Sign in

Karen Cho

Chief People Officer at SIGNET JEWELERSSIGNET JEWELERS
Executive

About Karen Cho

Karen Cho, age 52, became Chief People Officer (CPO) of Signet Jewelers in February 2025, overseeing the team member experience for more than 27,000 employees globally and bringing over 30 years of retail experience spanning merchandising, operations, and human resources . Prior roles include Chief Human Resources Officer and Senior Vice President at Designer Brands (Mar 2021–Apr 2024), Vice President of Corporate HR (May 2018–Mar 2021), earlier talent management roles (Apr 2014–May 2018), and leading talent acquisition teams in Apple’s retail group . Company performance context relevant to executive pay metrics: Signet FY2025 net income was $61.2M, with pay-versus-performance TSR at $256.67 based on a $100 initial investment and comparable sales at (3.40%) for FY2025 ; FY2025 revenue was $6.70B* .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Designer Brands, Inc.Chief Human Resources Officer & Senior Vice PresidentMar 2021–Apr 2024Senior HR leadership at a retail and wholesale footwear company
Designer Brands, Inc.Vice President, Corporate HRMay 2018–Mar 2021Corporate HR leadership
Designer Brands, Inc.Talent Management rolesApr 2014–May 2018Talent management across the business
Apple Inc. (Retail Group)Led talent acquisition teams and initiativesNot disclosedLed various talent acquisition efforts within the retail group

External Roles

No public company board or external directorships disclosed for Ms. Cho in the company’s proxy/filings .

Fixed Compensation

  • Ms. Cho is an executive officer but is not a Named Executive Officer (NEO) in the FY2025 proxy; therefore, her base salary, target bonus, and actual bonus are not disclosed in the executive compensation tables .
  • Company program design: components include base salary, annual bonus (STIP), and long-term incentives (LTIP) in RSUs and PSUs, with benefits such as deferred compensation, 401(k), health/life insurance, relocation, and financial planning reimbursements .
  • Equity grant timing policy: awards are granted in open trading windows; the company does not time grants around MNPI (material nonpublic information) .

Performance Compensation

Company-wide incentive structures and metrics applicable to executive officers (note: individual targets/payouts for Ms. Cho are not disclosed):

FY2025 STIP Metrics

MetricWeightingTargetActualPayoutVesting
Adjusted Operating Income50% Not disclosedNot disclosedNot disclosedAnnual cash bonus; payout ranges set by Committee
Market Share30% Not disclosedNot disclosedNot disclosedAnnual cash bonus
Comparable Sales20% Not disclosedNot disclosedNot disclosedAnnual cash bonus

FY2025 LTIP (PSU) Metrics and Structure

MetricWeightingPerformance PeriodPayout RangeVesting Terms
Free Cash Flow50% 3 fiscal years (FY2025–FY2027) 0%–200% of target 3-year performance measurement; vesting follows performance period with service requirements
Revenue50% 3 fiscal years (FY2025–FY2027) 0%–200% of target 3-year performance measurement; vesting follows performance period with service requirements
  • Company clawback policy applies to executive officers and incentive awards; recoupment can be triggered by material restatements or material violations of Codes, and is aligned with listing standards .
  • No dividend equivalents are paid on PSUs; maximum payout limits apply to variable compensation .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

Policy ElementDetails
Ownership GuidelinesExecutives must build holdings; NEO guidelines: CEO 6× salary, former CEO 5×, other NEOs 3×; all executives required to hold 50% of net after-tax shares from vesting until meeting guidelines .
Anti-Hedging/PledgingCompany strictly prohibits hedging, short sales, monetization transactions, and pledging/margin accounts for officers, directors, and team members .
Grant TimingEquity awards granted during open trading windows; no timing around MNPI; no grants made within blackout windows around filings with material info .
Beneficial OwnershipIndividual holdings for Ms. Cho are not disclosed; as of May 15, 2025, no Common Shares are pledged by named directors/executive officers; all shares shown are owned directly .

Employment Terms

ProvisionCompany Policy / Agreement Context
Termination/Change-of-ControlCompany requires double-trigger vesting for severance and change-in-control benefits and LTIP awards .
CEO Agreement (context)CEO termination protection includes 1.5× salary+target bonus and pro-rata treatment of incentives under specified terminations; COBRA premium contribution; specific change-of-control terms apply (CEO-specific, not Ms. Cho) .
Tax Gross-upsNo excise tax gross-ups in connection with a change in control .
Deferred Compensation & BenefitsExecutives may participate in Deferred Compensation Plan, 401(k), health/life insurance, relocation, and other benefits .
Non-Compete/Non-SolicitNot disclosed for Ms. Cho; such terms are detailed for NEO agreements and specific executive transitions where applicable .

Company Performance Context (FY2023–FY2025)

MetricFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025
Revenues ($)$7,842.1M* $7,171.1M* $6,703.8M*
Net Income ($)$376.7M* $810.4M* $61.2M*
Cash from Operations ($)$797.9M* $546.9M* $590.9M*
Levered Free Cash Flow ($)$661.9M*$255.7M*$366.2M*
EBITDA ($)$839.9M*$735.1M*$587.8M*
TSR (Based on $100 initial investment)$320.87 $428.34 $256.67
Comparable Sales (%)(6.10%) (11.60%) (3.40%)

Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.

Compensation Peer Group (Benchmarking)

Abercrombie & Fitch; American Eagle Outfitters; Bath & Body Works; Capri Holdings; Dick’s Sporting Goods; Foot Locker; Nordstrom; PVH; Ralph Lauren; Tapestry; Ulta Beauty; Urban Outfitters; V.F. Corp; Victoria’s Secret & Co.; Williams-Sonoma. Peer revenue approx. $4.6B–$15.1B; peer median $7.4B; Signet revenue $6.7B; peer market caps range $1.9B–$25.6B; peer median $6.3B; Signet market cap $2.6B .

Say‑on‑Pay & Shareholder Feedback

  • FY2024 Say‑on‑Pay approval: 99.3% of votes cast supported the program .
  • FY2025 Say‑on‑Pay vote results: For 28,237,899; Against 1,184,902; Abstain 3,909,957; Broker non‑votes 3,351,422 .

Compensation Committee & Governance

  • Human Capital Management & Compensation Committee (HCMC) is entirely independent, regularly benchmarks compensation against a peer group, sets challenging goals, oversees risk, and retains Semler Brossy as its independent compensation consultant; Semler Brossy is evaluated annually for independence and has no conflicts per Committee review .
  • The Chief People Officer attends HCMC Committee meetings upon request but is not present for discussions of her own compensation .
  • Board policy prohibits hedging/pledging; share ownership policies in place; no material related party transactions involving directors or the CEO were noted .

Risk Indicators & Red Flags

  • Hedging/pledging prohibited, reducing alignment risk and leverage-related concerns .
  • Double-trigger required for severance/change-of-control benefits and LTIP awards; no excise tax gross‑ups, mitigating shareholder‑unfriendly practices .
  • Clawback policy allows recoupment for restatements and misconduct .
  • Company highlights the need to recruit/retain key executive talent during leadership transitions, implying elevated retention focus across senior leadership (including HR leadership) .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: While Ms. Cho’s individual pay mix and ownership are not disclosed (non‑NEO), company policies—ownership build/holding requirements, anti‑hedging/pledging, clawbacks, and rigorous STIP/LTIP metrics—support pay‑for‑performance alignment and reduce insider selling pressure .
  • Retention risk: The company explicitly cites the importance of retaining key executive talent during leadership transitions; as CPO overseeing >27,000 team members, Ms. Cho’s execution on human capital strategies is a lever for comparable sales and operating income momentum embedded in incentives .
  • Trading signals: Absent Form 4 specifics for Ms. Cho and no pledging allowed, near‑term insider selling pressure appears structurally limited; broader performance metrics (Comparable Sales, FCF, Revenue) drive PSU outcomes and thus long‑term equity value, aligning management incentives with shareholder returns .