SH
Southland Holdings, Inc. (SLND)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 delivered margin recovery despite lower revenue: revenue $239.486M vs $288.097M in Q1 2024 and $267.250M in Q4 2024; gross margin improved to 9.0% (from 7.1% y/y and 2.9% q/q) as Civil posted 22% gross margin while Transportation was held back by Materials & Paving (M&P) losses .
- Net loss per share was $(0.08) (vs $(0.01) y/y; $(0.09) q/q); EBITDA turned positive at $10.084M after two weak quarters (Q4 $(2.725)M; Q3 $(58.740)M) as legacy drag moderated .
- Backlog ended at $2.470B (down from $2.573B in Q4 on revenue recognition outpacing awards); management expects ~40% of backlog to convert over the next 12 months, with stronger activity in 2H 2025 .
- No formal guidance; directional items reiterated: interest expense ≈$9.5M/quarter, tax rate 20–24%, M&P substantially complete by end of 2025; catalysts include Civil mid-teens margin sustainability, major Transportation project ramps (Shands Bridge, RFK), and potential cash from claim settlements (timing uncertain) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Civil segment execution drove the quarter: Civil revenue rose to $102.916M (from $84.273M y/y) with gross margin at 22.0% (21.2% y/y). “Without the impacts from legacy write-downs, this business can consistently deliver mid-teen results.” .
- EBITDA inflected positive to $10.084M as consolidated gross margin reached its highest first-quarter level since before COVID, aided by strong Civil performance and core backlog quality .
- Backlog quality and pipeline: New awards of ~$137M lifted total backlog to ~$2.5B; upcoming opportunities cited across Civil (e.g., Black Creek Tunnel, Jordan Lake, Glades Reservoir) and Transportation (bridges in Northeast/Florida) .
-
What Went Wrong
- Transport segment losses tied to M&P: Transportation posted a $(1.151)M gross loss (vs $2.551M y/y) with M&P contributing $18.1M of revenue and $(9.1)M gross profit, including a $3.5M non-cash charge .
- Revenue declined versus both Q4 and y/y as certain projects approached completion and the M&P exit reduced volume (Q1 revenue $239.486M vs $288.097M y/y; $267.250M q/q) .
- Legacy wind-down and disputes still weigh on predictability: management reiterated no formal guidance given dispute settlement timing uncertainty, though it expects positive operating cash flow weighted to 2H 2025 .
Financial Results
Segment performance (Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024):
Key KPIs and balance sheet:
Additional notes:
- Operating cash flow: +$6.429M in Q1 2025 .
- M&P in Q1 2025: revenue $18.1M; gross profit impact $(9.1)M; includes ~$3.5M non-cash contract closeout charge .
- “Core” excluding M&P in Q1: consolidated revenue $221M; gross profit $31M; margin 14% .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We started the year with a strong performance, with revenue of $239 million, gross profit of $21.5 million, and positive cash flow from operations of $6.4 million... Civil segment... delivered a gross profit margin of 22%” .
- “During the quarter, we added approximately $137 million in new awards… bringing our total backlog to approximately $2.5 billion” .
- “Based on what we know today, we do not expect the current tariffs to have a material effect on our current book of business… our direct exposure to cross-border material procurement is minimal” .
- “Our new core backlog makes up over 90% of our total backlog… new core projects continue to deliver strong double-digit margins” .
Q&A Highlights
- Civil cadence and sustainability: Management expects Civil to sustain mid-teens margins, noting 22% is a “high bar” but achievable absent legacy impacts; revenues likely to pick up in the back half due to seasonality .
- M&P profit impact and path: Q1 gross profit impact $(9)M (incl. ~$3.5M non-cash); backlog appropriately stated; aim to substantially complete M&P by end 2025 while generating positive operating cash flow from claim resolutions .
- Transportation bookings and Key Bridge: Pipeline remains robust across regions; potential subcontract opportunity on Francis Scott Key Bridge as Kiewit advances design .
- Alternative delivery updates: Winnipeg and Burnside Bridge preconstruction phases progressing; target conversion to construction contracts within ~12 months .
- Liquidity and leverage: Ample liquidity with unrestricted cash more than double y/y; access to delayed draw facility; selective bidding emphasized .
- Free cash flow timing: Positive operating cash flow in Q1; expected to be more heavily weighted to back half of 2025 .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus via S&P Global for Q1 2025 revenue, EPS, and EBITDA was unavailable in our query window (no estimates returned), so we cannot assess beats/misses this quarter. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Civil is the engine: Double-digit margins (22% in Q1) and management’s confidence in sustaining mid-teens margins underpin the gross margin recovery even as revenue normalizes from legacy and M&P exits .
- Transportation should improve as project ramps replace M&P drag: Shands Bridge and RFK ramps are expected to offset the wind-down; M&P still a near-term headwind but shrinking and slated for substantial completion by end 2025 .
- Cash catalysts exist, but timing uncertain: Management continues to work claims/disputes, expects significant cash inflows over coming quarters; model conservatively on timing .
- Backlog solid, conversion slightly faster: Backlog is $2.470B with ~40% burn expected over next 12 months—watch 2H conversion and bookings pace to gauge 2026 visibility .
- Interest and tax run-rate reiterated: Use ~$9.5M/quarter for interest expense and 20–24% effective tax rate for modeling until debt or rate changes warrant revisions .
- Liquidity supports selective growth: Unrestricted cash has more than doubled y/y; delayed draw available; focus remains on higher-margin, shorter-duration Civil projects and selective large Transportation awards .
- Near-term trading lens: Stock may react to evidence of sustained Civil margins, resolution of larger claims, visible ramps on Shands/RFK, and any Baltimore Key Bridge subcontract award; conversely, further M&P charges or delayed claims could weigh on sentiment .