $84M (vs $104M YoY), driven by DISH lease terminations (EchoStar I/VIII) in Q4’15; ETC EBITDA fell on lower equipment sales and SAGE marketing spend; SAGE was discontinued, with related charges expected in Q3 .
- Balance sheet remained strong with ~$1.51B cash and marketable investment securities at Q2, followed by July notes offerings of $750M secured and $750M unsecured due 2026; management emphasized capacity relief and growth as EchoStar XIX (Jupiter 2) enters service in Q1’17 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Hughes delivered Q2 revenue of $339M (+1.2% YoY) and EBITDA of $106M (+2.9% YoY), supported by higher consumer services and domestic enterprise equipment/services; management highlighted progress on EchoStar XIX and Brazil launch .
- Subscriber base remained above 1M (1,030,000), with enterprise order backlog reaching ~$1.5B (+28% YoY), positioning for growth as capacity expands in 2017 .
- Net income and EPS improved materially: net income attributable to EchoStar rose to $55.8M (vs $31.8M YoY); diluted EPS reached $0.60 (vs $0.36) on higher EBITDA, lower depreciation, and lower interest expense .
Management quotes:
- “I’m very pleased with our performance in Q2 and we are well positioned for growth going forward.” — Pradman Kaul .
- “In closing, I am honestly very pleased with the progress we have made in Q2 on our numerous strategic initiatives while also delivering solid results in the quarter.” — Mike Dugan .
What Went Wrong
- ESS revenue declined to $101M (vs $125M YoY) and EBITDA to $84M (vs $104M YoY) due to DISH lease terminations; launch timing shifts (Proton off-nominal conditions) pushed EchoStar XXI to Oct/Nov’16 .
- ETC EBITDA fell to $20M (vs $29M YoY) on lower equipment sales to DISH and increased marketing spend; SAGE was discontinued with expected charges in Q3’16 .
- Capacity constraints led to approximately 8,200 net subscriber losses in Q2, largely in wholesale channels; G&A increased from a bad debt reserve tied to a large international customer bankruptcy .
Financial Results
Consolidated trends (oldest → newest)
Q2 year-over-year and estimates context
Note: Wall Street consensus via S&P Global was unavailable due to access limits; no beat/miss determination can be made.
Segment breakdown (Q2 2015 vs Q2 2016)
KPIs and cash
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Echo 19 Jupiter 2 satellite construction is substantially complete… scheduled for launch in the fourth quarter of this year and we expect to place the satellite into service in Q1 of 2017.” — Pradman Kaul .
- “ESS revenue for the second quarter was $101 million… EBITDA… $84 million… launch date for Echostar XXI will likely move to October or November of 2016.” — Anders Johnson .
- “Capital expenditures for the quarter were $142 million… we expect full year 2016 spending… in the low 800s… Free cash flow… $79 million for Q2 2016.” — Dave Rayner .
- “We have decided to discontinue the SAGE home automation and security products…” — Mike Dugan .
Q&A Highlights
- Equipment sales outlook: ETC set-top demand expected to remain “sluggish” with DISH subscriber declines; Hopper 3 initial shipments affected quarter-to-quarter dynamics .
- Bad debt reserve: Tied to a large international customer bankruptcy; reserve deemed reasonable but subject to adjustment as proceedings evolve .
- Capacity-driven sub trends: Wholesale channels drove Q2 losses; management does not expect growth to resume until EchoStar XIX enters service; note one-quarter lag between satellite launch and service .
- EU MSS/CGC: XXI delay still allows minimal service by year-end; ongoing work toward EU-wide CGC harmonization .
- CapEx trajectory: 2017 CapEx “sub-$400M” with maintenance near ~$300M; 2016 in the low $800Ms .
- Strategic capital: Raised $1.5B in July; management evaluating satellite projects and opportunities, emphasizing de-risking financing .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus estimates (revenue, EPS, EBITDA) for Q2 2016 via S&P Global were unavailable due to access limitations; therefore, a beat/miss assessment versus consensus cannot be provided.
- Company furnished preliminary HSSC ranges for Q2: revenue $432–$450M and EBITDA $190–$200M (non-GAAP), with subscribers ~1,030,000 at quarter-end; these are divisional estimates, not consolidated consensus benchmarks .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term: Expect constrained subscriber growth until EchoStar XIX capacity comes online in Q1’17; Hughes margins continue to benefit from consumer mix and lower SAC; watch for Q3 SAGE-related charges and launch execution for XXI/XXIII/105 .
- Medium-term: Capacity additions (XIX, 105/SES-11) and Brazil rollout should reaccelerate consumer growth and open aeronautical Ka opportunities; enterprise backlog supports visibility .
- Segment mix: Hughes strength offsets ETC/ESS headwinds; ESS should stabilize as fleet additions enter service in early 2017; ETC tied to DISH demand trajectory .
- Capital discipline: 2017 CapEx step-down to sub-$400M improves FCF profile post-launch cycle; maintenance CapEx ~$300M baseline supports deleveraging or reinvestment optionality .
- Balance sheet/financing: ~$1.51B liquidity at Q2 plus July $1.5B notes adds flexibility to pursue satellite and strategic initiatives; management focused on de-risking financing .
- Regulatory: EU MSS/CGC milestones remain a priority; harmonization would broaden EchoStar Mobile potential; monitor Brexit-related regulatory shifts (management does not foresee major financial impact yet) .
- Risks: Launch schedule slippage (XXI/XXIII), DISH demand softness impacting ETC, international credit risk (bad debt), and capacity constraints until XIX service .