SC
Silvergate Capital Corp (SICP)·Q4 2022 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2022 was an inflection point: Silvergate reported a GAAP net loss attributable to common shareholders of $1.05B and diluted EPS of $(33.16) driven by a $885.8M loss on securities and $8.7M derivative losses tied to liquidity actions amid severe crypto-industry turmoil .
- Deposits fell 52% sequentially to $6.30B; average digital asset deposits dropped to $7.3B (from $12.0B in Q3), forcing wholesale funding and the sale of $5.2B of securities; book value per share fell to $12.93 (from $35.94 in Q3) .
- Adjusted diluted EPS was $0.48 excluding restructuring/impairment and securities/derivatives losses; net interest margin compressed to 1.54% (from 2.31% in Q3) as funding costs spiked on short-term borrowings and CDs .
- Management announced a ~40% reduction in force (costs ~$8.1M in Q1’23) and elimination of non-core products to restore profitability; they guided to lower NII/fees in 2023 and targeted cost savings of $7–$8M per quarter .
- SEN transfers were $117.1B, up 4% q/q, while digital asset customers declined to 1,620; SEN Leverage commitments fell to $1.1B; subsequent to year-end, ~$1.5B of securities were sold (additional small P&L impacts) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- SEN continued uninterrupted with $117.1B transfers (+4% q/q), demonstrating platform resilience despite industry stress .
- Management acted decisively to preserve liquidity and capital, reclassifying HTM to AFS and selling $5.2B of debt securities to right-size balance sheet; risk-based capital ratios remained above “well-capitalized” thresholds (Company total risk-based 57.26%) .
- Clear cost actions: ~200 employees (40%) reduction-in-force; estimated Q1’23 charges ~$8.1M with planned ongoing savings of $7–$8M per quarter .
- CEO reiterated focus: “We believe in the digital asset industry, and we remain focused on providing value-added services for our core institutional customers” .
What Went Wrong
- Catastrophic P&L: GAAP noninterest loss of $887.3M in Q4, driven by securities and derivative losses and a $196.2M impairment on developed technology assets (blockchain payments) .
- Funding/cost squeeze: Net interest income fell to $53.7M as average interest-bearing liabilities surged (+$4.4B q/q) with rates rising to 3.87%; cost of deposits jumped to 0.77% (from 0.16%) .
- Deposits collapsed: Total deposits fell to $6.30B (from $13.24B in Q3), with noninterest-bearing demand at $3.85B; digital asset exchange deposits dropped sharply ($2.88B vs. $7.58B Q3) .
- Balance sheet equity erosion: Book value per share fell to $12.93 (from $35.94 in Q3) due to mark-to-market from HTM-to-AFS transfer, DTA valuation allowance, and impairments .
Financial Results
Balance sheet and capital
KPIs and activity
Digital asset deposit mix
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO (press release): “While we are taking decisive actions to navigate the current environment, our mission has not changed. We believe in the digital asset industry, and we remain focused on providing value-added services for our core institutional customers.”
- CFO (call, prepared remarks): “Silvergate reported a net loss attributable to common shareholders of $1 billion or a loss of $33.16 per common share… noninterest loss for the fourth quarter of 2022 was $887.3 million… losses on securities were $885.8 million and losses on derivatives were $8.7 million…” .
- Liquidity posture: “Subsequent to the end of the year, we sold approximately $1.5 billion of securities… we will continue to evaluate our balance sheet and liquidity management needs, which will depend on deposit flows and customer behavior.” .
- Strategic reset: “We are in the process of evaluating our product portfolio and customer relationships with a focus on profitability… will offboard certain customers and eliminate certain products like digital asset custody that have become ‘too costly or complex.’” .
Q&A Highlights
- Funding and asset mix: Management highlighted a materially shortened securities portfolio duration (~1–1.5 years), with significant holdings at 0% or 20% risk weights post-repositioning, supporting elevated risk-based capital ratios .
- SEN Leverage: All SEN Leverage loans performing; utilization maintained; commitments guided down to ~$400M by end Q2’23 to align with risk and market conditions .
- Revenue trajectory: Clarified that 2023 NII and fee income would trend below adjusted Q4 levels given smaller balance sheet, higher funding costs, and narrower product scope .
- Deposit dynamics: Management recapped Q4 average digital asset deposits ($7.3B; high $11.9B, low $3.5B) and steps taken to maintain cash liquidity in excess of digital-asset-related deposits .
Estimates Context
- Analyst consensus via S&P Global could not be retrieved due to a CIQ mapping issue for ticker SICP; as a result, we cannot present comparisons versus Wall Street consensus for Q4 2022. We attempted retrieval and found consensus unavailable via the tool at this time [GetEstimates error].
- Without validated S&P Global estimates, buyside models should anchor on reported GAAP and adjusted EPS, NII trends, deposit trajectories, and management’s qualitative guidance for 2023 .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Liquidity-preserving actions drove extreme Q4 GAAP losses; the balance sheet is now smaller, more liquid, and more rate-sensitive, but equity cushions are thinner and book value sharply reduced .
- Funding costs will remain elevated near-term; expect depressed NII and fee income as management prioritizes capital and liquidity over growth in a risk-off crypto environment .
- Strategic pruning (RIF, product elimination, smaller SEN Leverage) is material; track the $7–$8M per quarter cost savings and whether they offset weaker topline to achieve H2’23 profitability targets .
- Watch deposit stability and mix (exchanges vs. institutions); stabilization of average digital asset deposits is the key leading indicator for funding, NII, and capital trajectory .
- Capital remains above regulatory “well-capitalized” despite equity compression; monitor risk-weighted asset mix, securities duration, and any further AFS realizations .
- SEN operational resilience (transfers up 4% q/q) is a positive signal; however, monetization via fees fell as volumes and customer activity declined—fee recovery requires improved crypto-market confidence .
- Near-term trading: headlines around additional securities sales, customer offboarding, or regulatory developments will be stock catalysts; medium-term thesis hinges on deposit normalization, disciplined cost execution, and measured product focus .