SS
Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Revenue rose 15.3% year over year to $20.3M, with Adjusted EBITDA increasing to $2.9M and diluted EPS at $0.06; strong demand in marine, aerospace, and power generation drove the quarter .
- Mix shift continued toward high-growth markets: 73% of revenue from aerospace, marine, and power generation vs 60% a year ago; LNG gallons sold were up 21% y/y, with adjusted EBITDA margin at 14.3% vs 14.6% last year .
- Management advanced the Galveston LNG project, secured a 10-year marine bunkering agreement (~40% of planned offtake), is in late-stage talks for another ~20%, and targets ~75% of capacity contracted by FID in early 2026; construction is expected to begin in Q1 2026 with start-up in late 2027 .
- Liquidity remained strong at $15.5M (cash $10.3M and ~$5.2M available credit), with cash from operations of $2.4M; CapEx was $3.9M, primarily to support Galveston engineering/design ahead of FID .
- S&P Global Wall Street consensus estimates for Q3 2025 were unavailable for SLNG; estimate comparison is not possible at this time. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Record growth across target markets: marine revenue +31.5% y/y, aerospace +88.3%, power generation +31.4%; management highlighted “strong operational execution” and higher throughput volumes in marine, aerospace, and power generation .
- Mix shift toward strategic sectors: 73% of revenue from aerospace, marine, and power generation vs 60% last year, supporting improved profitability and diversification; adjusted EBITDA rose to $2.9M .
- Strategic milestones: secured a 10-year marine bunkering agreement tied to the Galveston LNG facility; progressing financing (JV structure with project-level debt/equity), engineering/design, and long-lead items ahead of early-2026 FID and Q1 2026 construction start .
Quotes:
- “Stabilis demonstrated strong operational execution… Higher throughput volumes across our marine, aerospace, and power generation markets translated to improved profitability” — Casey Crenshaw .
- “We expect to have approximately 75% of the total capacity sold under long-term customer contracts by the time we reach final investment decision in early 2026” — Casey Crenshaw .
- “Capital expenditures increased… ahead of a final investment decision. Our liquidity position remains robust” — Andy Puhala .
What Went Wrong
- Adjusted EBITDA margin compressed vs prior year (14.3% vs 14.6%), driven by roll-off of a high-margin industrial project; customer mix was less favorable .
- Net equity income from the Chinese JV declined vs Q2, and the company recorded an obsolete equipment write-off; these items tempered operating leverage despite revenue growth .
- Limited formal guidance and consensus estimate visibility: no numeric revenue/EPS guidance provided, and S&P Global consensus for Q3 2025 was unavailable, constraining external benchmarking. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Financial Results
Segment/End-Market Trend Breakdown (y/y growth rates):
Key KPIs and Balance Sheet/Liquidity:
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategic message: “This is a transformational moment… retain operational control… maximize value for all shareholders” — Casey Crenshaw on Galveston JV financing and long-term returns .
- Operating execution: “Third quarter volume increased by more than 20% y/y… robust throughput from cruise activity” — Casey Crenshaw .
- Financial discipline: “Liquidity at quarter-end was $15.5M… CapEx $3.9M, primarily related to early engineering/design for Galveston” — Andy Puhala .
- Cost advantage: “We’ve got a cost advantage… well-developed facility and Jones Act vessel… makes the selling part easier” — Casey Crenshaw on bunkering offtake commercialization .
Q&A Highlights
- Permitting and timeline clarity: Company has export license; tracking permits with Texas Railroad Commission and U.S. Coast Guard; management does not expect timeline impact .
- Offtake customer mix: Second prospective customer for ~20% capacity is a cruise customer; remaining capacity could be cruise, container shipping, or traders; aiming for one to two additional counterparties .
- Capacity expansion options: Considering adding a second train at George West and deploying capacity where most customer-centric; will prioritize contracted offtake and location-specific needs .
- Third-party supply strategy: High utilization at company facilities; third-party LNG used to flex volumes/logistics; long-standing approach to build demand and optimize own molecules .
- Data center power: Distributed power use cases increasing; LNG bridges supply where grid/pipe constraints exist; reshoring/manufacturing also adding grid demand .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus for Q3 2025 (EPS, revenue, EBITDA, # of estimates) was unavailable for SLNG; a direct comparison vs estimates cannot be provided at this time. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Mix shift to strategic end-markets is durable, with aerospace, marine, and power generation now ~73% of revenue; this should support more stable volumes and better pricing over time .
- The Galveston LNG project has de-risked demand with a 10-year bunkering contract (~40% of offtake) and another ~20% in late-stage discussions; target ~75% contracted by FID early 2026 .
- Liquidity remains robust ($15.5M), and operating cash generation continues ($2.4M in Q3); near-term CapEx will ramp ($3–$5M pre-FID) to advance engineering/design, but project funding is expected at the project level (JV) .
- Margin trajectory: Adjusted EBITDA margin recovered to 14.3% from 8.6% in Q2, though slightly below 14.6% last year due to mix; watch ongoing segment mix and JV equity income impacts .
- Near-term trading catalysts: Additional Galveston offtake announcements, permitting updates (TRRC/USCG), and clarity on JV financing could drive sentiment and volume .
- Medium-term thesis: Execution on Galveston and potential George West expansion, plus repeatable aerospace and distributed power contracts, can scale EBITDA and cash flow with improved asset utilization .
- Estimate visibility remains limited; absence of consensus benchmarks increases reliance on company-specific milestones and contract disclosures. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Footnote: *Values retrieved from S&P Global.