SI
SELECTIVE INSURANCE GROUP INC (SIGI)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 delivered solid underwriting and investment results: combined ratio 96.1% (down 210 bps YoY), ROE 14.4%, and after-tax net investment income $95.6M . EPS was $1.76; revenue was $1.285B. Versus consensus, EPS missed by $0.10 and revenue missed by ~$22M, as estimates were $1.86 and $1.308B respectively (Wall Street consensus via S&P Global)* [functions.GetEstimates].
- Pricing momentum accelerated: overall renewal pure price 10.3%; Commercial Lines 9.1% with General Liability at 12.0%; E&S NPW +20% and combined ratio 92.5% despite higher catastrophe losses .
- Guidance reaffirmed: FY25 GAAP combined ratio 96–97% (incl. 6 pts of cats), after-tax net investment income $405M, effective tax rate 21.5%, diluted shares 61.5M .
- Key stock narrative catalysts: continued price increases above loss trends (management asserts ~300 bps above assumed loss trend), disciplined growth with E&S expansion, and caution that alternative investments could face valuation headwinds near term .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Pricing strength and margin improvement: “Total renewal pure price increased 10.3%… our full-year combined ratio guidance remains at 96% to 97%” .
- E&S growth with profitability: E&S NPW +20% YoY; combined ratio 92.5% (underlying ~81%), signaling strong growth opportunities despite competitive markets .
- Personal Lines improvement: combined ratio fell 7.1 pts YoY to 98.0% on 24.1% renewal pricing and lower cat/non-cat property losses, reflecting targeted profit actions .
What Went Wrong
- Consensus miss: EPS $1.76 vs $1.86* and revenue $1.285B vs $1.308B*, modestly below expectations (Wall Street consensus via S&P Global)* [functions.GetEstimates].
- Higher current-year casualty loss costs and slight expense ratio pressure: loss costs up 280 bps YoY to 44.9%, underwriting expense ratio up 70 bps to 31.6% .
- E&S margin volatility from catastrophes and unfavorable personal auto reserve development (4.8 pts in personal auto), while management cautioned potential near-term pressure in alternative investment income .
Financial Results
Note: Values marked with * are retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment breakdown (Q1 YoY):
KPIs:
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “Our operating ROE of 14.4% for the first quarter was a positive start to the year… Total renewal pure price increased 10.3%… General Liability pricing accelerated further to 12.0%” .
- CEO: “We are absolutely focused on restoring our profile as a company that delivers consistent underwriting margins and operating ROEs… overall renewal pure pricing… approximately 3 points above our loss trend assumption” .
- CFO: “Underlying combined ratio was 92%… we believe our full year underwriting combined ratio will meet our original 90% to 91% expectation… book value per share increased 5% in the quarter” .
- CFO: “Alternative investments could face valuation headwinds… heightened risk that alternative investment income could come under pressure when we report second quarter earnings” .
Q&A Highlights
- Casualty loss trends: Management’s view unchanged—GL all-in loss trend ~9% driven by severity; overall casualty ~8.5% .
- Commercial auto: Multi-year earned rate above elevated loss trends supports improved picks; auto physical damage tracks property trend (~3.5%), aiding overall line .
- Seasonality: Q1 underlying combined ratio typically 100 bps higher vs full-year midpoint due to non-cat property; 2025 seasonality viewed as typical .
- Workers’ comp: Setting 2025 ELR conservatively; pure rate ~–3%, flat frequency, mid-single-digit medical severity; wages are offsetting exposure driver .
- Tariffs: Impact seen as manageable given labor/materials mix, domestic sourcing, and quick exposure adjustments; largest impact would be in personal/commercial auto physical damage .
- Retention/pricing dynamics: Willingness to trade some new business/conversion for price adequacy; retention holding up due to granular pricing execution .
- Reserves: Q1 reserve change isolated to personal auto (New Jersey severities); no commercial lines reserve changes .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 actuals vs consensus: EPS $1.76 vs $1.86* (miss); revenue $1.285B vs $1.308B* (miss). Analyst coverage: 7 EPS estimates; 3 revenue estimates (Wall Street consensus via S&P Global)* [functions.GetEstimates].
- Implications: Despite the small top/bottom-line misses, pricing above loss trends, a reaffirmed combined ratio outlook, and investment yield tailwinds should support estimate stability on underwriting, while near-term alternative investment variability may drive cautious adjustments to NII modeling .
Note: Values marked with * are retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Price > loss trend: With renewal pure price ~300 bps above assumed loss trend, expect underlying margin expansion if maintained; watch GL pricing sustainability at 12% .
- E&S growth engine: Strong E&S momentum (+20% NPW) but cat-driven volatility; underlying profitability remains attractive (~81% underlying CR) .
- Personal lines progressing: CR improved to 98.0% on aggressive pricing and underwriting actions; new business curtailed to prioritize profitability .
- Guidance confidence: FY25 combined ratio 96–97% reaffirmed with 6 cat pts; $405M NII target intact but alt investments could pressure Q2 reported income .
- Capital and investment backdrop: February $400M notes boost investable assets; portfolio remains high quality (A+ avg credit, ~4.1-year duration), supporting durable NII .
- Watch list into Q2: Alternative investment lag effect, cat season exposure, and continued casualty severity trends; reinsurance program and underwriting discipline mitigate tail risks .
- Tactical: Near-term trading may hinge on evidence of margin trajectory (underlying CR tracking to 90–91%), GL pricing stickiness, and alternative investment marks; medium-term thesis centers on disciplined pricing, E&S growth, and ROE normalization toward long-term averages .